应用三维磁共振成像技术探究病理性近视眼眼底病变与眼球形态的关系
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Using 3D-MRI to study the relationship between pathological myopia fundus lesion and ocular shape
  • 作者:刘向红 ; 张月玲 ; 杨娜 ; 王莉菲 ; 张建军
  • 英文作者:Liu Xianghong;Zhang Yueling;Yang Na;Wang Lifei;Zhang Jianjun;School of Chengde Medical University;Department of Ophthalmology,Baoding NO.1 Central Hospital;Department of Fundus Surgery,Hebei Eye Hospital;Department of Medical Imaging,Baoding No.1 Central Hospital;
  • 关键词:病理性近视眼 ; 眼球形态 ; 眼底病变 ; 三维磁共振成像
  • 英文关键词:Pathological myopia;;Ocular shape;;Fundus lesion;;3 Dimensions magnetic resonance imaging(3D-MRI)
  • 中文刊名:ZHYB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition)
  • 机构:承德医学院研究生院;保定市第一中心医院东院眼二科;河北省眼科医院眼底外科;保定市第一中心医院医学影像科;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 出版单位:中华眼科医学杂志(电子版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.9
  • 基金:河北省科技计划项目(152777102D)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZHYB201901006
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-9311/R
  • 分类号:44-50
摘要
目的探究病理性近视眼眼球形态在三维磁共振成像中的分型,不同类型的病理性近视眼眼底病变中各眼球形态分布,以及眼球形态与年龄、眼轴长度、屈光度及眼底病变类型的关系。方法本研究为观察性研究,将病理性近视患者58例(104只眼)按年龄分为<60岁组和≥60岁组;按眼轴长度分为<29 mm组和≥29 mm组;按屈光度分为-6. 00~-12. 00 D组、-12. 25~-18. 00 D组及≥-18. 25 D组;按眼底病变分为脉络膜新生血管组、黄斑劈裂组、黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离组及单纯脉络膜视网膜萎缩组。所有患者均接受屈光度、散瞳检查眼底、眼底照相、光学相干断层扫描血管成像及磁共振眼眶扫描检查。观察各组别中不同眼球形态的发生率及差异。结果根据临床经验和三维磁共振成像结果,将病理性近视眼球形态分为椭圆形10例(14只眼)、锥形22例(26只眼)、扭曲形24例(36只眼)、桶形20例(28只眼)。在病理性近视眼脉络膜新生血管患者10例(10只眼)中,锥形和扭曲形各4例(4只眼),占40. 0%(4/10);椭圆形2例(2只眼),占20. 0%(2/10)。黄斑劈裂患者8例(8只眼)中,扭曲形4例(4只眼),占50. 0%(4/8);桶形4例(4只眼),占50. 0%(4/8)。黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离患者6例(6只眼)中,桶形4例(4只眼),占66. 7%(4/6);扭曲形2例(2只眼),占33. 3%(2/6)。单纯脉络膜视网膜萎缩患者54例(80只眼)中,扭曲形18例(26只眼),占32. 5%(26/80);锥形18例(22只眼),占27. 5%(22/80);桶形10例(20只眼),占25. 0%(20/80);椭圆形8例(12只眼),占15. 0%(12/80)。4种眼球类型的分布差异在不同年龄组、不同眼轴组及不同屈光度组中均有统计学意义(χ~2=10. 43,44. 13,48. 93; P <0. 05),在不同病理性近视眼眼底病变组中无统计学意义(χ~2=15. 59,P> 0. 05)。结论三维磁共振成像技术能全面直观地反映眼球的具体形态,病理性近视眼眼球形态与年龄、眼轴长度及屈光度相关,病理性近视眼脉络膜新生血管、黄斑劈裂及单纯脉络膜视网膜萎缩的眼球形态偏向于扭曲形和锥形,而黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离偏向于桶形。
        Objective The aim of this study was to implore the classification of pathological myopia ocular shape in 3 dimensions magnetic resonance imaging (3 D-MRI), the incidence rate of ocular morphology classification in different pathological myopia fundus lesion,and the relationship between ocular shape and age,axis oculi length,diopter,and fundus lesion types. Methods This observational study was divided 58 pathological myopia patients (104 eyes) into groups by age (< 60 years and ≥60 years),axis oculi length (< 29 mm and ≥ 29 mm),diopter(-6. 00 to-12. 00 D,-12. 25 to-18. 00 D,and ≥-18. 25 D),and fundus lesions (pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization,foveoschisis,macular hole retinal detachment,and chorioretinal atrophy). All the patients were examined for diopter,dilated pupil for fundus examination,fundus photography,optical coherence tomography angiography,magnetic resonance orbital scanning. The incidence rate of various ocular shape and compare the differences between different age groups,axis oculi length groups,diopter groups,and fundus lesion groups was observed. Results Pathological myopia ocular shape was divided into ellipsoidal shape (10 cases,14 eyes),conical shape (22 cases,26 eyes),distorted shape (24 cases,36 eyes),and barrel shape (20 cases,28 eyes)according to clinical experiences and 3 D-MRI results. Ten cases (10 eyes) for pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization contained 4 cases (4 eyes,accounting for 40. 