少数民族中学生攻击性结构与合作竞争人格倾向的关系
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Association between aggressive structure and cooperative and competitive personality among ethnic middle school students in Guizhou Province
  • 作者:于格 ; 卢晓灵 ; 谢一心 ; 张妍
  • 英文作者:YU Ge;LU Xiaoling;XIE Yixin;ZHANG Yan;School of Education Science and Music,Liupanshui Normal University;
  • 关键词:少数民族 ; 学生 ; 攻击 ; 人格 ; 合作行为 ; 竞争行为
  • 英文关键词:Minority groups;;Students;;Aggression;;Personality;;Cooperative behavior;;Competitive behavior
  • 中文刊名:XIWS
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of School Health
  • 机构:六盘水师范学院教育音乐学院;六盘水市第五中学;六盘水市第一中学;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-26 15:39
  • 出版单位:中国学校卫生
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.39;No.294
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(14CMZ033)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XIWS201806023
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:34-1092/R
  • 分类号:73-76
摘要
目的探讨少数民族中学生攻击性结构与合作、竞争人格倾向的关系,为改善少数民族中学生心理健康状况提供参考。方法对贵州省7所学校1 457名中学生进行问卷调查,随机抽取115名中学生进行内隐联想测验。结果外显攻击性总分和内隐攻击性得分民族差异无统计学意义;少数民族中学生的言语攻击得分低于汉族中学生,合作人格倾向得分、竞争人格倾向的自我成长因子得分均高于汉族中学生(t值分别为-2.09,3.94,2.44,P值均<0.05);少数民族中学生的外显攻击性与合作人格倾向呈负相关,与竞争人格倾向呈正相关(r值分别为-0.10,0.31,P值均<0.01),内隐攻击性与合作、竞争人格倾向的相关性无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论言语攻击、合作人格倾向与自我成长存在民族差异;少数民族中学生的外显攻击性与合作、竞争人格倾向关系密切,而内隐攻击性与合作、竞争人格倾向没有显著关联。
        Objective To explore the association between aggressive structure, cooperative and competitive personality among ethnic middle school students, and to provide a reference for improving their mental health. Methods A total of 1 457 students from 7 schools in Guizhou Province completed the questionnaires, 115 students selected randomly from the group implemented the implicit association test( IAT). Results There was no obvious difference in the scores of explicit and implicit aggressiveness between ethnic middle school students and Han middle school students. Ethnic middle school students had lower score in verbal attack than Han middle school students. Ethnic middle school students had higher self-growth score in the inclination of cooperative and competitive personality than Han middle school students( t =-2. 09, 3. 91, 2. 44, P < 0. 05). Ethnic middle school students' explicit aggressiveness was negatively correlated with cooperative personality, positively correlated with competitive personality( r =-0.10, 0.31, P<0.01). There was no significant correlation between implicit aggressiveness, cooperative and competitive personality in ethnic middle school students( P>0.05). Conclusion Ethnic middle school students' verbal attack, cooperative personality and self-growth are different from Han middle school students. Their explicit aggressiveness is closely related with cooperative and competitive personality among ethnic middle school students, while implicit aggressiveness is not closely related to cooperative and competitive personality.
引文
[1]南晓薇,余毅震,杨奕,等.中学生攻击性与移情情绪管理能力的关系[J].中国学校卫生,2014,35(3):339-342,345.
    [2]SUTER M,PIHET S,RIDDER J,et al.Implicit attitudes and self-concepts towards transgression and aggression:differences between male community and offender adolescents,and associations with psychopathic traits[J].J Adoles,2014,37(5):669-680.
    [3]CLUDIUS B,SCHMIDT A F,MORITZ S,et al.Implicit aggressiveness in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder as assessed by an Implicit Association Test[J].J Behav Ther Exp Psy,2017,55(3):106-112.
    [4]REINGLE J M,MALDONADO-MOLINA M M,JENNINGS W G,et al.Racial/Ethnic differences in trajectories of aggression in a longitudinal sample of high-risk,urban youth[J].J Adoles Health,2012,51(1):45-52.
    [5]CRAIG W,HAREL-FISCH Y,FOGEL-GRINVALD H,et al.A crossnational profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40countries[J].Int J Env Res Pub Health,2009,54(2):216-224.
    [6]NANSEL T R,CRAIG W,OVERPECK M D,et al.Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment[J].Arch Pediat Adoles Med,2004,158(8):730-736.
    [7]STAPEL D A,KOOMEN W.Competition,cooperation,and the effects of others on me[J].J Pers Soc Psychol,2005,88(6):1029-1038.
    [8]CHOI J,JOHNSON D W,JOHNSON R.Relationships among cooperative learning experiences,social interdependence,children's aggression,victimization,and prosocial behaviors[J].J Appl Soc Psychol,2011,41(4):976-1003.
    [9]王声湧,林汉生.伤害流行病学现场研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:200-203.
    [10]谢晓非,余媛媛,陈曦,等.合作与竞争人格倾向测量[J].心理学报,2006,38(1):116-125.
    [11]云祥,李小平,杨建伟.暴力犯内隐攻击性研究[J].心理学探新,2009,29(2):62-65.
    [12]魏国红.加强民族交往和谐民族关系[J].贵州民族研究,2008,28(1):13-17.
    [13]刘寅,陈正根,张雨青,等.创伤后应激障碍的民族差异问题[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(10):1511-1517.
    [14]李秋洪.广西民族交往心理的比较研究[J].民族研究,1997(1):19-31.
    [15]周雪雯,郑雪,严标宾.大学生竞争心理量表在中学生群体中的试用及修订[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008(3):132-137.
    [16]ADACHI P J,WILLOUGHBY T.Demolishing the competition:the longitudinal link between competitive video games,competitive gambling,and aggression[J].J Youth Adoles,2013,42(7):1090-104.
    [17]JERABECK J M,FERGUSON C J.The influence of solitary and cooperative violent video game play on aggressive and prosocial behavior[J].Comput Hum Behav,2013,29(6):2573-2578.
    [18]杨光辉,周宗奎,王宁丹.攻击的结构与测量范式[J].心理科学,2010,33(4):922-924.
    [19]卢晓灵,李海君,王荣燕,等.贵州省中学生攻击性结构与合作竞争人格倾向的关系[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(4):550-553.
    [20]徐凯.洛阳市中学生攻击性现状及其与性别角色冲突的相关性[J].中国学校卫生,2015,36(10):1513-1516.
    [21]段东园,程琪,张学民,等.中学生消极人际关系、焦虑、暴力媒体接触程度和攻击行为的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,34(2):281-284,287.
    [22]顾璇,姚荣英,李红影,等.中学生攻击行为及其影响因素路径分析[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(2):155-157.
    [23]李腾飞,张良,潘斌,等.马基雅维利主义对攻击行为的影响:同伴信念的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(3):523-526.
    [24]金盛华.社会心理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:305-307.
    [25]李静华,郑涌.内隐/外显不同水平攻击者的注意偏向:行为和ERP证据[J].心理科学,2014,37(1):40-47.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700