探究糖尿病肾病患者进行血液透析的护理干预措施
|
摘要
目的探讨分析糖尿病肾病患者接受血液透析护理的临床效果,为临床护理提供参考。方法根据2015年5月—2017年5月我院接收的糖尿病肾病血液透析患者80例来分析研究,将患者分成了对照组和观察组,均有40例,对照组使用常规护理方式,观察组使用常规护理和综合护理措施,对两组的并发症和满意度进行对比分析。结果观察组满意度是95.0%(38/40),对照组满意度是77.5%(31/40)。观察组有19例并发症,并发症发生率是47.5%;对照组有30例并发症,并发症发生率是75.0%。观察组的并发症发生率比对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论糖尿病肾病采取透析治疗,需要使用综合护理干预,降低并发症发生率。
Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of hemodialysis nursing for patients with diabetic nephropathy, so as to provide reference for clinical nursing. Methods According to 80 cases of diabetic nephropathy hemodialysis patients received in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017, the patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group used routine nursing methods, while the observation group used routine nursing and comprehensive nursing measures. The complications and satisfaction of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The satisfaction rate of the observation group was 95.0%(38/40) and that of the control group was 77.5%(31/40). There were 19 complications in the observation group(47.5%) and 30 complications in the control group(75.0%). The incidence of complications in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Diabetic nephropathy treated with dialysis requires comprehensive nursing intervention to reduce the risk of complications.
Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of hemodialysis nursing for patients with diabetic nephropathy, so as to provide reference for clinical nursing. Methods According to 80 cases of diabetic nephropathy hemodialysis patients received in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017, the patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group used routine nursing methods, while the observation group used routine nursing and comprehensive nursing measures. The complications and satisfaction of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The satisfaction rate of the observation group was 95.0%(38/40) and that of the control group was 77.5%(31/40). There were 19 complications in the observation group(47.5%) and 30 complications in the control group(75.0%). The incidence of complications in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Diabetic nephropathy treated with dialysis requires comprehensive nursing intervention to reduce the risk of complications.
引文
[1]孙小莉.舒适化护理干预对血液透析糖尿病肾病患者的护理效果观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(7):961-962.
[2]付柏籽,任崔崔,宋会华.糖尿病肾病血液透析患者家庭护理干预的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2016,29(15):201-202.
[3]李漫,孟祥峰.综合护理干预用于糖尿病肾病血液透析患者的价值研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2016,16(57):249.
[4]刘颖,张春艳.认知护理干预在糖尿病肾病行血液透析患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(10):37-38.
[5]卢竹仙.论糖尿病肾病血液透析患者家庭护理干预的效果研究[J].糖尿病新世界,2015(22):149-151.
[6]高云.糖尿病肾病血液透析患者应用综合护理干预的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(5):256-257.
[7]白锐.对接受维持性血液透析治疗的尿毒症患者进行综合护理的效果探究[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(18):205-206.
[8]郭加云,隋艳丽.综合护理干预在糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中的应用效果观察[J].中国保健营养,2018,28(31):262.
[9]张晶晶.对接受血液透析治疗的患者进行综合护理的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(2):278-279.
[10]吴金仙,李呈芹.对行血液透析治疗的终末期糖尿病肾病患者进行个性化护理的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(17):144-145.
[11]王金莲.糖尿病合并肾病血液透析患者的护理措施及效果[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(6):213-214.
[12]宋鹏娟,尹保奇.对糖尿病合并肾病血液透析患者实施舒适护理的临床疗效观察[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2016(2):10-11.
[2]付柏籽,任崔崔,宋会华.糖尿病肾病血液透析患者家庭护理干预的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2016,29(15):201-202.
[3]李漫,孟祥峰.综合护理干预用于糖尿病肾病血液透析患者的价值研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2016,16(57):249.
[4]刘颖,张春艳.认知护理干预在糖尿病肾病行血液透析患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(10):37-38.
[5]卢竹仙.论糖尿病肾病血液透析患者家庭护理干预的效果研究[J].糖尿病新世界,2015(22):149-151.
[6]高云.糖尿病肾病血液透析患者应用综合护理干预的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(5):256-257.
[7]白锐.对接受维持性血液透析治疗的尿毒症患者进行综合护理的效果探究[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(18):205-206.
[8]郭加云,隋艳丽.综合护理干预在糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中的应用效果观察[J].中国保健营养,2018,28(31):262.
[9]张晶晶.对接受血液透析治疗的患者进行综合护理的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(2):278-279.
[10]吴金仙,李呈芹.对行血液透析治疗的终末期糖尿病肾病患者进行个性化护理的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(17):144-145.
[11]王金莲.糖尿病合并肾病血液透析患者的护理措施及效果[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(6):213-214.
[12]宋鹏娟,尹保奇.对糖尿病合并肾病血液透析患者实施舒适护理的临床疗效观察[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2016(2):10-11.