危害性矩阵分析方法关键问题研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Key Problems of Criticality Matrix Analysis Method
  • 作者:郝恒 ; 曹海斌 ; 张康 ; 杜一凡
  • 英文作者:HAO Heng;CAO Haibin;ZHANG Kang;DU Yifan;State Key Laboratory of Deep-sea Manned Vehicles,China Ship Scientific Research Center;
  • 关键词:危害性矩阵 ; 坐标划分 ; 非单点故障 ; 定量计算
  • 英文关键词:criticality matrix;;coordinate division;;non-single point of failure;;quantitative calculation
  • 中文刊名:HJHK
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University
  • 机构:中国船舶科学研究中心深海载人装备国家重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 出版单位:海军航空工程学院学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.34;No.164
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51779232)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HJHK201901007
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:37-1311/V
  • 分类号:42-48+65
摘要
针对危害性矩阵分析过程中遇到的困难及采用手工绘图效率低、精度低的问题,文章对危害性矩阵分析的斜率取值、坐标划分、非单点故障的处理、危害性定量计算公式等关键问题进行研究。结合工程实际提出了一种纵坐标为对数坐标的矩阵图绘制方法,阐明了单点故障与非单点故障在故障影响概率取值上的差异,指出了危害度与危害性的区别与联系,推导了故障模式危害性定量计算公式。以某军机升降舵操纵分系统为例,进行了故障模式危害性分析,结果表明,改进的危害性矩阵方法合理有效、效率与精度高。
        Difficulty exists in criticality matrix analysis, and the efficiency and accuracy of hand-made matrix is low. The slope value, coordinate division, treating of non-single point of failure and quantitative calculation formula were studied.Firstly, the drawing method of criticality matrix with logarithmic coordinate was raised, and the difference of failure effect probability between single and non-single point of failure was elucidated. Secondly, the difference and connection between criticality metric and criticality was stated, quantitative calculation formula of failure mode criticality was derived.Finally, criticality matrix analysis is carried out taking an elevator sub-system, and the results show that the improved criticality matrix method is reasonable and has high efficiency and accuracy.
引文
[1]中国人民解放军总装备部.故障模式、影响及危害性分析指南:GJB/Z 1391-2006[S].北京:总装备部军标出版发行部,2006.PLA GENERAL ARMAMENT DEPARTMENT.Failure mode,effects and criticality analysis guide:GJB/Z 1391-2006[S].Beijing:The General Armament Department of Military Standard Publishing Department,2006.(in Chinese)
    [2]曾声奎.可靠性设计与分析[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2015:214-219.ZENG SHENGKUI.Reliability design and analysis[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2015:214-219.(in Chinese)
    [3]陈颖,康锐.FMECA技术及其应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2014:43-60.CHEN YING,KANG RUI.FMECA methodology and applications[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2014:43-60.(in Chinese)
    [4]崔文彬,吴桂涛,孙培廷,等.基于FMEA和模糊综合评判的船舶安全评估[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2007,28(3):264-267,276.CUI WENBIN,WU GUITAO,SUN PEITING,et al.Ship safety assessment based on FMEA and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods[J].Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2007,28(3):264-267,276.(in Chinese)
    [5]周真,马德仲,于晓洋,等.用于产品可靠性分析的模糊FMECA方法[J].电机与控制学报,2010,14(10):89-93,99.ZHOU ZHEN,MA DEZHONG,YU XIAOYANG,et al.Application of fuzzy FMECA in analysis of product reliability[J].Electric Machines and Control,2010,14(10):89-93,99.(in Chinese)
    [6]翟胜,师五喜,修春波.基于模糊贝叶斯网的危害性分析方法[J].计算机应用,2014,34(12):3446-3450,3480.ZHAI SHENG,SHI WUXI,XIU CHUNBO.Criticality analysis method based on fuzzy Bayesian networks[J].Journal of Computer Applications,2014,34(12):3446-3450,3480.(in Chinese)
    [7]林国斌,郭育华,王施宇.模糊危害度评价方法在磁浮列车电路板FMECA分析中的应用[J].现代电子技术,2017,40(16):1-4,9.LIN GUOBIN,GUO YUHUA,WANG SHIYU.Application of fuzzy criticality evaluation method in failure mode effects and criticality analysis for circuit board in maglev train[J].Modern Electronics Technique,2017,40(16):1-4,9.(in Chinese)
    [8]龚庆祥.型号可靠性工程手册[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007:126-130.GONG QINGXIANG.Model reliability engineering manual[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2007:126-130.(in Chinese)
    [9]邓海飞,吕艳梅,王家林,等.某型无人机伞降回收系统故障模式、影响及危害性分析[J].装备环境工程,2012,9(3):90-93,98.DENG HAIFEI,LYU YANMEI,WANG JIALIN,et al.FMECA for parachuted recovery system of a type UAV[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2012,9(3):90-93,98.(in Chinese)
    [10]苏艳红,赵永翔,门正兴,等.基于FMECA方法的冲压模具故障模式及危害性分析[J].成都航空职业技术学院学报,2018(2):50-52.SU YANHONG,ZHAO YONGXIANG,MEN ZHENGX-ING,et al.The fault mode and its hazard analysis of stamping die based on FMECA[J].Journal of Chengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic,2018(2):50-52.(in Chinese)
    [11]王锦妮,火建卫.定量危害性矩阵分析方法研究[J].航空工程进展,2016,7(1):70-77.WANG JINNI,HUO JIANWEI.Research on quantitative criticality matrix analysis method[J].Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering,2016,7(1):70-77.(in Chinese)
    [12]王家林,陈卫.某型无人机飞控系统FMECA分析[J].舰船电子工程,2013,33(4):49-51,58.WANG JIALIN,CHEN WEI.A UAV flight-control system failure mode,effect and criticality analysis[J].Ship Electronic Engineering,2013,33(4):49-51,58.(in Chinese)
    [13]LI JUN,XU HUIBIN.Reliability analysis of aircraft equipment based on FMECA[J].Physics Procedia,2012,25:1816-1822.
    [14]张瑗,陈宏韬,赵嵩,等.航天用无刷直流电动机故障模式及危害性分析[J].微特电机,2015,43(2):27-30.ZHANG YUAN,CHEN HONGTAO,ZHAO SONG,et al.Failure mode and criticality analysis of aerospace brushless DC motor[J].Small&Special Electrical Machines,2015,43(2):27-30.(in Chinese)
    [15]张锐丽,高万春,吴为团.基于FMECA方法的故障模式危害性分析[J].中国设备工程,2017(6):53-54.ZHANG RUILI,GAO WANCHUN,WU WEITUAN.Failure mode criticality analysis based on FMECA[J].China Plant Engineering,2017(6):53-54.(in Chinese)
    [16]Department of defense standard practice for system safety:ESOH risk management methodology for systems engineering:MIL-STD-882E-2012[S].Ohio:Department of Defense.2012.
    [17]国防科学技术工业委员会.装备研制风险分析要求:GJB 5852-2006[S].北京:国防科工委军标出版发行部,2006.DEFENSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRYCOMMITTEE.Risk analysis requirements for materiel development:GJB 5852-2006[S].Beijing:Publishing Departmen of COSTINI,2006.(in Chinese)
    [18]杨海峰,赵新攀,苟仲秋.基于关键事件的系统级单点故障识别方法及应用[J].航天器环境工程,2014(3):306-310.YANG HAIFENG,ZHAO XINPAN,GOU ZHONGQIU.The system level single point failure identification based on critical incident[J].Spacecraft Environment Engineering,2014(3):306-310.(in Chinese)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700