福州大学城校园室外交往空间活力评价及提升研究
|
摘要
文章采用AHP法和马斯洛需求理论构造空间活力评价体系对福州大学城校园室外交往空间活力进行评价,并将评价结果放入IPA图表进行分析,从而得出相应的提升建议。结果表明,福州大学城校园外部交往空间总体而言还是比较有活力的,因子的评价结果多集中在重要性满意度均高或均低的第一象限与第三象限,而处于第二象限的"微气候舒适性"与"地域元素体现"属于急需改进的部分。针对评价结果提出3点提升建议:1)交往空间的层次划分要更加明确且具有针对性; 2)进行空间景观设计时,需把视觉美感与地域特色相结合; 3)设计者在设计过程中不仅要考虑人的短期感官生理需求,更要考虑环境对人长时间的影响。
This study evaluated the spatial vitality of the outdoor communication space of the Fuzhou University Campus City evaluation system using the AHP method and Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs,and analyzed the evaluation results by integrating into the IPA chart for giving the corresponding suggestions to improve the situation.The results showed that the outdoor communication spaces in the Fuzhou University Campus City were generally viable.The results of the factors evaluation mostly fell in the first quadrant and the third quadrant,which are both thigh or both low in significance and satisfactory.However,"Microclimate comfort" and "Reflection of geographical elements" in the second quadrant were in urgent need of improvement.In view of the evaluation results above,a few suggestions were put forward for improvement:1) The level of communication space should be more clearly defined and targeted;2) In the design of space landscape,it is necessary to combine visual aesthetics with regional features;3) Designers should not only consider the short-term sensory requirement of people,but also consider the long-term influence of environment on people.
This study evaluated the spatial vitality of the outdoor communication space of the Fuzhou University Campus City evaluation system using the AHP method and Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs,and analyzed the evaluation results by integrating into the IPA chart for giving the corresponding suggestions to improve the situation.The results showed that the outdoor communication spaces in the Fuzhou University Campus City were generally viable.The results of the factors evaluation mostly fell in the first quadrant and the third quadrant,which are both thigh or both low in significance and satisfactory.However,"Microclimate comfort" and "Reflection of geographical elements" in the second quadrant were in urgent need of improvement.In view of the evaluation results above,a few suggestions were put forward for improvement:1) The level of communication space should be more clearly defined and targeted;2) In the design of space landscape,it is necessary to combine visual aesthetics with regional features;3) Designers should not only consider the short-term sensory requirement of people,but also consider the long-term influence of environment on people.
引文
[1]石晓娜.大学校园室外交往空间人性化设计研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2011.
[2]刘群阅,余萌,林毅伟,等.大学校园运动场地满意度分析与评价[J].中国城市林业,2015,13(3):17-20.
[3]王春梅.大学校园外环境中交往空间的研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2009.
[4]张媛源.高校校园室外交往空间规划设计研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008.
[5]LEE R E,BOOTH K M,REESE SMITH J Y,et al.The physical activity resource assessment(para)instrument:evaluating features,amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods[J].Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act,2005,2(1):1-9.
[6]SAELENS B E,FRANK L D,AUFFREY C,et al.Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds:EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability[J].Journal of Physical Activity&Health,2006,3(增1):S190.
[7]VAN D S M E,DE V S,GROENEWEGEN PP,et al.Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents'health:adding quality to quantity[J].Epidemiol Community Health,2012,66(6):e8.
[8]郑丽君,武小钢,杨秀云.大学校园公共空间活力评价指标的定量化研究[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(11):821-826.
[9]吕飞,于婷婷.基于POE的寒地大学校园交往空间改造研究:以东北农业大学为例[J].华中建筑,2012,30(9):58-61.
[10]别敦荣,王严淞.普及化高等教育理念及其实践要求[J].中国高教研究,2016(4):1-8.
[11]公伟.马斯洛需求层次理论与当下景观环境的营造[J].艺术教育,2012(12):158-159.
[12]姚苏城,龙岳林.基于马斯洛需求理论的公园使用评价体系模型构建理论需求:以湖南烈士公园为例[J].住宅与房地产,2017(6):110.
[13]洪昕晨,林洲瑜,张薇,等.基于应用层次分析法的森林公园叶声景评价研究[J].声学技术,2016,35(2):91-94.
[14]王亚辉,明庆忠,吴小伟.基于IPA分析法的历史文化街区游客满意度测评研究:以扬州东关街为例[J].云南地理环境研究,2013,25(2):9-14.
[15]葛磊.大学校园室外交往空间规划设计研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2013.
[16]傅娅,代佳每.基于IPA分析法的乡建介入文创产业的建设现状质量评价研究:以四川省明月国际陶艺村为例[J].西部人居环境学刊,2016,31(6):101-106.
[2]刘群阅,余萌,林毅伟,等.大学校园运动场地满意度分析与评价[J].中国城市林业,2015,13(3):17-20.
[3]王春梅.大学校园外环境中交往空间的研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2009.
[4]张媛源.高校校园室外交往空间规划设计研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008.
[5]LEE R E,BOOTH K M,REESE SMITH J Y,et al.The physical activity resource assessment(para)instrument:evaluating features,amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods[J].Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act,2005,2(1):1-9.
[6]SAELENS B E,FRANK L D,AUFFREY C,et al.Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds:EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability[J].Journal of Physical Activity&Health,2006,3(增1):S190.
[7]VAN D S M E,DE V S,GROENEWEGEN PP,et al.Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents'health:adding quality to quantity[J].Epidemiol Community Health,2012,66(6):e8.
[8]郑丽君,武小钢,杨秀云.大学校园公共空间活力评价指标的定量化研究[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(11):821-826.
[9]吕飞,于婷婷.基于POE的寒地大学校园交往空间改造研究:以东北农业大学为例[J].华中建筑,2012,30(9):58-61.
[10]别敦荣,王严淞.普及化高等教育理念及其实践要求[J].中国高教研究,2016(4):1-8.
[11]公伟.马斯洛需求层次理论与当下景观环境的营造[J].艺术教育,2012(12):158-159.
[12]姚苏城,龙岳林.基于马斯洛需求理论的公园使用评价体系模型构建理论需求:以湖南烈士公园为例[J].住宅与房地产,2017(6):110.
[13]洪昕晨,林洲瑜,张薇,等.基于应用层次分析法的森林公园叶声景评价研究[J].声学技术,2016,35(2):91-94.
[14]王亚辉,明庆忠,吴小伟.基于IPA分析法的历史文化街区游客满意度测评研究:以扬州东关街为例[J].云南地理环境研究,2013,25(2):9-14.
[15]葛磊.大学校园室外交往空间规划设计研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2013.
[16]傅娅,代佳每.基于IPA分析法的乡建介入文创产业的建设现状质量评价研究:以四川省明月国际陶艺村为例[J].西部人居环境学刊,2016,31(6):101-106.