国内知识管理领域跨学科知识交流特征研究
|
摘要
交叉科学是科学创新的重要贡献者,跨学科研究是科学创新的重要方式。论文借鉴交叉学科知识交流、"无形学院"理论,综合运用引文网络分析、社会网络分析、多元统计分析的思路与方法,以UCINET,Netdraw,SPSS为工具,选取CNKI中前60种刊发知识管理论文的高被引期刊,通过追踪这些期刊的引用关系来揭示交叉学科的跨学科及学科内知识交流特征。研究发现:国内知识管理领域学科间的知识交流较为顺畅,信息失真和曲解的现象不易发生。本领域存在图书情报档案学、组织管理、教育学、计算机科学四个子群,其中图书情报档案学子群扮演着知识接受者的角色,且对其他子群间的交流影响力较强;组织管理子群、计算机科学子群分别扮演着知识中介和知识源的角色,但对其他子群之间交流的影响力较弱;教育学较少与其它子群进行跨学科知识交流。
Interdisciplinary research is an important way to innovate,while interdisciplinary science has become a significant contributor to science innovation.Using the theory of interdisciplinary knowledge communication and invisible college,citation analysis,social network analysis,multivariate statistical analysis,and analyzing tools of UCINET,Netdraw,SPSS,this article conducted an interdisciplinary analysis on the knowledge management field based on the top 60 highly-cited journals selected from CNKI,and traced its research boundary of academic community.The purpose is to discover the cross-disciplinary and inner-disciplinary features of knowledge management.The results indicate that:(1)the interdisciplinary knowledge communication of knowledge management appears to be smooth,and there are few information distortion.There are three categories of journals which act respectively as knowledge sources,knowledge receivers,and bridges for knowledge communication;(2)there are four knowledge communication across-subgroups in the field of knowledge management,namely information science,organization management,education science,and computer science.The subgroups of information science,organization management,and computer science respectively play the roles of knowledge receivers,knowledge sources,and the bridges of knowledge communication,while the subgroup of education science has little interdisciplinary knowledge communication with others.
Interdisciplinary research is an important way to innovate,while interdisciplinary science has become a significant contributor to science innovation.Using the theory of interdisciplinary knowledge communication and invisible college,citation analysis,social network analysis,multivariate statistical analysis,and analyzing tools of UCINET,Netdraw,SPSS,this article conducted an interdisciplinary analysis on the knowledge management field based on the top 60 highly-cited journals selected from CNKI,and traced its research boundary of academic community.The purpose is to discover the cross-disciplinary and inner-disciplinary features of knowledge management.The results indicate that:(1)the interdisciplinary knowledge communication of knowledge management appears to be smooth,and there are few information distortion.There are three categories of journals which act respectively as knowledge sources,knowledge receivers,and bridges for knowledge communication;(2)there are four knowledge communication across-subgroups in the field of knowledge management,namely information science,organization management,education science,and computer science.The subgroups of information science,organization management,and computer science respectively play the roles of knowledge receivers,knowledge sources,and the bridges of knowledge communication,while the subgroup of education science has little interdisciplinary knowledge communication with others.
引文
1 Goldstone R L,Leydesdorff L.The Import and Export of Cognitive Science[J].Cognitive Science,2006,30(6):983-993.
2 Hessey R,Willett P.Quantifying the Value of Knowledge Exports from Librarianship and Information Science Research[J].Journal of Information Science,2013,39(1):141-150.
3 Kiss I Z,Broom M,Craze P G,et al.Can Epidemic Models Describe the Diffusion of Topics Across Disciplines?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(1):74-82.
4 马费成,陈柏彤.我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究[J].情报科学,2015,33(4):3-8,63.
5 杜奕才.从期刊引文分析看经济学学科内部和学科间的知识交流[J].情报科学,2003,21(12)1252-1255.
6 邱均平,余厚强.跨学科发文视角下我国图书情报学跨学科研究态势分析[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(5):5-10.
7 徐晴.我国图书情报学跨学科知识转移态势研究[J].图书情报知识,2016,(3):96-102.
8 王旻霞,赵丙军.中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究——基于CCD数据库的分析[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(5):94-99.
9 孙海生.情报学跨学科知识引用实证研究[J].情报杂志,2013,32(7):113-118.
10,32张勤,马费成.国内知识管理领域知识交流结构研究——基于核心作者互引网络的分析[J].情报学报,2012,31(9):925-933.
