基于改进CRITIC法的西部地区新型城镇化水平测度
|
摘要
针对新型城镇化研究中在赋权方面不能全面考虑指标数据的离散程度、相关程度和对比强度三大数据属性的问题,本研究利用熵值法改良CRITIC法后对指标赋权。在建立新型城镇化的评价指标体系和明确新型城镇化水平,不仅包括综合指数方面,还包含内部协调方面的基础上,测度了2007—2016年西部省份的新型城镇化水平。研究表明:2007—2016年西部各省份新型城镇化的综合指数在稳步提升;协调性方面由勉强协调、初级协调发展到了中级及良好协调阶段,但区域内部差异明显;利用Thiel指数对西部省份新型城镇化水平进行σ收敛检验,发现西部新型城镇化水平的Thiel指数曲线呈"W"状分布,σ收敛趋势不明显。最后,提出促进西部省份新型城镇化水平提升的政策建议。
In the research of new urbanization, the method of weight determination cannot fully consider the degree of dispersion, the degree of correlation and the degree of contrast. In this study, the entropy method was used to improve the CRITIC method. In this paper, an evaluation index system of new urbanization was established in order to measure the new urbanization level of western China from 2007 to 2016. Research shows that the comprehensive index of new urbanization in western China has been improving steadily from 2007 to 2016; The coordination among the internal systems of new urbanization has developed from barely coordinated and primary coordinated to intermediate and good coordinated, but there are obvious differences among the provinces in western China; Thiel index was used to test the convergence of the new urbanization level in western China, and the results show that the Thiel index curve of the new urbanization level presented a"W" distribution, and the new urbanization level did not converge. Finally, some policy suggestions were promoted in order to promote the level of new urbanization in western China.
In the research of new urbanization, the method of weight determination cannot fully consider the degree of dispersion, the degree of correlation and the degree of contrast. In this study, the entropy method was used to improve the CRITIC method. In this paper, an evaluation index system of new urbanization was established in order to measure the new urbanization level of western China from 2007 to 2016. Research shows that the comprehensive index of new urbanization in western China has been improving steadily from 2007 to 2016; The coordination among the internal systems of new urbanization has developed from barely coordinated and primary coordinated to intermediate and good coordinated, but there are obvious differences among the provinces in western China; Thiel index was used to test the convergence of the new urbanization level in western China, and the results show that the Thiel index curve of the new urbanization level presented a"W" distribution, and the new urbanization level did not converge. Finally, some policy suggestions were promoted in order to promote the level of new urbanization in western China.
引文
[1]陆大道,陈明星.关于“国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2 0 2 0)”编制大背景的几点认识[J].地理学报,2 0 1 5(2):179-185.
[2]孙丽萍,杨筠.中国西部人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调性的时空分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017(3):55-58.
[3]李霞,朱艳婷.城乡二元体制下工业化与城镇化协调发展研究[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(3):109-115.
[4]谢守红,蔡海亚,娄田田.中国各省份城镇化质量评价及空间差异分析[J].城市问题,2015(8):16-21.
[5]贺三维,邵玺.京津冀地区人口-土地-经济城镇化空间集聚及耦合协调发展研究[J].经济地理,2018(1):95-102.
[6]李红燕,邓水兰.新型城镇化评价指标体系的建立与测度--以中部六省省会城市为例[J].企业经济,2017(2):187-192.
[7]张卫国,黄晓兰,郑月龙,等.包容性城镇化与产业结构的协调发展评价[J].经济与管理研究,2016(2):28-34.
[8]田时中,方眉玉,李光龙.人口-土地-经济-社会城镇化水平测度及耦合协调分析--基于31个省份面板数据的实证[J].河北地质大学学报,2017(4):49-57.
[9]阿荣,陈才,董振华.新型城镇化视角下的内蒙古城镇化发展水平综合评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016(10):26-32.
[10]王聪,朱喜钢,王富喜.基于均方差权值法的山东省县域城镇化水平评价[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009(4):78-83.
[11]宋冬梅,刘春晓,沈晨,等.基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2015(4):1-9.
[12]Diakoulaki D,Mavrotas G,Papayannakis L.Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:The critic method[J].Computers&Operations Research,1995,22(7):763-770.
[13]张立军,张潇.基于改进CRITIC法的加权聚类方法[J].统计与决策,2015(22):65-68.
[14]李勇.区域产业耦合机制研究[J].商业经济,2010(10):31-34.
[15]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系--以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999(2):171-177.
[16]张改素,王发曾,康珈瑜,等.长江经济带县域城乡收入差距的空间格局及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2017(4):42-51.
[2]孙丽萍,杨筠.中国西部人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调性的时空分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017(3):55-58.
[3]李霞,朱艳婷.城乡二元体制下工业化与城镇化协调发展研究[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(3):109-115.
[4]谢守红,蔡海亚,娄田田.中国各省份城镇化质量评价及空间差异分析[J].城市问题,2015(8):16-21.
[5]贺三维,邵玺.京津冀地区人口-土地-经济城镇化空间集聚及耦合协调发展研究[J].经济地理,2018(1):95-102.
[6]李红燕,邓水兰.新型城镇化评价指标体系的建立与测度--以中部六省省会城市为例[J].企业经济,2017(2):187-192.
[7]张卫国,黄晓兰,郑月龙,等.包容性城镇化与产业结构的协调发展评价[J].经济与管理研究,2016(2):28-34.
[8]田时中,方眉玉,李光龙.人口-土地-经济-社会城镇化水平测度及耦合协调分析--基于31个省份面板数据的实证[J].河北地质大学学报,2017(4):49-57.
[9]阿荣,陈才,董振华.新型城镇化视角下的内蒙古城镇化发展水平综合评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016(10):26-32.
[10]王聪,朱喜钢,王富喜.基于均方差权值法的山东省县域城镇化水平评价[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009(4):78-83.
[11]宋冬梅,刘春晓,沈晨,等.基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2015(4):1-9.
[12]Diakoulaki D,Mavrotas G,Papayannakis L.Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:The critic method[J].Computers&Operations Research,1995,22(7):763-770.
[13]张立军,张潇.基于改进CRITIC法的加权聚类方法[J].统计与决策,2015(22):65-68.
[14]李勇.区域产业耦合机制研究[J].商业经济,2010(10):31-34.
[15]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系--以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999(2):171-177.
[16]张改素,王发曾,康珈瑜,等.长江经济带县域城乡收入差距的空间格局及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2017(4):42-51.