基于土地整治的山地丘陵区耕地质量潜力测算
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A Method for Estimating Quality-Improvement Potential of Cultivated Land in Land Consolidation Projects in Hilly Areas
  • 作者:王婕 ; 魏朝富 ; 刘卫平 ; 钟守琴 ; 信桂新
  • 英文作者:WANG Jie;WEI Chao-fu;LIU Wei-ping;ZHONG Shou-qin;XIN Gui-xin;School of Resources and Environment,Southwest University;Research Center for Development and Utility of Unique Resources in the Wulingshan Region, Yangtze Normal University;
  • 关键词:山地丘陵 ; 土地整治 ; 耕地质量 ; 潜力测算
  • 英文关键词:hilly area;;land consolidation;;cultivated land quality;;potential estimation
  • 中文刊名:XNND
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
  • 机构:西南大学资源环境学院;长江师范学院武陵山区特色资源开发与利用研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-07-20
  • 出版单位:西南大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.40;No.283
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划课题(2013BAJ11B02)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XNND201807019
  • 页数:11
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:50-1189/N
  • 分类号:128-138
摘要
准确地识别土地整治改良因素和科学地测算耕地质量潜力对耕地质量建设具有重要意义.本研究基于我国现有的耕地质量评价体系,分析土地整治工程措施对山地丘陵区耕地质量的影响,提出了一套服务于山地丘陵区土地整治的耕地质量提升潜力测算方法;并通过准确识别土地整治改良因素,确定提升方案,测算了重庆市綦江区耕地质量提升潜力.结果显示:1)研究区现状国家利用等指数区间为648.02~1 659.33,整治后国家利用等指数区间为761.81~1 783.04,耕地质量平均可提高0.79个利用等;2)得到的现状耕地利用等指数与折算为基准作物的实际产量的相关性(R~2=0.895 0)大于农用地分等成果(R~2=0.797 4);3)高潜力分等单元主要分布在地势较为平坦、水源较为充足的丘陵地带,整治重点是提高农民生产生活条件;低潜力分等单元主要分布在陡坡中山地带和有石灰岩分布的喀斯特丘陵区,整治重点为防止水土流失与保护生态环境.本研究提供的潜力测算方法适应了差别化土地整治需求,保证了测算结果的真实性和潜力实现的可行性,可为山地丘陵区土地整治耕地质量潜力测算提供参考.不同的地质地貌类,耕地质量提升的核心因子有所差异,土地整治的工程措施应有侧重点.
        Accurate identification of improvement factors for cultivated land and scientific estimation of the potential of cultivated land quality in land consolidation projects are of great significance for cultivated land quality construction.In a study reported in this paper,the effect of engineering measures of land consolidation in hilly areas on cultivated land quality was analyzed based on the existing evaluation system of cultivated land quality in China,and a calculating method of improved cultivated land quality was put forward.In addition,this study determined the scheme for improving cultivated land quality and calculated the quality improvement potential of cultivated land in Qijiang district of Chongqing by accurately identifying the improvement factors of land consolidation.The results showed that the index interval of national utilization was between 648.02 and 1 659.33 before land consolidation and between 761.81 and 1 783.04 after land consolidation and that the quality of cultivated land was improved by 0.79 on average.The correlation between the cultivated land use index and actual yield of the converted base crops(R~2=0.895 0)was greater than that among agricultural land classification(R~2=0.797 4).High potential units were mainly distributed in hilly areas with a low-relief surface and abundant water sources.And the focus of land consolidation in high potential units was to improve the living and production conditions of the peasants.Low potential units were mainly distributed in mountainous areas with a steep slope and in the karst landform areas with limestone soil.In these areas,the focus of land consolidation should be placed on soil erosion prevention and ecological environment protection.In conclusion,the calculation method proposed in this study is adaptable to the demand of differentiated land consolidation and guaranteed the authenticity of results and feasibility of the quality improvement potential.This study provides a reference for the calculation of cultivated land potential quality in hilly areas.With different landform types,the core factors of quality improvement of cultivated land are different and,hence,engineering measures of land consolidation should be selected according to the specific conditions.
引文
[1]严金明,夏方舟,马梅.中国土地整治转发展战略导向研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(2):3-10.
    [2]刘巧芹,李子君,吴克宁,等.中国耕地整理潜力测算方法研究综述[J].资源开发与市场,2013,29(2):127-130,148.
    [3]陈朝,吕昌河,邓南荣,等.华北平原县域耕地质量综合评价[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(10):110-116.
    [4]SKLENICKA P.Applying Evaluation Criteria for the Land Consolidation Effect to Three Contrasting Study Areas in the Czech Republic[J].Land Use Policy,2006,23(4):502-510.
    [5]CAY T,ISCAN F.Fuzzy Expert System for Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(9):11055-11071.
    [6]SHUAI Y,WEI C F,YANG X Y,et al.The Ecological Compensation of Land Consolidation and Its Evaluation in Hilly Area of Southwest China[J].Energy Procedia,2011,5(22):1192-1199.
    [7]伍育鹏,郧文聚,邹如.耕地产能核算模的研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(S2):108-113.
    [8]唐秀美,陈百明,张蕾娜,等.新形势下全国农用地整理潜力测算方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(9):67-71.
    [9]王洪丹,王金满,李新凤.北方山丘区县域农用地整理数量质量潜力测算方法研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(3):373-378.
    [10]余建新,魏巍,廖晓虹,等.土地整治项目区农用地质量分等方法的修正[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):234-240.
    [11]徐康,金晓斌,吴定国,等.基于农用地分等修正的土地整治项目耕地质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):247-255.
    [12]匡丽花,叶英聪,赵小敏,等.基于农用地分等修正的土地整治项目对耕地质量的影响评价[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(17):198-205.
    [13]高星.耕地质量等级提升的土地整治项目设计关键技术研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
    [14]张瑞娟,姜广辉,周丁扬,等.耕地整治质量潜力测算方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(14):238-244.
    [15]陈青锋,于化龙,张杰,等.耕地质量提升重点区域划定及可提升潜力研究——以河北省卢龙县为例[J].农业现代化研究,2016,37(2):221-229.
    [16]王军,钟莉娜.中国土地整治文献分析与研究进展[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(4):88-96.
    [17]高星,吴克宁,陈学砧,等.土地整治项目提升耕地质量可实现潜力测算[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(16):233-240.
    [18]邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
    [19]郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5):148-153.
    [20]沈仁芳,陈美军,孔祥斌,等.耕地质量的概念和评价与管理对策[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1210-1217.
    [21]张慧,李新旺,霍习良,等.基于产能理论的耕地整理现实潜力测算方法研究——以河北省肃宁县为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):202-206,212.
    [22]赵蕾,谭荣建.基于农用地分等的土地整理耕地质量评定方法[J].科学技术与工程,2012,12(17):4266-4270.
    [23]张正峰,陈百明.土地整理潜力分析[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(6):664-669.
    [24]刘巧芹,李子君,吴克宁,等.中国耕地整理潜力测算方法研究综述[J].资源开发与市场,2013,29(2):127-130,148.
    [25]刘巧芹,郭爱请,吴克宁,等.中国土地整理分区研究进展与展望[J].资源开发与市场,2013,29(1):72-75,93.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700