基于期刊引证视角的国际图书信息科学知识交流研究
|
摘要
基于期刊引证视角对国际图书信息科学知识交流状况进行探析,以期为促进该学科知识交流提供参考。以JCR收录的25种图书信息学期刊为样本,基于SBM模型测算了图书信息学期刊知识交流效率,将社会网络分析方法应用到期刊引文网络,分析了该学科内部知识交流结构以及各期刊节点的中心度。通过对国际图书信息学知识交流状况进行分析,得出以下结论:国际图书信息学期刊知识交流效率差异较大,呈现明显的两极分化;国际图书信息学内部知识交流较为集中,仍有少数期刊处于引文网络边缘;图书信息学期刊在学科内部知识交流中的地位与期刊发文质量和办刊规模等有关。
From the perspective of journal citation, this paper discusses and analyzes the knowledge exchange of International Library and Information Science, hoping to provide additional insight into the promotion of the knowledge exchange of this subject. The paper takes 25 kinds of Library and Information Science journals included in the JCR as research objects, and measures their knowledge exchange efficiency through the SBM model, then applies the social network analysis method to the journal citation network to analyze the knowledge exchange structure and the centrality degree of each periodical's node. Analysis shows that the knowledge exchange efficiencies of International Library and Information Science journals are very different with obvious polarization.The internal knowledge exchange of International Library and Information Science is concentrated, while a few journals are still on the edge of citations network.The status of the journal of Library and Information Science has a lot to do with the quality of journal and the scale of publication.
From the perspective of journal citation, this paper discusses and analyzes the knowledge exchange of International Library and Information Science, hoping to provide additional insight into the promotion of the knowledge exchange of this subject. The paper takes 25 kinds of Library and Information Science journals included in the JCR as research objects, and measures their knowledge exchange efficiency through the SBM model, then applies the social network analysis method to the journal citation network to analyze the knowledge exchange structure and the centrality degree of each periodical's node. Analysis shows that the knowledge exchange efficiencies of International Library and Information Science journals are very different with obvious polarization.The internal knowledge exchange of International Library and Information Science is concentrated, while a few journals are still on the edge of citations network.The status of the journal of Library and Information Science has a lot to do with the quality of journal and the scale of publication.
引文
[1]邱均平.信息计量学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:315-317.
[2] LINDERMAN K,CHANDRASEKARAN A.The Scholarly Exchange of Knowledge in Operations Management[J].Journal of Operations Management,2010,28(4):357-366.
[3]岳洪江,李逸舒.中国管理科学学科知识交流模式研究[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(10):85-88.
[4]彭继东,谭宗颖.纳米科技学科领域的知识交流:基于期刊引文网络的分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4):15-18.
[5]邱均平,曹洁.不同学科间知识扩散规律研究:以图书情报学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(10):1-5.
[6]曾倩,杨思洛.国内外图书情报学科知识交流的比较研究:以期刊引证分析为视角[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):114-119,108.
[7]李力,刘德洪.我国竞争情报领域主要作者知识交流结构研究:基于互引网络分析[J].情报科学,2013,31(10):70-74.
[8]王旻霞,赵丙军.中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究:基于CCD数据库的分析[J/OL].情报理论与实践,2015,38(5):94-99.
[9] MA R,YAN E.Uncovering Inter-specialty Knowledge Communication Using Author Citation Networks[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):839-854.
[10]张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析:基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):516-521,615.
[11]王惠,王树乔.图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):134-138,156.
[12]万莉,程慧平,程玉清.基于随机前沿分析方法的学术期刊知识交流效率研究[J].现代情报,2017,37(6):68-71,79.
[13]简祯富.决策分析与管理全面决策质量提升的架构与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:191-220.
[14]成刚.数据包络分析方法与MaxDEA软件[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2014:62.
[15] TONE K.A Slacks-based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
[16]刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:112-134.
[2] LINDERMAN K,CHANDRASEKARAN A.The Scholarly Exchange of Knowledge in Operations Management[J].Journal of Operations Management,2010,28(4):357-366.
[3]岳洪江,李逸舒.中国管理科学学科知识交流模式研究[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(10):85-88.
[4]彭继东,谭宗颖.纳米科技学科领域的知识交流:基于期刊引文网络的分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4):15-18.
[5]邱均平,曹洁.不同学科间知识扩散规律研究:以图书情报学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(10):1-5.
[6]曾倩,杨思洛.国内外图书情报学科知识交流的比较研究:以期刊引证分析为视角[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(10):114-119,108.
[7]李力,刘德洪.我国竞争情报领域主要作者知识交流结构研究:基于互引网络分析[J].情报科学,2013,31(10):70-74.
[8]王旻霞,赵丙军.中国图书情报学跨学科知识交流特征研究:基于CCD数据库的分析[J/OL].情报理论与实践,2015,38(5):94-99.
[9] MA R,YAN E.Uncovering Inter-specialty Knowledge Communication Using Author Citation Networks[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):839-854.
[10]张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析:基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):516-521,615.
[11]王惠,王树乔.图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):134-138,156.
[12]万莉,程慧平,程玉清.基于随机前沿分析方法的学术期刊知识交流效率研究[J].现代情报,2017,37(6):68-71,79.
[13]简祯富.决策分析与管理全面决策质量提升的架构与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:191-220.
[14]成刚.数据包络分析方法与MaxDEA软件[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2014:62.
[15] TONE K.A Slacks-based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130(3):498-509.
[16]刘军.社会网络分析导论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:112-134.