特定配伍药物冲击松解术治疗椎动脉型颈椎病急性期的临床观察
|
摘要
目的:研究特定配伍药物冲击松解术治疗椎动脉型颈椎病急性发作期的临床疗效。方法:将选取的74例椎动脉型颈椎病患者按随机数字表法分为2组分别进行特定配伍药物冲击松解术疗法(治疗组)和传统疗法(对照组)治疗。采用椎动脉型颈椎病功能评定量表(Vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis functional assessment scale,FS-CSA)评分和总有效率评价分析两种方法疗效。结果:治疗组评分低于对照组差异有统计学意义,总有效率分析结果显示治疗组总有效率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论:特定配伍药物冲击松解术疗法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病急性发作期疗效显著,明显优于传统疗法,是临床治疗椎动脉型颈椎病急性期的一种新疗法,值得临床应用与推广。
Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of specific combination of drug impact relaxation in the treatment of vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis acute attack stage. Methods: 74 Patients with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type were randomly divided into two groups,respectively,with specific combination of drug impact relaxation therapy( treatment group) and traditional therapy( control group) treatment. The efficacy of the two methods was analyzed by using the evaluation scale of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis( vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis functional assessment) and total efficiency. Results: The treatment group score was lower than the control group,the difference was significantly( P05); Total efficiency analysis showed that the total effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than the control group,the difference was significantly( P05). Conclusion: The treatment of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis with specific combination drug impact relaxation therapy is significantly better than traditional therapy,and it is a new therapy for the treatment of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis in the acute stage,which is worthy of clinical application and popularization.
Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of specific combination of drug impact relaxation in the treatment of vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis acute attack stage. Methods: 74 Patients with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type were randomly divided into two groups,respectively,with specific combination of drug impact relaxation therapy( treatment group) and traditional therapy( control group) treatment. The efficacy of the two methods was analyzed by using the evaluation scale of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis( vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis functional assessment) and total efficiency. Results: The treatment group score was lower than the control group,the difference was significantly( P05); Total efficiency analysis showed that the total effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than the control group,the difference was significantly( P05). Conclusion: The treatment of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis with specific combination drug impact relaxation therapy is significantly better than traditional therapy,and it is a new therapy for the treatment of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis in the acute stage,which is worthy of clinical application and popularization.
引文
[1]张咏,冉启川.综合康复治疗颈椎病疗效观察[J].中华保健医学杂志,2014,16(5):382.
[2]赵定麟.第三届颈椎病专题座谈会纪要[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(23):1796-1799.
[3]陈建华,樊德群,尤建华.椎动脉型颈椎病牵引重量分析[J].中国伤残医学,2009,17(3):90-91.
[4]魏毅,梁伟雄,蔡业峰.建立椎动脉型颈椎病的功能评定量表[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(26):219-221.
[5]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1999:203-240.
[6]胡云,刘菊英,彭力.星状神经节阻滞结合推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2008,23(9):833-834.
[7]梁国伟.颈椎牵引联合低频电刺激治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2010,32(10):789.
[8]刘浩伟,赵亚男,陆福,等.冲击松解疗法联合针刺治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2017,23(6):858-860.
[2]赵定麟.第三届颈椎病专题座谈会纪要[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(23):1796-1799.
[3]陈建华,樊德群,尤建华.椎动脉型颈椎病牵引重量分析[J].中国伤残医学,2009,17(3):90-91.
[4]魏毅,梁伟雄,蔡业峰.建立椎动脉型颈椎病的功能评定量表[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(26):219-221.
[5]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1999:203-240.
[6]胡云,刘菊英,彭力.星状神经节阻滞结合推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2008,23(9):833-834.
[7]梁国伟.颈椎牵引联合低频电刺激治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2010,32(10):789.
[8]刘浩伟,赵亚男,陆福,等.冲击松解疗法联合针刺治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2017,23(6):858-860.