乡村振兴与农村传统文化资源传承创新的村落社区机理探析
|
摘要
乡村振兴与农村文化资源传承创新之间是一种辩证统一的关系,二者统一于村落社区整体发展的实践过程中。在乡村振兴中实现农村文化资源传承创新,就是要以村落社区为基本载体,通过村落社区的整体发展来实现农村文化资源的整体性传承。基于南宁市的案例分析发现,村落社区农村传统文化资源传承创新与乡村振兴有效融合的机理表现为三种基本类型:村落自治组织引导下的草根文化团体、政社互动下的公共文化事业、资本和市场引导下的文化产业。要实现村落社区农村传统文化资源传承创新与乡村振兴有效融合,需要进一步从村落社区规划、村落产业开发、村落组织建设、村落主体培育以及多元主体参与等方面进行优化提升。
There exists a relationship of dialectical unity between rural vitalization and the inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources, which finds expression in. the integral development of the village community. The realization of the complete inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources relies on the village community as the basic carrier, and its integral development. This case study in Nanning concludes that effective fusion mechanism of rural vitalization and the inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources finds expression in three basic types: the grass-roots cultural groups guided by village-based autonomous organizations; public culture entities in the interaction between the government and the grassroots organizations; culture industry guided by capital and market. The effective integration of the inheritance and innovation of village-based cultural resources and rural vitalization relies on the optimization of the following aspects: good planning of the village community, good development of village industry, good construction of village organizations, the training of major village participants, and involvement of multi-participants.
There exists a relationship of dialectical unity between rural vitalization and the inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources, which finds expression in. the integral development of the village community. The realization of the complete inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources relies on the village community as the basic carrier, and its integral development. This case study in Nanning concludes that effective fusion mechanism of rural vitalization and the inheritance and innovation of rural cultural resources finds expression in three basic types: the grass-roots cultural groups guided by village-based autonomous organizations; public culture entities in the interaction between the government and the grassroots organizations; culture industry guided by capital and market. The effective integration of the inheritance and innovation of village-based cultural resources and rural vitalization relies on the optimization of the following aspects: good planning of the village community, good development of village industry, good construction of village organizations, the training of major village participants, and involvement of multi-participants.
引文
① 李先明,成积春:《中华优秀传统文化传承体系的构建:理论、实践与路径》,《南京社会科学》2016年第11期。
(1)刘慧萍:《农耕文化传承与农民权利保障的互动及协同——以乡村振兴战略为背景》,《理论与改革》2018年第3期。
(2)杜育红,杨小敏:《乡村振兴:作为战略支撑的乡村教育及其发展路径》,《教育文化论坛》,2018年第3期。
(3)张英魁,徐彩勤:《当代中国乡村文化遗产保护的困境与治理对策——基于山东省莒县柏庄古村的考察》,《长白学刊》2015年第5期。
(4)李强:《少数民族村寨旅游的社区自主和民族文化保护与发展——以云南泸沽湖与青海小庄村为例》,《贵州民族研究》2010年第2期。
(5)邓小艳:《文化传承视野下社区参与非物质文化遗产旅游开发的思路探讨》,《广西民族研究》2012年第1期。
(6)任超,朱启臻:《农村社区“孝”文化传承路径探讨——基于黑龙江省N市T村孝文化传承调查》,《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第5期。
(7)鲁可荣,程川:《传统村落公共空间变迁与乡村文化传承——以浙江三村为例》,《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第6期。
(1)刘慧萍:《农耕文化传承与农民权利保障的互动及协同——以乡村振兴战略为背景》,《理论与改革》2018年第3期。
(2)杜育红,杨小敏:《乡村振兴:作为战略支撑的乡村教育及其发展路径》,《教育文化论坛》,2018年第3期。
(3)张英魁,徐彩勤:《当代中国乡村文化遗产保护的困境与治理对策——基于山东省莒县柏庄古村的考察》,《长白学刊》2015年第5期。
(4)李强:《少数民族村寨旅游的社区自主和民族文化保护与发展——以云南泸沽湖与青海小庄村为例》,《贵州民族研究》2010年第2期。
(5)邓小艳:《文化传承视野下社区参与非物质文化遗产旅游开发的思路探讨》,《广西民族研究》2012年第1期。
(6)任超,朱启臻:《农村社区“孝”文化传承路径探讨——基于黑龙江省N市T村孝文化传承调查》,《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第5期。
(7)鲁可荣,程川:《传统村落公共空间变迁与乡村文化传承——以浙江三村为例》,《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第6期。