泰山侧柏古树叶片矿质元素分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Leaves of Ancient Platycladus orientalis Trees in Mount Tai: Analysis of Mineral Elements
  • 作者:张倩 ; 赵进红 ; 王玉山 ; 付均惠 ; 张攀 ; 周光锋 ; 孙健
  • 英文作者:Zhang Qian;Zhao Jinhong;Wang Yushan;Fu Junhui;Zhang Pan;Zhou Guangfeng;Sun Jian;Taishan Academy of Forestry Sciences;
  • 关键词:侧柏 ; 古树叶片 ; 矿质元素 ; 健康状况
  • 英文关键词:Platycladus orientalis;;ancient tree leaves;;mineral element;;health status
  • 中文刊名:ZNTB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
  • 机构:泰安市泰山林业科学研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20
  • 出版单位:中国农学通报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.522
  • 基金:林业公益性行业科研专项“重要名胜区古树健康诊断与维持技术研究”(200904019-03)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZNTB201915017
  • 页数:6
  • CN:15
  • ISSN:11-1984/S
  • 分类号:104-109
摘要
为探究泰山侧柏古树营养元素含量与古树年龄与健康的关系,以泰山罗汉崖林场和王母池景区内12株侧柏古树为研究对象,对其叶片中15种矿质元素进行测定分析。结果表明:衰弱古侧柏中除Ni和Co含量低,其他元素均高于健康古侧柏。衰弱树和健康树叶片中Ca含量存在极显著性差异,Pb含量比健康树高29.35%,这暗示罗汉崖地区古侧柏生长衰弱可能与其体内Ca、Pb 2种元素过高有关系。不同龄级古侧柏叶片元素含量,仅Na元素在一级和三级侧柏古树间存在显著性差异,即龄级高的古侧柏Na含量低于龄级低的古侧柏。罗汉崖林场和王母池景区同健康水平同龄级古侧柏叶片矿质元素含量相当。该研究找出可能与侧柏古树衰老和树龄密切相关的元素含量及变化,为泰山地区古侧柏营养诊断、衰老评价提供参考理论依据。
        To explore the relationship between nutrient elements' content and the age and health of Platycladus orientalis in Mount Tai, we measured and analyzed 15 mineral elements' content of 12 ancient Platycladus orientalis trees in Luohanya forest farm and Wangmuchi area. The results showed that: except Ni and Co, contents of other elements in weak ancient trees were higher than those in health ancient trees; besides,contents of Ca showed significant differences between the leaves of weak ancient trees and health ancient trees,and Pb in weak ancient trees was 29.35% higher than that in health ancient trees, which indicated that the weak growth condition of ancient Platycladus orientalis in Luohanya might be related to the high levels of Ca and Pb; there was significant difference of Na between the first and the third levels ancient Platycladus orientalis trees, that was to say, the content of Na in high age trees was lower than that in low age trees; mineral elements' content of ancient trees with the same health levels and the same age class levels were equivalent in Luohanya and Wangmuchi areas. This study finds out the contents and changes of the mineral elements closely related to the health and age of ancient Platycladus orientalis trees, and provides a reference for their nutrition diagnosis and health evaluation in Mount Tai.
引文
[1]李健,孙仲序,刘克长.泰山侧柏[J].山东林业科技,1998(6):26-27.
    [2]泰山风景名胜区管理委员会.泰山古树名木[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1989.
    [3]王玉山,陶娟,赵进红,等.古树名木研究概述[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(3):1196-1198.
    [4]张继澍.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006-12.
    [5]张艳洁,丛日晨,赵琦,等.适用于表征古树衰老的生理指标[J].林业科学,2010,46(3):134-138.
    [6]李庆,马建鑫,赵凤君,等.戒台寺和潭柘寺古树衰老的几个生理特征研究[J].湖北林业科技,2004,52(3):5-9.
    [7]张克建.桉树营养状况与诊断方法综述[J].桉树科技,2000(2):17-20.
    [8]李锦龄.古树矿质营养及细胞微区的研究[J].中国园林,1998(2):46-50.
    [9]周巍.古榕树营养诊断与复壮技术研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2015:11-16.
    [10]赵娟.植物营养水平表征古侧柏健康状况的可行性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013:15-27.
    [11]北京市林业科技推广站.DB11/T 478—2007,古树名木评价标准[S].北京:北京市质量技术监督局,2007:2-3.
    [12] Seregin I V, Shpigun L K, Ivaniov V B. Distribution and toxic effects of cadmium and lead on maize roots[J].Russ. J. Plant Physiol,2004,51:525-533.
    [13]李锦龄.北京松柏类古树濒危原因及复壮技术的研宄[J].北京园林,2001,17(1):24-27.
    [14]张利娟,杨志民,贺随超,等.不同生长势古香樟矿质营养分析[J].林业与环境科学,2011,27(6):1-8.
    [15]巢阳,丛日晨,舒建华,等[J].不同健康状况古树叶样元素含量的差异[J].北京园林2012(2):46-53.
    [16] Peterson D L, Anderson D R. Content of chemical elements in tree rings of lodgepole pine and whitebark pine from a subalpine Sierra Nevada forest.[J].Research Paper-Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service,1990:200.
    [17] Nebel B, Matile P. Longevity and senescence of needles in Pinus cembra, L[J].Trees,1992,6(3):156-161.
    [18] Fay N. Environmental arboriculture, tree ecology and veteran tree management[J].Arboricultural Association Journal,2002,26(3):213-238.
    [19]李迎.古樟树营养诊断与复壮技术研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2008:11-22.
    [20]贾文龙,邢国明.土壤矿质元素含量与古侧柏生存状态的相关性[J].山西农业科学,2010,38(9):45-47.
    [21]张国华.古树衰老状况及生理生化特性研究[D].北京:首都师范大学,2009:2-11.
    [22]常二梅.侧柏古树抗衰老分子机理研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2012:13-18.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700