云南省怒江傈僳族自治州居住地景观审美感知研究(英文)
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Aesthetic Perception of Residential Landscapes in Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan Province
  • 作者:樊杰 ; 胡望舒 ; 陈东 ; 孙威
  • 英文作者:FAN Jie, HU Wangshu, CHEN Dong and SUN Wei Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 关键词:审美感知 ; 居住地景观 ; 影响因素 ; Logistic回归模型 ; 怒江傈僳族自治州
  • 英文关键词:aesthetic perceptions; residential landscapes; influential factors; logistic regression model; Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture
  • 中文刊名:JORE
  • 英文刊名:资源与生态学报(英文版)
  • 机构:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2013-06-30
  • 出版单位:Journal of Resources and Ecology
  • 年:2013
  • 期:v.4
  • 基金:National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2008BAH31B01);; Key Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZZD-EW-06);; Key Project of the National Natural Sciences Foundation (No.40830741)
  • 语种:英文;
  • 页:JORE201302010
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-5885/P
  • 分类号:63-70
摘要
本地居民对居住地景观的审美感知水平对于区域大尺度景观的保护与持续利用具有重要影响,这在相对欠发达但具有较高审美价值景观资源的地区意义更为重大。本文以云南省怒江傈僳族自治州为例,基于620份针对当地居民的调查问卷与现场调研,通过构建Logistic回归模型,分析了怒江州本地居民对居住地景观的审美感知状况及相关影响因素。结果表明,怒江州本地居民对于居住地景观的审美感知水平较高,有75.81%的受访者认为居住地周边景观是美的。对这一审美感知具有影响的因素共有8项,在直接影响因素中,是否在保护区内、行政村周边高程标准差具有正向影响;行政村到最近县城距离、是否认为近年生态环境恶化、是否认为旅游开发存在不好的影响、是否希望进入城市生活具有负向影响。在间接影响因素中,包括住房类型和家中是否有电视都具有正向影响。本文据此尝试提出提高怒江州居民对居住地景观审美感知水平、促进当地景观保护与持续利用的相关政策建议。
        The aesthetic perceptions of local residents towards residential landscapes are significant to the protection and sustainable development of regional landscapes, especially in underdeveloped areas with landscape resources of higher aesthetic value. Using Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture in Yunnan Province as a case study, we conducted questionnaires with 620 local residents and a logistic regression model to determine aesthetic perceptions and factors affecting these perceptions. We found that local residents in Nujiang hold a relatively high perception of their residential landscapes. A majority of respondents, 75.81%, believe their residential landscapes are beautiful. Eight factors were found to influence the aesthetic perception. In direct influential factors, administrative village located in the protected areas and the standard deviation of the elevation around the administrative village have positive influence; distance from administrative village to county town, the ecological environment has changed in recent years, whether tourism development has a negative impact and wish to live in the city have negative influence. In indirect influential factors, both residential house type and have a television at home have positive influence. Based on these results, we discussed relevant policy suggestions to maintain the aesthetic perceptions held by local residents of their residential landscapes and promote the protection and sustainable development of this valuable landscape in Nujiang.
引文
Beza B B.2010.The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of theMt.Everest Trek.Landscape and Urban Planning,97(4): 306-317.
    Byg A,I Theilade,M R Nielsen,J F Lund.2012.Local ecologicalknowledge and its relevance for management and research.DevelopmentBriefs Policy,(16): 1-4.
    Cheng X Z.2009.Ideological foundation and theoretical progress ofecological aesthetics in USA.Literary Review,(1): 69-74.(in Chinese)
    Daniel T C.2001.Whither scenic beauty?Visual landscape qualityassessment in the 21st century.Landscape and Urban Planning,54 (1-4):267-281.
    DhubháináNí,M C Fléchard,R Moloney,D O'Connor.2009.Stakeholders'perceptions of forestry in rural areas: Two case studies in Ireland.LandUse Policy,26(3): 695-703.
    Donald B R.1987.Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys.NewYork: John Wiley & Sons Inc.,75-112.
