基于条件价值法的生态补偿效果影响因素研究
|
摘要
以条件价值法为基础,建立生态系统服务交易的供给与需求模型,通过分析不同条件下均衡点的变化,探讨影响生态补偿效果的影响因素,为生态补偿政策制定者提供参考意见。研究表明,社会贫富差距和"上游贫穷、下游富有"的区域贫富差距与生态补偿效果呈正相关关系;补偿方对生态系统服务的基础偏好、补偿方对生态补偿效果期望值、受偿方替代工作的收入与生态补偿效果呈正相关关系;交易费用与生态补偿效果呈负相关关系。为此,建议政府通过选择贫富差距大的区域进行生态补偿、加强宣传、给受偿方创造替代工作、给予生态补偿政策支持等提高生态补偿效果。
Based on the conditional value method,a supply and demand model for ecosystem service transactions was established.By analyzing the changes of equilibrium points under different conditions,the factors which influence the effect of ecological compensation were explored,and then provided reference opinions for eco-compensation policy makers.Studies have shown that social income gap and "regional income gap"were positively correlated with the effect of ecological compensation;the basic preference of the compensatory party for ecosystem services,the expected value of the compensation party's effect on ecological compensation,and the income from replacement work of the recipient has a positive correlation with the effect of ecological compensation;transaction costs had a negative correlation with the effect of ecological compensation.Therefore,it was recommended that the government should improve ecological compensation by choosing ecological compensation areas where had a large income gap,strengthening publicity,creating alternative jobs for the recipient,and providing support for ecological compensation policies.
Based on the conditional value method,a supply and demand model for ecosystem service transactions was established.By analyzing the changes of equilibrium points under different conditions,the factors which influence the effect of ecological compensation were explored,and then provided reference opinions for eco-compensation policy makers.Studies have shown that social income gap and "regional income gap"were positively correlated with the effect of ecological compensation;the basic preference of the compensatory party for ecosystem services,the expected value of the compensation party's effect on ecological compensation,and the income from replacement work of the recipient has a positive correlation with the effect of ecological compensation;transaction costs had a negative correlation with the effect of ecological compensation.Therefore,it was recommended that the government should improve ecological compensation by choosing ecological compensation areas where had a large income gap,strengthening publicity,creating alternative jobs for the recipient,and providing support for ecological compensation policies.
引文
[1]谢玲,李爱年.责任分配抑或权利确认:流域生态补偿适用条件之辨析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(10):109-115.
[2]陈晓红,胡维,王陟昀.自愿减排碳交易市场价格影响因素实证研究——以美国芝加哥气候交易所(CCX)为例[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(4):74-81.
[3]汪运波,肖建红.基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(8):149-155.
[4]CHAN K M A,ANDERSON E,CHAMPMAN M,et al.Payments for ecosystem services:rife with problems and potentialfor transformation towards sustainability[J].Ecological Economics,2017,140:110-122.
[5]LIMA L S D,KRUEGER T,GARCA MARQUEZ J.Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,27(A):139-149.
[6]SILVERTOWN J.Have ecosystem services been oversold?[J].Trends in Ecology&Evolution,2015,30(11):641-648.
[7]单薇,方茂中.基于主成分构建生态补偿效益评价模型[J].河南科学,2009,27(11):1441-1444.
[8]岳思羽.汉江流域生态补偿效益的评价研究[J].环境科学导刊,2012,31(2):42-45.
[9]谭映宇,刘瑜,马恒,等.浙江省生态补偿的实践与效益评价研究[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(5):156-159.
[10]李国平,李潇,汪海洲.国家重点生态功能区转移支付的生态补偿效果分析[J].当代经济科学,2013,35(5):58-64.
[11]郭玮,李炜.基于多元统计分析的生态补偿转移支付效果评价[J].经济问题,2014(11):92-97.
[12]赵春光.流域生态补偿制度的理论基础[J].法学论坛,2008,23(4):90-96.
[13]SHENG J,WEBBER M.Incentive-compatible payments for watershed services along the Eastern route of China’s SouthNorth Water Transfer Project[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,25:213-226.
[14]LU Y,HE T.Assessing the effects of regional payment for watershed services program on water quality using an intervention analysis model[J].Science of the Total Environment,2014,493:1056-1064.