11 杨良斌,金碧辉.跨学科研究中学科交叉度的定量分析探讨[A].刘仲林.中国交叉科学(第三卷),北京:科学出版社,2010:54-62.
12 普赖斯.小科学,大科学[M].宋剑耕,戴振飞译.北京:世界科学出版社,1982:53-79.
13 戴安娜·克兰.无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M].刘珺珺,顾昕,刘德禄译.北京:华夏出版社,1988:45-60.
14 Lievrouw L A.Reconciling Structure and Process in the Study of Scholarly Communication[A].Borgman C L.Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics.Newbury park,CA:Sage,1990:59-69.
15 Zuccala A.Modeling the Invisible College[J].Journal of the American Society for Science and Technology,2006,57(2):152-168.
16 Teixeira A A C.Mapping the(In)visible College(s)in the Field of Entrepreneurship[J].Scientometrics,2011,89(1):1-36.
17 宋丽萍,徐引篪.基于SNA的电子无形学院结构分析[J].情报学报,2007,26(6):902-908.
18 加菲尔德.引文索引法的理论及应用[M].侯汉清,陆宝树,马张华译.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004:62-63.
19 Price D J.Networks of Scientific Papers[J].Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
20 刘则渊,陈悦,侯海燕,等.科学知识图谱方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:3-11.
21 Hummon N P,Dereian P.Connectivity in a Citation Network:The Development of DNA theory[J].Social Networks,1989,11(1):39-63.
22 姜春林,唐悦,杜维滨,等.CSSCI管理学来源期刊引文网络结构分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,(7):54-58.
23 Leydesdorff L,Rafols I.Indicators of the Interdisciplinarity of Journals:Diversity,Centrality,and Citations[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):87-100.
24 Zhang L,Glnzel W,Liang L M.Tracing the Role of Individual Journals in a Cross-citation Network Based on Different Indicators[J].Scientometrics,2009,81(3):821-838.
25 Leydesdorff L,Hammarfelt B,Salah A.The structure of the Art&Humanities Citation Index:A Mapping on the Basis of Aggregated Citations Among 1157Journals[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(12):2414-2426.
26 岳洪江.管理科学知识扩散网络的结构研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):779-786.
27 周秋菊,杨立英,叶婷,等.基于期刊同被引和互引网络的学科结构和知识流动研究[J].情报杂志,2014,33(8):84-91.
28 赵蓉英,吴胜男.图书情报学期刊知识转移结构及模型研究——基于期刊互引网络分析[J].图书馆杂志,2014,(8):29-36.
29 邵瑞华,张和伟.图书情报学期刊内部知识流动分析——以2013年SSCI收录的83种图书情报学期刊为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(6):75-80.
30 刘军.整体网分析讲义——UCINET软件适用指南[M].上海:格致出版社,2009:11.
31 张紫琼,张自立,叶强,等.基于互引网络的管理科学部重要期刊内部关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,(5):66-70.
33 邱均平,王菲菲.基于CSSCI的国内情报学领域作者共被引分析[J].情报学报,2012,31(1):104-112.
34 张勤,魏国辰.基于多元统计分析与社会网络分析的国内知识管理学派探析[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(3):37-48.
35 陈琴,蒋合领.我国知识管理研究学派、知识基础及热点的可视化分析[J].情报杂志,2016,35(2):88-92,174.
36 Erjia Y,Ding Y,Cronin B,et al.A bird's-eye view of scientific trading:Dependency relations among fields of science[J].Journal of informetrics,2013,7(2),249-264.
(1)学术界从投入产出视角对期刊知识交流效率进行了比较深入的探讨(参见万莉.学术期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1160-1165),其中最关键的投入、产出指标分别为总发文数量、总被引频次。因此,本文的知识交流效率=总被引频次/总发文数量。
2 Hessey R,Willett P.Quantifying the Value of Knowledge Exports from Librarianship and Information Science Research[J].Journal of Information Science,2013,39(1):141-150.
3 Kiss I Z,Broom M,Craze P G,et al.Can Epidemic Models Describe the Diffusion of Topics Across Disciplines?[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(1):74-82.
4 马费成,陈柏彤.我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究[J].情报科学,2015,33(4):3-8,63.
5 杜奕才.从期刊引文分析看经济学学科内部和学科间的知识交流[J].情报科学,2003,21(12)1252-1255.
