呼和浩特城市地标的历史演化研究
|
摘要
城市地标是认知城市的重要参照系,在城市发展中遭遇巨大挑战。文章采用历史文献法和比较法对呼和浩特两个时期的城市地标进行分类,发现地标在演化中有着不同的境遇,有的被完整保留下来,有的被改变了记忆,有的只保留了地名或记忆。地标在城市发展中受战争、地方工业基地建设、边疆政策及行政干预的影响,居民需要不断地去接受并适应不同时代地标所赋予的文化内涵,并形成新的文化认同。民族地标在边疆城市的传承与表现对地方发展具有重要的民族和文化意义。
Urban landmark is an important reference frame to recognize a city,and it encounters great challenge in urban development.This paper classifies the urban landmarks of Hohhot in two periods by using the methods of historical documents and comparative studies.It is found that the landmarks have been under different conditions in evolution:some have been preserved,some have been changed,while some have retained the place names or memory.Landmarks are affected by the war,local industrial base construction,border policy and administrative intervention.The residents need to accept and adapt to the cultural connotations given by the landmarks at different times and form new cultural identity.The inheritance and expression of national landmarks in frontier cities have important national and cultural significance for local development.
Urban landmark is an important reference frame to recognize a city,and it encounters great challenge in urban development.This paper classifies the urban landmarks of Hohhot in two periods by using the methods of historical documents and comparative studies.It is found that the landmarks have been under different conditions in evolution:some have been preserved,some have been changed,while some have retained the place names or memory.Landmarks are affected by the war,local industrial base construction,border policy and administrative intervention.The residents need to accept and adapt to the cultural connotations given by the landmarks at different times and form new cultural identity.The inheritance and expression of national landmarks in frontier cities have important national and cultural significance for local development.
引文
[1]凯文·林奇.城市形态[M].林庆怡,陈朝晖邓华.译.北京:华夏出版社,2001:35-36.
[2]陆邵明.拯救具有“集体记忆”的独特场所建构文化认同[N].人民日报,2012-4-12.
[3]陆邵明.记忆场所:世界文化遗产保护的新趋势[A]//2012城市发展与规划大会论文集[C].2012.
[4]陆邵明.留住“乡愁”需保护活化“记忆场所”[N].文汇报,2015-6-17(5).
[5]刑野.刘映元文集[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,2012:14-66.
[6]佟靖仁.呼和浩特满族简史[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1987:21-83.
[7]绥远通志馆.绥远通志稿:第2册[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,2007:363-379.
[8]呼和浩特文物事业管理处.呼和浩特文物(1-8期)[J].呼和浩特文物,1987(1):92-106.
[9]颜景良.呼和浩特交通志[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1997:97.
[10]刘成法.绥远城将军衙署的历史变迁[A]//呼和浩特史料:第3集[M].呼和浩特市:呼和浩特出版社,1983.
[11]呼和浩特市新城区志编纂办公室.新城区志[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,199]:558-564.
[12]呼和浩特园林处.呼和浩特园林绿化史料(1949-1985)[M].呼和浩特:呼和浩特园林处内部印刷,1989:11.
[13]#12
[14]朱涛.阅读梁思成之六新中国建筑运动与粱思成的思想改造:1956-1957[J].时代建筑,2013(3):117-125.
[15]林幹,等.昭君与昭君墓[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,1979:67-68.
[16]伊利尔·沙里宁.城市:它的发展、衰败与未来[M].顾启源,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1986:78.
[2]陆邵明.拯救具有“集体记忆”的独特场所建构文化认同[N].人民日报,2012-4-12.
[3]陆邵明.记忆场所:世界文化遗产保护的新趋势[A]//2012城市发展与规划大会论文集[C].2012.
[4]陆邵明.留住“乡愁”需保护活化“记忆场所”[N].文汇报,2015-6-17(5).
[5]刑野.刘映元文集[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,2012:14-66.
[6]佟靖仁.呼和浩特满族简史[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1987:21-83.
[7]绥远通志馆.绥远通志稿:第2册[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,2007:363-379.
[8]呼和浩特文物事业管理处.呼和浩特文物(1-8期)[J].呼和浩特文物,1987(1):92-106.
[9]颜景良.呼和浩特交通志[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1997:97.
[10]刘成法.绥远城将军衙署的历史变迁[A]//呼和浩特史料:第3集[M].呼和浩特市:呼和浩特出版社,1983.
[11]呼和浩特市新城区志编纂办公室.新城区志[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,199]:558-564.
[12]呼和浩特园林处.呼和浩特园林绿化史料(1949-1985)[M].呼和浩特:呼和浩特园林处内部印刷,1989:11.
[13]#12
[14]朱涛.阅读梁思成之六新中国建筑运动与粱思成的思想改造:1956-1957[J].时代建筑,2013(3):117-125.
[15]林幹,等.昭君与昭君墓[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,1979:67-68.
[16]伊利尔·沙里宁.城市:它的发展、衰败与未来[M].顾启源,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1986:78.