[15]ROUMASSET J,WADA C A.A dynamic approach to PES pricing and finance for interlinked ecosystem services:watershed conservation and groundwater management[J].Working Papers,2013,87(2):24-33.
[16]HURWICZ L.What is the coase theorem?[J].Japan&the World Economy,2004,7(1):49-74.
[17]ALIX GARCIA J,JANVRY A D,SADOULET E.The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services[J].Environment and Development Economics,2008,13(3):375-394.
[18]赵翠薇,王世杰.生态补偿效益、标准:国际经验及对我国的启示[J].地理研究,2010,29(4):597-605.
[19]丁华.江苏省农村收入分配的对数正态模型研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1993(2):55-60.
[20]赵锦春,谢建国.需求结构重叠与中国的进口贸易——基于收入分配相似的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2014(1):27-42.
[21]WANG P,POE G,WOLF S.Payments for ecosystem services and wealth distribution[J].Ecological Economics,2017,132:63-68.
[22]RODRIGUEZ J G,SALAS R.The Gini coefficient:majority voting and social welfare[J].Journal of Economic Theory,2014,152:214-223.
[23]肖加元,潘安.基于水排污权交易的流域生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):18-26.
[2]陈晓红,胡维,王陟昀.自愿减排碳交易市场价格影响因素实证研究——以美国芝加哥气候交易所(CCX)为例[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(4):74-81.
[3]汪运波,肖建红.基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(8):149-155.
[4]CHAN K M A,ANDERSON E,CHAMPMAN M,et al.Payments for ecosystem services:rife with problems and potentialfor transformation towards sustainability[J].Ecological Economics,2017,140:110-122.
[5]LIMA L S D,KRUEGER T,GARCA MARQUEZ J.Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,27(A):139-149.
[6]SILVERTOWN J.Have ecosystem services been oversold?[J].Trends in Ecology&Evolution,2015,30(11):641-648.
[7]单薇,方茂中.基于主成分构建生态补偿效益评价模型[J].河南科学,2009,27(11):1441-1444.
[8]岳思羽.汉江流域生态补偿效益的评价研究[J].环境科学导刊,2012,31(2):42-45.
[9]谭映宇,刘瑜,马恒,等.浙江省生态补偿的实践与效益评价研究[J].环境科学与管理,2012,37(5):156-159.
[10]李国平,李潇,汪海洲.国家重点生态功能区转移支付的生态补偿效果分析[J].当代经济科学,2013,35(5):58-64.
[11]郭玮,李炜.基于多元统计分析的生态补偿转移支付效果评价[J].经济问题,2014(11):92-97.
[12]赵春光.流域生态补偿制度的理论基础[J].法学论坛,2008,23(4):90-96.
[13]SHENG J,WEBBER M.Incentive-compatible payments for watershed services along the Eastern route of China’s SouthNorth Water Transfer Project[J].Ecosystem Services,2017,25:213-226.
[14]LU Y,HE T.Assessing the effects of regional payment for watershed services program on water quality using an intervention analysis model[J].Science of the Total Environment,2014,493:1056-1064.
[15]ROUMASSET J,WADA C A.A dynamic approach to PES pricing and finance for interlinked ecosystem services:watershed conservation and groundwater management[J].Working Papers,2013,87(2):24-33.
[16]HURWICZ L.What is the coase theorem?[J].Japan&the World Economy,2004,7(1):49-74.
[17]ALIX GARCIA J,JANVRY A D,SADOULET E.The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services[J].Environment and Development Economics,2008,13(3):375-394.
[18]赵翠薇,王世杰.生态补偿效益、标准:国际经验及对我国的启示[J].地理研究,2010,29(4):597-605.
[19]丁华.江苏省农村收入分配的对数正态模型研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1993(2):55-60.
[20]赵锦春,谢建国.需求结构重叠与中国的进口贸易——基于收入分配相似的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2014(1):27-42.
[21]WANG P,POE G,WOLF S.Payments for ecosystem services and wealth distribution[J].Ecological Economics,2017,132:63-68.
[22]RODRIGUEZ J G,SALAS R.The Gini coefficient:majority voting and social welfare[J].Journal of Economic Theory,2014,152:214-223.
[23]肖加元,潘安.基于水排污权交易的流域生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):18-26.