0% of the 10 eyes) for conical shape and distorted shape,respectively,and 2 cases (2 eyes,20. 0%) for ellipsoidal shape. Eight cases (8 eyes) for pathological myopia foveoschisis contained 4 cases (4 eyes,accounting for 50. 0% of the 8 eyes) for distorted shape,and 4 cases (4 eyes,50. 0%) for barrel shape. Six cases (6 eyes) for pathological myopia macular hole retinal detachment contained 4 cases (4 eyes,66. 7%) for barrel shape,and 2 cases (2 eyes,33. 3%) for distorted shape. Fifty-four cases (80 eyes) for pathological myopia chorioretinal atrophy contained 18 cases (26 eyes,32. 5%) for distorted shape,18 cases (22 eyes,27. 5%) for conical shape,10 cases (20 eyes,25. 0%) for barrel shape,and 8 cases (12 eyes,15. 0%) for ellipsoidal shape. The distribution of the four types ocular shape had statistical significance between different age groups,axis oculi length groups,and diopter groups (χ~2= 10. 43,44. 13,48. 93; P < 0. 05),but no in fundus lesion groups (χ~2= 15. 59,P > 0. 05). Conclusion 3 D-MRI can directly and comprehensively show ocular shape.Pathological myopia ocular shape is related to age, axis oculi length, and diopter. Ocular shape of pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization,foveoschisis,chorioretinal atrophy tend to distorted shape and conical shape,while macular hole retinal detachment did to barrel shape.
引文
[1]Vitale S,Sperduto RD,Ferris FL.Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2009,127(12):1632-1639.
    [2]He M,Zeng J,Liu Y,et al.Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2004,45(3):793-799.
    [3]Vongphanit J,Mitchell P,Wang JJ.Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in an older population[J].Ophthalmology,2002,109(4):704-711.
    [4]Resnikoff S,Pascolini D,Mariotti SP,et al.Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004[J].Bull World Health Organ,2008,86(1):63-70.
    [5]Moriyama M,Ohno-Matsui K,Hayashi K,et al.Topographic analyses of shape of eyes with pathologic myopia by highresolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging[J].Ophthalmology,2011,118(8):1626-1637.
    [6]Moriyama M,Ohno-Matsui K,Modegi T,et al.Quantitative analyses of high-resolution 3D MRI images of highly myopic eyes to determine their shapes[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2012,53(8):4510-4518.
    [7]Chang L,Pan CW,Ohno-Matsui K,et al.Myopia-related fundus changes in Singapore adults with high myopia[J].Am JOphthalmol,2013,155(6):991-999.
    [8]Gao LQ,Liu W,Liang YB,et al.Prevalence and characteristics of myopic retinopathy in a rural Chinese adult population:the Handan Eye Study[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2011,129(9):1199-1204.
    [9]Chen H,Wen F,Li H,et al.The types and severity of high myopic maculopathy in Chinese patients[J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2012,32(1):60-67.
    [10]Steidl SM,Pruett RC.Macular complications associated with posterior staphyloma[J].Am J Ophthalmol,1997,123(2):181-187.
