52 m高喷煤车间定向爆破拆除
|
摘要
为了顺利完成杭钢厂52 m高不对称框架结构喷煤车间的爆破拆除,在确定倒塌方向之后,首先依据工程经验计算出理论切口高度12.5 m,采用ABAQUS显式动力模块,建立1:1实体有限元模型,分析待拆除车间在理论切口高度下的倒塌情况。然后提取东北侧一跨顶层的水平位移进行模拟计算,得出顶层水平位移为72.3 m,远大于北侧工业遗存建筑物与车间的距离40 m。为保护爆区北侧建筑物,根据数值分析结果,综合考虑车间结构特点和周围环境,采用双切口单向折叠爆破拆除方法,合理选取爆破参数,最终倒塌方向精准,未对周围建筑造成损害,可为同类爆破拆除工程提供参考。
In order to successfully complete the blasting demolition of the pulverized coal workshop of Hangzhou Steel Plant with asymmetrical frame structure of 52 m height, the theoretical incision height of 12. 5 m was calculated based on engineering experience after determining the direction of collapse, then the ABAQUS explicit power module was used and a1 : 1 solid finite element model was established to analyze the collapse of the to-be-demolition workshop at the theoretical notch height. Then the horizontal displacement of the top layer of the northeast side was extracted and calculated and the results show that the horizontal displacement of the top layer was 72.3 m, which was much larger than the distance of 40 m between the industrial heritage buildings on the north side and workshops. According to the results of numerical analysis,the structural characteristics of the workshop and the surrounding environment were considered, the double-cut one-way folding blasting demolition method was adopted and the blasting parameters were reasonably selected in order to protect the buildings on the north side of the explosion area. The final collapse direction was accurate and caused no damage to the surrounding buildings, which can provide a reference for similar blasting demolition projects.
In order to successfully complete the blasting demolition of the pulverized coal workshop of Hangzhou Steel Plant with asymmetrical frame structure of 52 m height, the theoretical incision height of 12. 5 m was calculated based on engineering experience after determining the direction of collapse, then the ABAQUS explicit power module was used and a1 : 1 solid finite element model was established to analyze the collapse of the to-be-demolition workshop at the theoretical notch height. Then the horizontal displacement of the top layer of the northeast side was extracted and calculated and the results show that the horizontal displacement of the top layer was 72.3 m, which was much larger than the distance of 40 m between the industrial heritage buildings on the north side and workshops. According to the results of numerical analysis,the structural characteristics of the workshop and the surrounding environment were considered, the double-cut one-way folding blasting demolition method was adopted and the blasting parameters were reasonably selected in order to protect the buildings on the north side of the explosion area. The final collapse direction was accurate and caused no damage to the surrounding buildings, which can provide a reference for similar blasting demolition projects.
引文
[1]邢光武,张北龙,贾海波,等.105 m高电缆车间爆破拆除与振动危害控制[J].工程爆破,2016,22(3):83-86.XING G W, ZHANG B L,JIA H B, et al. Blasting demolition and vibration damage control of 105 m high cable workshop[J]. Engineering Blasting,2016,22(3):83-86.
[2]洪卫良.120 m高钢筋混凝土烟囱爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2018,24(2):66-70,76.HONG W L. Blasting demolition of a 120 m tall reinforced concrete chimney[J]. Engineering Blasting,2018,24(2):66-70,76.
[3]王小波,李长山,谢国森,等.十层框架结构楼房的单向折叠爆破拆除[J].爆破,2006,23(4):42-45.WANG X B, LI C S, XIE G S, et al. Unidirectionalfold blasting demolition of a ten-storey frame construction building[J]. Blasting,2006,23(4):42-45.
[4]朱朝祥,吴岩,崔允武.十四层框架结构办公楼的爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2007,13(3):59-61,52.ZHU C X, WU Y,CUI Y W. Blasting demolition of an old fourteen storeys office building[J].Engineering Blasting,2007,13(3):59-61,52.
[5]谢承煜,罗周全,贾楠,等.框架结构厂房定向爆破拆除及效果分析[J].爆破,2013,30(2):122-126.XIE C Y, LUO Z Q, JIA N, et al. Directional explosive demolition and effect analysis of frame structure plant CJ]. Blasting,2013,30(2):122-126.
[6]李伟,王群,胡军,等.框架结构联体大厦双折叠爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2016,22(5):83-86.LI W,WANG Q,HU J,et al. Double folding blasting demolition of frame building[J]. Engineering Blasting,2016,22(5):83-86.
[7]汪旭光.爆破手册[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2010.WANG X G. Handbook of blasting[M]. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press,2010.
[8]国家安全生产监督管理总局,爆破安全规程:GB6722-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.State Administration of Work Safety. Safety regulations for blasting:GB 6722-2014[S]. Beijing:China Standards Press,2015.
[9]范学臣,纪臻,生鸿杰.青岛同泰橡胶厂内胎车间爆破拆除[J].爆破,2014,31(1):103-105.FAN X C,Ji Z,SHENG H J. Explosive demolition of inner tyre tube workshop building in Qingdao Tongtai rubber factory[J]. Blasting,2014,31(1):103-105.
[2]洪卫良.120 m高钢筋混凝土烟囱爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2018,24(2):66-70,76.HONG W L. Blasting demolition of a 120 m tall reinforced concrete chimney[J]. Engineering Blasting,2018,24(2):66-70,76.
[3]王小波,李长山,谢国森,等.十层框架结构楼房的单向折叠爆破拆除[J].爆破,2006,23(4):42-45.WANG X B, LI C S, XIE G S, et al. Unidirectionalfold blasting demolition of a ten-storey frame construction building[J]. Blasting,2006,23(4):42-45.
[4]朱朝祥,吴岩,崔允武.十四层框架结构办公楼的爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2007,13(3):59-61,52.ZHU C X, WU Y,CUI Y W. Blasting demolition of an old fourteen storeys office building[J].Engineering Blasting,2007,13(3):59-61,52.
[5]谢承煜,罗周全,贾楠,等.框架结构厂房定向爆破拆除及效果分析[J].爆破,2013,30(2):122-126.XIE C Y, LUO Z Q, JIA N, et al. Directional explosive demolition and effect analysis of frame structure plant CJ]. Blasting,2013,30(2):122-126.
[6]李伟,王群,胡军,等.框架结构联体大厦双折叠爆破拆除[J].工程爆破,2016,22(5):83-86.LI W,WANG Q,HU J,et al. Double folding blasting demolition of frame building[J]. Engineering Blasting,2016,22(5):83-86.
[7]汪旭光.爆破手册[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2010.WANG X G. Handbook of blasting[M]. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press,2010.
[8]国家安全生产监督管理总局,爆破安全规程:GB6722-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.State Administration of Work Safety. Safety regulations for blasting:GB 6722-2014[S]. Beijing:China Standards Press,2015.
[9]范学臣,纪臻,生鸿杰.青岛同泰橡胶厂内胎车间爆破拆除[J].爆破,2014,31(1):103-105.FAN X C,Ji Z,SHENG H J. Explosive demolition of inner tyre tube workshop building in Qingdao Tongtai rubber factory[J]. Blasting,2014,31(1):103-105.