福州城市公园绿地可达性影响因素
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Factors affecting accessibility of urban park green space in Fuzhou
  • 作者:上官莎逸 ; 刘健 ; 余坤勇 ; 赖壮杰 ; 范华栋 ; 赵秋月 ; 艾婧文 ; 张今朝
  • 英文作者:SHANGGUAN Shayi;LIU Jian;YU Kunyong;LAI Zhuangjie;FAN Huadong;ZHAO Qiuyue;AI Jingwen;ZHANG Jinzhao;College of Landscape Architecture,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University;University Key Laboratory for 3S Technology and Optimized Resources Utilization in Fujiau Province;College of Forestry,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University;
  • 关键词:城市公园绿地 ; 可达性 ; 公园绿地服务模型 ; 网络分析法
  • 英文关键词:urban park green space;;accessibility;;park green space service model;;network analysis method
  • 中文刊名:FJND
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Natural Science Edition)
  • 机构:福建农林大学园林学院;3S技术与资源优化利用福建省高校重点实验室;福建农林大学林学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-07-18
  • 出版单位:福建农林大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.47
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41401385);; 福建省科技计划项目(2016N003)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:FJND201804018
  • 页数:9
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:35-1255/S
  • 分类号:112-120
摘要
基于GIS的网络分析法,以福州市为例,选取公园绿地面积、人口密度、路网密度及形状指数四个因子进行可达性评价,分析各因子与公园绿地可达性的相关性及变化规律,构建公园绿地服务模型.结果表明:城市公园绿地的服务面积比为33.74%,服务人口比为43.18%,整体服务情况较好.4个因子对公园绿地可达性的影响程度存在差异,其中公园绿地面积与其服务面积呈正相关,与其服务效率呈显著负相关;人口密度与其服务面积呈显著负相关,与其服务效率呈弱相关;路网密度与其服务面积及服务效率均呈弱相关;形状指数与其服务面积呈正相关,与其服务效率呈弱相关.各因子相关性大小依次为,城市公园绿地服务面积模型:形状指数>人口密度>公园绿地面积>路网密度;城市公园绿地服务效率模型:公园绿地面积>路网密度>形状指数>人口密度.
        Based on the network analysis method of GIS,this paper takes Fuzhou as an example to evaluate the accessibility of green area,population density,road network density and shape index,and analyzes the correlation and change rules of the accessibility of each factor and park green space,and constructs a park green space service model. The results show that the service area of urban green space is 33.74%,the ratio of service to population is 43.18%,and the overall service is better. The influence of 4 factors on accessibility of park green space is different. The service area is positively correlated,and negatively related to the service efficiency.Population density is negatively correlated with service area and weakly related to service efficiency. There is a weak correlation between road network density and service area and service efficiency. The shape index is positively correlated with the service area and weakly related to the service efficiency. The correlation among the factors is as follows: for urban park green space service area model,shape index > population density > park green space area > road network density; for urban park green space service efficiencymodel,park green area > road network density > shape index > population density.
引文
[1]苏宝玲,佟耕,范业展,等.沈阳城市绿地系统的景观生态评价[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(8):1 599-1 604.
    [2]高骆秋.基于空间可达性的山地城市公园绿地布局探讨[D].重庆:西南大学,2010.
    [3]章茜茜.城市公园绿地系统规划研究[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2010.
    [4]CHAN C S,MARAFA L M.Changing perspectives in urban park management:a longitudinal study of Hong Kong[J].Managing Sport&Leisure,2015,20(1):56-76.
    [5]于苏建.福州市主城区公园绿地的综合评价研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2011.
    [6]SHEN S G,WANG H,FEI W J,et al.Urban park green space system planning based on accessibility method——A case of Luancheng City in China[J].Applied Mechanics&Materials,2012,209-211:331-336.
    [7]ZHOU X,KIM J.Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility:A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remotesensing[J].Urban Forestry&Urban Greening,2013,12(1):88-97.
    [8]NICHOLLS S.Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks:a case study using GIS.[J].Managing Leisure,2001,6(4):201-219.
    [9]方可,哈思杰,唐梅,等.城市绿地建设实施评估方法创新研究——以武汉市为例[J].城市规划学刊,2015(6):84-89.
    [10]尹海伟,孔繁花,宗跃光.城市绿地可达性与公平性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3 375-3 383.
    [11]李韵平,杜红玉.城市公园的源起、发展及对当代中国的启示[J].国际城市规划,2017(5):39-43.
    [12]高燕斌.福州城市规划中存在的问题与对策分析[J].财经问题研究,2015(S1):104-108.
    [13]罗栋燊.福州生态城市建设的现状评价与对策研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2008.
    [14]白丽月.近二十年福州城市建设用地扩展研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2010.
    [15]FUGLSANG M,HANSEN H S,MUNIER B.Accessibility Analysis and Modelling in Public Transport Networks——A Raster Based Approach[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2011:207-224.
    [16]阚吉.基于GIS的空间可达性评价方法研究[D].南京:东南大学,2015.
    [17]GHANBARI A,GHANBARI M.Assessing spatial distribution of tabriz parks by gis(compared network analysis and buffering)[J].Geography&Environmental Planning,2013,50(2):1-13.
    [18]TSOU K W,HUNG Y T,CHANG Y L.An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities[J].Cities,2005,22(6):424-435.
    [19]余双燕,钟业喜.基于GIS的城市公园可达性分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(28):15 842-15 844.
    [20]HERZELE A V,WIEDEMANN T.A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces[J].Landscape&Urban Planning,2003,63(2):109-126.
    [21]孙振如,尹海伟,孔繁花.不同计算方法下的公园可达性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(S1):162-165.
    [22]KONG F H,YIN H W,NAKAGOSHI N.Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space:a case study in Jinan City,China.[J].Landscape&Urban Planning,2007,79(3):240-252.
    [23]OH K,JEONG S.Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS[J].Landscape&Urban Planning,2007,82(1-2):25-32.
    [24]朱莹.城市公园可达性研究[D].南京:南京大学,2013.
    [25]刘常富,李小马,韩东.城市公园可达性研究——方法与关键问题[J].生态学报,2010,30(19):5 381-5 390.
    [26]CLERCQ E M D,WULF R D,HERZELE A V.Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility[J].Landscape&Urban Planning,2007,80(1):14-22.
    [27]施拓.基于缓冲区分析法和网络分析法的城市公园可达性对比研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.
    [28]黄翌,胡召玲,王健,等.基于GIS的徐州主城区公共绿地可达性研究[J].江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,27(3):72-75.
    [29]尹红岩,李俊英,施拓,等.公园绿地可达性的客观影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(10):3 387-3 393.
    [30]邹晖,祁毅,徐建刚.基于形态差异的城市绿地公园服务效率评价——ARCGIS可达性分析应用实例[J].南昌师范学院学报,2013,34(3):35-38.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700