机场侧向跑道运行模式与容量仿真研究
|
摘要
侧向跑道在我国大型机场规划设计中逐步推广应用,研究侧向跑道与邻近平行跑道系统的运行模式和不同模式下的运行容量对于指导未来机场建设具有重要意义。对侧向跑道与邻近平行跑道的使用模式进行系统分析,提出4种运行相关性与起降放行间隔:独立运行、起飞相关运行、起降相关运行和完全相关运行。以成都新机场为例,应用SIMMOD仿真软件对跑道不同运行模式与相关性进行模拟分析。仿真结果表明,在独立运行条件下,侧向跑道与邻近平行跑道可满足的高峰起降容量约为75~77架次/小时;起降相关运行对一组跑道容量的影响大于起飞相关运行;在完全相关运行条件下起降容量最低,约为65架次/小时,较之其他模式容量下降约6%~16%。
The planning and design of the lateral runway is gradually applied in the construction of large airports of China. The research on the operational pattern and corresponding capacity of the lateral runway and adjacent parallel runway system( LR and APR) is of great significance for guiding the construction of the future airport. First,the different utilization modes of LR and APR were analyzed. Then four operational correlations and intervals were discussed,i. e. : correlated operation,take-off correlated operation,take-off and landing correlated operation and fully correlated operation. Taking Chengdu new airport as an example,the airfield simulation models were established to evaluate the efficiency of LR and APR. The simulation result suggests that a group of LR and APR can meet the hourly take-off and landing movements of about 75 ~ 77 in the case of correlated operation. The take-off and landing correlated operation has greater impact on capacity than take-off correlated operation. In the case of fully correlated operation,the runway capacity is lowest( only 65 movements/hour),lower by about 6% ~ 16% compared with other conditions.
The planning and design of the lateral runway is gradually applied in the construction of large airports of China. The research on the operational pattern and corresponding capacity of the lateral runway and adjacent parallel runway system( LR and APR) is of great significance for guiding the construction of the future airport. First,the different utilization modes of LR and APR were analyzed. Then four operational correlations and intervals were discussed,i. e. : correlated operation,take-off correlated operation,take-off and landing correlated operation and fully correlated operation. Taking Chengdu new airport as an example,the airfield simulation models were established to evaluate the efficiency of LR and APR. The simulation result suggests that a group of LR and APR can meet the hourly take-off and landing movements of about 75 ~ 77 in the case of correlated operation. The take-off and landing correlated operation has greater impact on capacity than take-off correlated operation. In the case of fully correlated operation,the runway capacity is lowest( only 65 movements/hour),lower by about 6% ~ 16% compared with other conditions.
引文
[1]李雄,李冬宾,卫东选.机场典型平行跑道容量仿真分析[J].计算机应用,2012,32(9):2648-2651.
[2]Gilbo E P.Airport capacity:representation,estimation,optimization[J].IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,2002,1(3):144-154.
[3]余江,王大海,蒲云.跑道容量的概率模型及容量曲线[J].交通运输工程学报,2002,2(4):99-102.
[4]陈勇,曹义华,周勇.北京首都国际机场容量评估研究[J].飞行力学,2005,23(4):86-89.
[5]郭海琦,朱金福.近距平行跑道容量及延误水平计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2008,8(4):68-72.
[6]陈欣.机场空侧容量评估与优化方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2007.
[7]康瑞,杨凯.考虑跑滑结构的机场跑道容量评估模型[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版),2016,53(2):319-325.
[8]Wang Chao,Zhang Xinyue,Xu Xiaohao.Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD[C]//International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design.IEEE,2008:87-90.
[9]Gao Wei,Jiang Siyuan.Simulation study on closely spaced parallel runway analysis using SIMMOD plus[C]//International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation.IEEE,2010:344-347.
[10]高伟,黄朝伟.重庆机场终端区容量评估的仿真研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2010,28(5):1-4.
[11]鱼海洋,胡华清,姚津津.机场航空容量评估的计算机仿真方法[J].空中交通管理,2009(2):21-25.
[12]Li Xiong,Li Dongbin,Wei Dongxuan,et al.Utilization pattern of closely spaced parallel runways and simulation of operational efficiency[C]//International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing.IEEE,2016:158-162.
[13]Huang A S,Schleicher D,Hunter G.Future flight demand generation tool[R].AIAA-2004-6200,2004.
[14]严煜,朱代武,张庆.交叉跑道尾流间隔研究[J].中国科技信息,2016(7):43-47.
[15]孙宁,陈肯,王振.成都新机场交叉跑道管制运行模式[J].中国科技信息,2016(19):59-61.
[16]FAA.Airport capacity and delay(AC 150/5060-5)[R].US:Federal Aviation Administration,1995.
[2]Gilbo E P.Airport capacity:representation,estimation,optimization[J].IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,2002,1(3):144-154.
[3]余江,王大海,蒲云.跑道容量的概率模型及容量曲线[J].交通运输工程学报,2002,2(4):99-102.
[4]陈勇,曹义华,周勇.北京首都国际机场容量评估研究[J].飞行力学,2005,23(4):86-89.
[5]郭海琦,朱金福.近距平行跑道容量及延误水平计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2008,8(4):68-72.
[6]陈欣.机场空侧容量评估与优化方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2007.
[7]康瑞,杨凯.考虑跑滑结构的机场跑道容量评估模型[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版),2016,53(2):319-325.
[8]Wang Chao,Zhang Xinyue,Xu Xiaohao.Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD[C]//International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design.IEEE,2008:87-90.
[9]Gao Wei,Jiang Siyuan.Simulation study on closely spaced parallel runway analysis using SIMMOD plus[C]//International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation.IEEE,2010:344-347.
[10]高伟,黄朝伟.重庆机场终端区容量评估的仿真研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2010,28(5):1-4.
[11]鱼海洋,胡华清,姚津津.机场航空容量评估的计算机仿真方法[J].空中交通管理,2009(2):21-25.
[12]Li Xiong,Li Dongbin,Wei Dongxuan,et al.Utilization pattern of closely spaced parallel runways and simulation of operational efficiency[C]//International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing.IEEE,2016:158-162.
[13]Huang A S,Schleicher D,Hunter G.Future flight demand generation tool[R].AIAA-2004-6200,2004.
[14]严煜,朱代武,张庆.交叉跑道尾流间隔研究[J].中国科技信息,2016(7):43-47.
[15]孙宁,陈肯,王振.成都新机场交叉跑道管制运行模式[J].中国科技信息,2016(19):59-61.
[16]FAA.Airport capacity and delay(AC 150/5060-5)[R].US:Federal Aviation Administration,1995.