全套护理模式对尿毒症患者净化效果及生活质量的影响
|
摘要
目的探讨不同血液净化护理模式对尿毒症患者的净化效果以及生活质量的影响。方法选取2017年1—12月我院收治的尿毒症患者80例,随即将其分为对照组和研究组,对照组采取常规护理模式,研究组采取全套护理模式对患者进行护理,通过对两组患者的不同护理,观察其护理效果以及患者今后的生活质量。结果研究组的血液净化效果高于对照组(P <0.05),研究组患者的生活质量明显优于对照组(P <0.05)。结论对于尿毒症患者,采用全套护理模式具有良好的净化效果,并且较大程度上提高了患者的生活水平。
Objective To explore the influence of different blood purification and nursing modes on the purification effect and quality of life of patients with uremia. Methods 80 uremic patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2017 were divided into the control group and the study group. The control group was given the conventional nursing mode. The study group was given the complete nursing model to nursing the patients. Through the different nursing of the two groups, the nursing effect and the life quality of the patients were observed. Results The blood purification effect of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05), and the quality of life of the study group patients was significantly better than that of the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion For patients with uremia, complete nursing model has good purification effect, and improve the living standard of patients to a large extent, which has certain clinical significance.
Objective To explore the influence of different blood purification and nursing modes on the purification effect and quality of life of patients with uremia. Methods 80 uremic patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2017 were divided into the control group and the study group. The control group was given the conventional nursing mode. The study group was given the complete nursing model to nursing the patients. Through the different nursing of the two groups, the nursing effect and the life quality of the patients were observed. Results The blood purification effect of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P < 0.05), and the quality of life of the study group patients was significantly better than that of the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion For patients with uremia, complete nursing model has good purification effect, and improve the living standard of patients to a large extent, which has certain clinical significance.
引文
[1]钟广芝,邢天柱.不同血液净化模式对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒及生活质量的影响[J].临床肾脏病杂志,2016,16(4):236-239.
[2]黄静,曹翠明,张杰,等.不同血液净化方式对尿毒症病人并发症、生活质量及营养状况的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(26):3324-3326.
[3]苏红艳,张俊全,邢维荣.全程护理模式对肺结核咯血患者康复效果及生活质量的影响[J].重庆医学,2017,46(A01):199-201.
[4]朱彩云.针对慢性尿毒症血液透析患者开展综合护理的临床观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2014,18(18):102-103,106.
[5]刘月.护理程序对尿毒症血液透析患者净化效果及生活质量的影响分析[J].医药前沿,2016,6(23):53-54.
[6]王叙芬,黄兵.不同血液净化方式对尿毒症钙磷代谢紊乱患者血磷、钙磷乘积和甲状旁腺激素水平的影响[J].海南医学,2017,28(14):2354-2356.
[7]武煜,王玲,张成标.两种血液净化方式对降低维持性血液透析并发症及提高生活质量的效果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(24):3446-3447.
[8]黄捷波.不同血液净化方式对慢性肾衰竭患者透析充分性及血清β2-MG的影响[J].中国临床研究,2016,29(5):645-647.
[9]杨冉,王韫芳,薄庆.综合护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者心理状态、并发症及生活质量的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(17):2636-2638.
[10]符霞,宋利,陈新红,等.血液净化中心工作模式与护士工作生活质量相关性研究[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(11):69-71.
[11]王浩,童皖宁,冯冰,等.不同血液净化方式改善老年尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒效果观察[J].人民军医,2016,59(11):1156-1158.
[12]李颖,韩彤,葛霞.延续性护理对尿毒症血液透析患者自我管理能力的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(8):166-168.
[13]丘宝珍.SSR反应评价不同血液净化方式治疗尿毒症神经病变患者的临床效果[J].热带医学杂志,2017,17(1):100-102.
[2]黄静,曹翠明,张杰,等.不同血液净化方式对尿毒症病人并发症、生活质量及营养状况的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(26):3324-3326.
[3]苏红艳,张俊全,邢维荣.全程护理模式对肺结核咯血患者康复效果及生活质量的影响[J].重庆医学,2017,46(A01):199-201.
[4]朱彩云.针对慢性尿毒症血液透析患者开展综合护理的临床观察[J].实用临床医药杂志,2014,18(18):102-103,106.
[5]刘月.护理程序对尿毒症血液透析患者净化效果及生活质量的影响分析[J].医药前沿,2016,6(23):53-54.
[6]王叙芬,黄兵.不同血液净化方式对尿毒症钙磷代谢紊乱患者血磷、钙磷乘积和甲状旁腺激素水平的影响[J].海南医学,2017,28(14):2354-2356.
[7]武煜,王玲,张成标.两种血液净化方式对降低维持性血液透析并发症及提高生活质量的效果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(24):3446-3447.
[8]黄捷波.不同血液净化方式对慢性肾衰竭患者透析充分性及血清β2-MG的影响[J].中国临床研究,2016,29(5):645-647.
[9]杨冉,王韫芳,薄庆.综合护理干预对尿毒症血液透析患者心理状态、并发症及生活质量的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(17):2636-2638.
[10]符霞,宋利,陈新红,等.血液净化中心工作模式与护士工作生活质量相关性研究[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(11):69-71.
[11]王浩,童皖宁,冯冰,等.不同血液净化方式改善老年尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒效果观察[J].人民军医,2016,59(11):1156-1158.
[12]李颖,韩彤,葛霞.延续性护理对尿毒症血液透析患者自我管理能力的影响[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(8):166-168.
[13]丘宝珍.SSR反应评价不同血液净化方式治疗尿毒症神经病变患者的临床效果[J].热带医学杂志,2017,17(1):100-102.