    Erickson D,R Ryan,R D Young.2002.Woodlots in the rural landscape:landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA)case study.Landscape and Urban Planning,58(2-4): 101-112.
    Freeman R E,R O Ray.2001.Landscape ecology practice by small scaleriver conservation groups.Landscape and Urban Planning,46(1-4): 171-184.
    Gobster P H,J I Nassauer,T C Daniel.2007.The shared landscape: Whatdoes aesthetics have to do with ecology?Landscape Ecology,22: 959-972.
    Gobster P H.2010.Development of ecological aesthetics in the West: alandscape perception and assessment perspective.Academic ResearchJournal,(4): 2-14.(in Chinese)
    Han Z H.2012.Discussions on the policies to solve Nujiang Problem.China Economic & Trade Herald,(12): 47-49.(in Chinese)
    Karthuser J M,F Filli,I Mose.2011.Perception of and attitudes towardsa new Swiss biosphere reserve: A comparison of residents’and visitors’views.Eco.Mont-Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research,3(2):5-12.
    Lund J F.K Balooni,L Puri.2010.Perception-based methods to evaluateconservation impact in forests managed through popular participation.Ecology and Society,15(3): 5.
    ParéS,Savadogo P,Tigabu M,Ouadba J M.2010.Consumptive valuesand local perception of dry forest decline in Burkina Faso,West Africa.Environment,Development and Sustainability,12(2): 277-295.
    Rao K S,S Nautiyal,R K Maikhuri,K G Saxena.2003.Local peoples’knowledge,aptitude and perceptions of planning and management issuesin Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve,India.Environmental Management,31(2): 168-81.
    Russ P,T C Daniel.2002.Good looking: In defense of scenic landscapeaesthetics.Landscape and Urban Planning,60(1): 43-56.
    Ryan R L.1998.Local perceptions and values for a midwestern rivercorridor.Landscape and Urban Planning,42(2-4): 225-237.
    Ryan R L.2002.Preserving rural character in New England: Localresidents’perceptions of alternative residential development.Landscapeand Urban Planning,61: 19-35.
    Ryan R L.2006.Comparing the attitudes of local residents,planners,anddevelopers about preserving rural character in New England.Landscapeand Urban Planning,75: 5-22.
    Sui G,Hao B Y,Peng L.2010.Data analysis of elevation standard deviation classifying relief degree of land surface.Journal of Taiyuan University ofTechnology,41 (4): 381-401.(in Chinses)
    Trakolis D.2001.Perceptions,preferences,and reactions of local inhabitantsin Vikos-Aoos National Park,Greece.Environmental Management,28(5): 665-676.
    Turner M G.1989.Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,20: 171-197.
    Van den Berg A E,C A J Vlek,J F Coeterier.1998.Group differences in theaesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach.Journal of Environmental Psychology,18(2): 141-157.
    Wallner A,N Bauer,M Hunziker.2007.Perceptions and evaluationsof biosphere reserves by local residents in Switzerland and Ukraine.Landscape and Urban Planning,83(2-3): 104-114.
    Wang B Z,Wang B M,He P.2006a.Aesthetics theory and method oflandscape resource assessment.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,17(9): 1733-1739.(in Chinese)
    Wang J X,Xia S L,Li P Y.2006b.On eliminating poverty of Nujiang Valleyin the area of Three Parallel Rivers.Ecological Economy,(1): 31-34.(inChinese)
    Winter S J,H Prozesky,K J Esler.2007.A case study of landholder attitudesand behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld,a criticallyendangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom,South Africa.Environment Management,40:46-61.
    Xu J,Chen L,Lu Y,Fu B.2006.Local people’s perceptions as decisionsupport for protected area management in Wolong Biosphere Reserve,China.Journal of Environmental Management,78(4): 362-372.
    Zhou X P.1995.Aesthetic studies in landscape planning.Urban PlanningRorum,(2): 54-60.(in Chinese)
    Zube E H,J L Sell,J G Taylor.1982.Landscape perception: Research,application and theory.Landscape Planning,9 (1): 1-33.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700