应用PDCA循环提高传染病报告质量分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Application of PDCA Cycle to Improve the Reporting Quality of Infectious Diseases
  • 作者:王文华
  • 英文作者:WANG Wenhua;Preventive Health Section, Liaocheng People's Hospital;
  • 关键词:PDCA循环 ; 质量管理 ; 传染病报告 ; 上报率 ; 时率 ; 准确率
  • 英文关键词:PDCA cycle;;quality management;;report of infectious diseases;;reporting rate;;timely rate;;accuracy rate
  • 中文刊名:WSBZ
  • 英文刊名:China Health Standard Management
  • 机构:聊城市人民医院预防保健科;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-25
  • 出版单位:中国卫生标准管理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.10
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WSBZ201902005
  • 页数:3
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-5908/R
  • 分类号:22-24
摘要
目的探究应用PDCA循环管理传染病报告质量,提高传染病报告质量的作用。方法选取2016年2月—2017年1月我院门诊部及住院部收治的传染病患者2 483例,作为对照组;2017年2月—2018年1月我院门诊部及住院部收治的传染病患者2 619例,作为观察组,并利用PDCA循环管理模式对传染病报告持续进行质量管理控制,对比分析两组患者的上报率、及时率、准确率。结果采用PDCA管理模式进行控制后,传染病报告质量提高,上报率由79.62%上升至96.26%;及时率由81.64%上升至100.00%;准确率由83.97%上升至100.00%,组间对比差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论采用PDCA循环管理进行传染病报告质量控制,能够不断强化人员上报意识,对报告进行科学与信息化管理,并持续进行质量改进,能提高传染病报告质量。
        Objective To explore the effect of applying PDCA circulation to manage the quality of infectious disease report and improve the quality of infectious disease report. Methods 2 483 patients with infectious diseases admitted to our outpatient department and inpatient department from February 2016 to January 2017 were selected as control group. From February 2017 to January 2018, 2 619 patients with infectious diseasesadmitted to the outpatient department and inpatient department of our hospital served as the observation group, and the PDCA cycle management mode was used to continuously control the quality of infectious disease reports, and the reporting rate, timely rate and accuracy rate of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The quality of infectious disease reports increased significantly with the PDCA management model, the rate of escalation increased from 79.62% to 96.26%, and the rate of timeliness increased from 81.64% to 100.00%; accuracy increased from 83.97% to 100.00%, and the contrast between groups was significantly(P < 0.05), is statistically significant. Conclusion The quality control of infectious disease report is carried out by PDCA cycle management, which can enhance the awareness of personnel reporting, scientific and information management of the report, and continuous quality improvement, can significantly improve the quality of infectious disease report.
引文
[1]刘继恒,白春林,张皓,等.宜昌市医疗机构HIS系统中开发传染病疫情报告系统模块的效果评价[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2015,26(3):46-48.
    [2]刘素红,马杰,李霞.银川市2014年医疗机构传染病漏报调查与报告质量评价[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2016,38(4):428-431.
    [3]陈伟,赵晓静,张杰,等.河南省2012年医疗机构法定传染病疫情报告质量调查[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(11):2088-2091.
    [4]郭青,张春曦,王晓风,等. 2013年度全国法定传染病信息报告质量和管理现状调查[J].疾病监测,2015,30(2):145-149.
    [5]康锴,李凤丽,吴琼,等.医疗信息系统应用于传染病报告管理中的效果探析[J].中国卫生产业,2016,13(10):125-127.
    [6]索继江,邢玉斌,杜明梅,等.医院传染病实时监控及预警系统的功能设计与实现[J].中国医院,2013,17(3):11-13.
    [7]陈丽,李妍,肖红,等. PDCA循环法对降低会阴切口感染的探讨[J].护士进修杂志,2014,29(10):893-895.
    [8]蒋敏,徐文伟,褚丽娜.加强管理提高传染病疫情报告质量[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(15):332-333.
    [9]江雪珍.医院加强传染病疫情监测报告质量管理实践[J].现代医院管理,2018,16(3):44-45.
    [10]赵惠云,张红艳.传染病报告漏报原因分析与对策[J].内蒙古中医药,2014,33(22):114.
    [11]叶小文,程致远,龚绍芹,等.应用PDCA循环提高传染病报告质量[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2018,29(1):30-32.
    [12]温新玲.湖北省疾控机构信息化建设与展望[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2014,25(1):119-120.
    [13]谢多希,李志平.实施持续质量改进提高传染病疫情报告质量的效果评价[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2014,24(7):1784-1786.
    [14]施宗湖,李星霖.医院信息系统在提高传染病疫情报告质量中的作用[J].中国临床新医学,2014,23(7):635-637.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700