6 邱均平,余厚强.跨学科发文视角下我国图书情报学跨学科研究态势分析[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(5):5-10.
7 徐晴.我国图书情报学跨学科知识转移态势研究[J].图书情报知识,2016,(3):96-102.
8 王旻霞,赵丙军.中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究——基于CCD数据库的分析[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(5):94-99.
9 孙海生.情报学跨学科知识引用实证研究[J].情报杂志,2013,32(7):113-118.
10,32张勤,马费成.国内知识管理领域知识交流结构研究——基于核心作者互引网络的分析[J].情报学报,2012,31(9):925-933.
11 杨良斌,金碧辉.跨学科研究中学科交叉度的定量分析探讨[A].刘仲林.中国交叉科学(第三卷),北京:科学出版社,2010:54-62.
12 普赖斯.小科学,大科学[M].宋剑耕,戴振飞译.北京:世界科学出版社,1982:53-79.
13 戴安娜·克兰.无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M].刘珺珺,顾昕,刘德禄译.北京:华夏出版社,1988:45-60.
14 Lievrouw L A.Reconciling Structure and Process in the Study of Scholarly Communication[A].Borgman C L.Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics.Newbury park,CA:Sage,1990:59-69.
15 Zuccala A.Modeling the Invisible College[J].Journal of the American Society for Science and Technology,2006,57(2):152-168.
16 Teixeira A A C.Mapping the(In)visible College(s)in the Field of Entrepreneurship[J].Scientometrics,2011,89(1):1-36.
17 宋丽萍,徐引篪.基于SNA的电子无形学院结构分析[J].情报学报,2007,26(6):902-908.
18 加菲尔德.引文索引法的理论及应用[M].侯汉清,陆宝树,马张华译.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004:62-63.
19 Price D J.Networks of Scientific Papers[J].Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
20 刘则渊,陈悦,侯海燕,等.科学知识图谱方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:3-11.
21 Hummon N P,Dereian P.Connectivity in a Citation Network:The Development of DNA theory[J].Social Networks,1989,11(1):39-63.
22 姜春林,唐悦,杜维滨,等.CSSCI管理学来源期刊引文网络结构分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,(7):54-58.
23 Leydesdorff L,Rafols I.Indicators of the Interdisciplinarity of Journals:Diversity,Centrality,and Citations[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):87-100.
24 Zhang L,Glnzel W,Liang L M.Tracing the Role of Individual Journals in a Cross-citation Network Based on Different Indicators[J].Scientometrics,2009,81(3):821-838.
25 Leydesdorff L,Hammarfelt B,Salah A.The structure of the Art&Humanities Citation Index:A Mapping on the Basis of Aggregated Citations Among 1157Journals[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(12):2414-2426.
26 岳洪江.管理科学知识扩散网络的结构研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):779-786.
27 周秋菊,杨立英,叶婷,等.基于期刊同被引和互引网络的学科结构和知识流动研究[J].情报杂志,2014,33(8):84-91.
28 赵蓉英,吴胜男.图书情报学期刊知识转移结构及模型研究——基于期刊互引网络分析[J].图书馆杂志,2014,(8):29-36.
29 邵瑞华,张和伟.图书情报学期刊内部知识流动分析——以2013年SSCI收录的83种图书情报学期刊为例[J].情报杂志,2015,34(6):75-80.
30 刘军.整体网分析讲义——UCINET软件适用指南[M].上海:格致出版社,2009:11.
31 张紫琼,张自立,叶强,等.基于互引网络的管理科学部重要期刊内部关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,(5):66-70.
33 邱均平,王菲菲.基于CSSCI的国内情报学领域作者共被引分析[J].情报学报,2012,31(1):104-112.
34 张勤,魏国辰.基于多元统计分析与社会网络分析的国内知识管理学派探析[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(3):37-48.
35 陈琴,蒋合领.我国知识管理研究学派、知识基础及热点的可视化分析[J].情报杂志,2016,35(2):88-92,174.
36 Erjia Y,Ding Y,Cronin B,et al.A bird's-eye view of scientific trading:Dependency relations among fields of science[J].Journal of informetrics,2013,7(2),249-264.
(1)学术界从投入产出视角对期刊知识交流效率进行了比较深入的探讨(参见万莉.学术期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1160-1165),其中最关键的投入、产出指标分别为总发文数量、总被引频次。因此,本文的知识交流效率=总被引频次/总发文数量。