传统术式与宫腔镜下切除术治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果对比
|
摘要
目的:比较传统术式与宫腔镜下切除术治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果。方法:将笔者所在医院收治的120例宫颈息肉患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各60例,对照组采用传统术式进行治疗,治疗组采用宫腔镜下切除术进行治疗,比较两组的临床效果及复发率。结果:治疗组总有效率及复发率分别为90.00%、6.67%,对照组分别为76.67%、30.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:宫腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果显著,可作为临床首选的治疗方案。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of traditional surgery and resection under hysteroscopy in the treatment of cervical polyps.Method:120 cases of cervical polyp were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,60 cases in eac.The control group was treated with conventional surgery.The treatment group was treated by resection under hysteroscopy.The clinical effect and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared.Result:The total effective rate and recurrence rate of the treatment group were 90% and 6.67% respectively,and those of the control group were 76.67% and 30% respectively,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of resection under hysteroscopy on cervical polyps is remarkable.It is the first choice of treatment.
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of traditional surgery and resection under hysteroscopy in the treatment of cervical polyps.Method:120 cases of cervical polyp were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,60 cases in eac.The control group was treated with conventional surgery.The treatment group was treated by resection under hysteroscopy.The clinical effect and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared.Result:The total effective rate and recurrence rate of the treatment group were 90% and 6.67% respectively,and those of the control group were 76.67% and 30% respectively,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of resection under hysteroscopy on cervical polyps is remarkable.It is the first choice of treatment.
引文
[1]耿彦利.139例宫腔镜宫颈息肉切除术临床疗效观察[J].医学信息,2015,28(9):323.
[2]蔡志伟.宫腔电切镜治疗宫颈息肉的临床探析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(11):178-179.
[3]马小涵.宫腔镜电切术治疗宫颈息肉的疗效观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(5):177-118.
[4]任丽霞,宁艳,宁丽.比较传统术式与官腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床疗效[J].中国卫生产业,2013,12(1):104-105.
[5]周世平.传统术式与宫腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果比较[J].中国医学创新,2012,9(20):32-33.
[6]黎瑞英,黄慈芳.96例宫颈息肉的临床分析[J].内蒙古中医药,2011,16(14):26-28.
[7]徐雪芬,潘芬华,王华峰.宫颈息肉摘除术后两种不同疗法疗效分析[J].中国基层医药,2012,9(20):74-76.
[8]柯学礼,胡文格,何素琼,等.宫腔镜与腹腔镜联合应用在筋膜内子宫切除术中的临床应用[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(7):121-123.
[9]李豫萍,秦红.米索前列醇在宫腔镜电切手术中软化宫颈的效果分析[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2012,13(22):131.
[10]刘琛姝,梁梅芬,曾敬芳.宫腔镜联合左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器治疗复发性子宫内膜息肉疗效观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2015,3(5):68-69.
[2]蔡志伟.宫腔电切镜治疗宫颈息肉的临床探析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(11):178-179.
[3]马小涵.宫腔镜电切术治疗宫颈息肉的疗效观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(5):177-118.
[4]任丽霞,宁艳,宁丽.比较传统术式与官腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床疗效[J].中国卫生产业,2013,12(1):104-105.
[5]周世平.传统术式与宫腔镜下切除术式治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果比较[J].中国医学创新,2012,9(20):32-33.
[6]黎瑞英,黄慈芳.96例宫颈息肉的临床分析[J].内蒙古中医药,2011,16(14):26-28.
[7]徐雪芬,潘芬华,王华峰.宫颈息肉摘除术后两种不同疗法疗效分析[J].中国基层医药,2012,9(20):74-76.
[8]柯学礼,胡文格,何素琼,等.宫腔镜与腹腔镜联合应用在筋膜内子宫切除术中的临床应用[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(7):121-123.
[9]李豫萍,秦红.米索前列醇在宫腔镜电切手术中软化宫颈的效果分析[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2012,13(22):131.
[10]刘琛姝,梁梅芬,曾敬芳.宫腔镜联合左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器治疗复发性子宫内膜息肉疗效观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2015,3(5):68-69.