    [11]Hsiang HW,Ohno-Matsui K,Shimada N,et al.Clinical characteristics of posterior staphyloma in eyes with pathologic myopia[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2008,146(1):102-110.
    [12]Henaine-Berra A,Zand-Hadas IM,Fromow-Guerra J,et al.Prevalence of macular anatomic abnormalities in high myopia[J].Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina,2013,44(2):140-144.
    [13]Chae JB,Moon BG,Yang SJ,et al.Macular gradient measurement in myopic posterior staphyloma using optical coherence tomography[J].Korean J Ophthalmol,2011,25(4):243-247.
    [14]Jo Y,Ikuno Y,Nishida K.Retinoschisis:a predictive factor in vitrectomy for macular holes without retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2012,96(2):197-200.
    [15]施靖容,何玉萍,赵婷婷,等.应用3D-MRI成像技术重建高度近视眼球形态[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2016,18(5):269-274.
    [16]Suda K,Hangai M,Yoshimura N.Axial length and outcomes of macular hole surgery assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2011,151(1):118-127.
    [17]Spaide RF.Staphyloma:Part 1[M].New York:Springer,2013:167-176.
    [18]Ohno-Matsui K.Proposed classification of posterior staphylomas based on analyses of eye shape by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and wide-field fundus imaging[J].Ophthalmology,2014,121(9):1798-1809.
    [19]Guo X,Xiao O,Chen Y,et al.Three-dimensional eye shape,myopic maculopathy,and visual acuity:the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center-Brien Holden Vision Institute High Myopia Cohort Study[J].Ophthalmology,2017,124(5):679-687.
    [20]Morgan I,Rose K.How genetic is school myopia?[J].Prog Retin Eye Res,2005,24(1):1-38.
    [21]Pan CW,Ramamurthy D,Saw SM.Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia[J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2012,32(1):3-16.
    [22]Morgan IG,Ohno-Matsui K,Saw SM.Myopia[J].Lancet,2012,379(9827):1739-1748.
    [23]Katz J,Tielsch JM,Sommer A.Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1997,38(2):334-340.
    [24]Attebo K,Ivers RQ,Mitchell P.Refractive errors in an older population:the Blue Mountains Eye Study[J].Ophthalmology,1999,106(6):1066-1072.
    [25]Pan CW,Wong TY,Lavanya R,et al.Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in Indians:the Singapore Indian Eye Study(SINDI)[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2011,52(6):3166-3173.
    [26]Wong TY,Foster PJ,Hee J,et al.Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2000,41(9):2486-2494.
    [27]Gilmartin B.Myopia:precedents for research in the twenty-first century[J].Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2004,32(3):305-324.
    [28]Young TL,Metlapally R,Shay AE.Complex trait genetics of refractive error[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2007,125(1):38-48.
    [29]Shimada N,Ohno-Matsui K,Nishimuta A,et al.Detection of paravascular lamellar holes and other paravascular abnormalities by optical coherence tomography in eyes with high myopia[J].Ophthalmology,2008,115(4):708-717.
    [30]Shimada N,Ohno-Matsui K,Nishimuta A,et al.Peripapillary changes detected by optical coherence tomography in eyes with high myopia[J].Ophthalmology,2007,114(11):2070-2076.
    [31]Sakaguchi H,Ikuno Y,Choi JS,et al.Multiple components of epiretinal tissues detected by triamcinolone and indocyanine green in macular hole and retinal detachment as a result of high myopia[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2004,138(6):1079-1081.
    [32]Ohno-Matsui K,Yoshida T,Futagami S,et al.Patchy atrophy and lacquer cracks predispose to the development of choroidal neovascularisation in pathological myopia[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2003,87(5):570-573.
    [33]Wakazono T,Yamashiro K,Miyake M,et al.Association between eye shape and myopic traction maculopathy in high myopia[J].Ophthalmology,2016,123(4):919-921.
    [34]Yu X,Ma W,Liu B,et al.Morphological analysis and quantitative evaluation of myopic maculopathy by threedimensional magnetic resonance imaging[J].Eye(Lond),2018,32(4):782-787.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700