长汀县崩岗区8种禾本科植物根系构型特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Root architecture of eight Gramineae plant species in the Benggang area of Changting County
  • 作者:李思诗 ; 司晓静 ; 蒋芳市 ; 林金石 ; 蔡学智 ; 吴俣 ; 黄炎和
  • 英文作者:LI Si-shi;SI Xiao-jing;JIANG Fang-shi;LIN Jin-shi;CAI Xue-zhi;WU Yu;HUANG Yan-he;College of Forestry,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University;College of Resources and Environment,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University;
  • 关键词:崩岗区 ; 禾本科 ; 草本植物 ; 根系构型 ; 主成分分析
  • 英文关键词:Benggang;;Gramineae;;herb plant;;root architecture;;principal component analysis
  • 中文刊名:CYXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Prataculturae Sinica
  • 机构:福建农林大学林学院;福建农林大学资源与环境学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-10-20
  • 出版单位:草业学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.27;No.159
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD15B0303);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41571272);; 福建省自然科学基金项目(2015J01156)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYXB201810027
  • 页数:8
  • CN:10
  • ISSN:62-1105/S
  • 分类号:217-224
摘要
为探究崩岗区草本植物根系构型特征,以8种禾本科植物:白茅、金茅、五节芒、鹧鸪草、狗牙根、宽叶雀稗、巨菌草和香根草为研究对象,运用主成分分析法对其6个根系构型参数进行分析和综合评分。结果表明:试验草本根系平均直径为0.36~0.63mm;金茅、五节芒、鹧鸪草、宽叶雀稗和香根草总根长无显著差异;总根表面积、总根体积、根尖数和交叉数均不同,巨菌草的总根表面积最大,白茅的最小,巨菌草的根尖数和交叉数均最大。根系构型的主要影响因子是平均直径、总根表面积和总根体积。8种植物根系综合得分依次为:巨菌草>宽叶雀稗>金茅>五节芒>香根草>鹧鸪草>狗牙根>白茅。研究成果可为崩岗治理中草本植物的筛选、配置和推广提供科学依据。
        In order to explore the root architecture of herbaceous plants in the Benggang area,eight Gramineae species were studied(Imperata cylindrica,Eulalia speciosa,Miscanthus floridulus,Eriachne pallescens,Cynodon dactylon,Paspalum wettsteinii,Pennisetum sp.and Vetiveria zizanioides).Six root architecture parameters were analyzed and comprehensively evaluated using principal component analysis.The results showed that the average diameter of the tested herbaceous roots was between 0.36 and 0.63 mm.There were no significant differences in the total root length of E.speciosa,M.floridulus,E.pallescens,P.wettsteinii and V.zizanioides.The total root surface area,total root volume,root tip numbers and crossing numbers varied by plant species.The total root surface area of Pennisetumsp.was the largest and that of I.cylindricathe smallest.The root tips and crossing numbers of Pennisetumsp.were also the largest.Average diameter,total root surface area and total root volume were the main factors influencing root architecture.The composite score order of the eight species' roots was Pennisetumsp.>P.wettsteinii>E.speciosa>M.floridulus>V.zizanioides>E.pallescens>C.dactylon>I.cylindrica.These results help to provide a scientific basis for the screening,allocating and popularizing of herbaceous plants for the control of erosion.
引文
[1] Liang Y,Ning D H,Pan X Z,et al.Characteristic and management of dilapidated granite erosion of red soil region in south.Soil and Water Conservation in China,2009,30(1):31-34.梁音,宁堆虎,潘贤章,等.南方红壤区崩岗侵蚀的特点与治理.中国水土保持,2009,30(1):31-34.
    [2] Jiang F S,Huang Y H,Wang M K,et al.Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on steep colluvial deposit erosion in Southeast China.Soil Science Society of America Journal,2014,78(5):1741-1752.
    [3] Lin J S,Huang Y H,Wang M K,et al.Assessing the sources of sediment transported in gully systems using a fingerprinting approach:An example from South-east China.Catena,2015,129(2):9-17.
    [4] Chen Z M,Xu Y M,Li C L.Mode of management for dilapidated granite and effect of implementation of Anxi County.Soil and Water Conservation in China,2007,(3):15-17.陈志明,许永明,李翠玲.安溪县崩岗治理模式及实施效果.中国水土保持,2007,(3):15-17.
    [5] Yue H,Zeng H S,Chen Z B.Research on bio-governing of collapsing hill in the erosion area of Hetian township.Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation,2005,17(1):13-14,28.岳辉,曾河水,陈志彪.河田侵蚀区崩岗的生物治理研究.亚热带水土保持,2005,17(1):13-14,28.
    [6] Pregitzer K S,Deforest J L,Burton A J,et al.Fine root architecture of nine north American trees.Ecological Monographs,2002,72(2):293-309.
    [7] Mao Q Z,Yang X T,Miao L.The ecological roles and influencing factors of plant root architecture.Henan Science,2008,26(2):172-176.毛齐正,杨喜田,苗蕾.植物根系构型的生态功能及其影响因素.河南科学,2008,26(2):172-176.
    [8] Zhang T.Advances in the latest research methods of ecological root architecture.Resources Economization and Environmental Protection,2016,(4):172-173.张通.生态根系构型最新研究方法进展.资源节约与环保,2016,(4):172-173.
    [9] Zhou Y S,Wang L Q,Zhang P,et al.Responses of the root architecture of Stipagrandis to grassland degradation.Pratacultural Science,2011,28(11):1962-1966.周艳松,王立群,张鹏,等.大针茅根系构型对草地退化的响应.草业科学,2011,28(11):1962-1966.
    [10] Du J H,Liu A L,Dong Y X,et al.Architectural characteristics of roots in typical coastal psammophytes of South China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2014,38(8):888-895.杜建会,刘安隆,董玉祥,等.华南海岸典型沙生植物根系构型特征.植物生态学报,2014,38(8):888-895.
    [11] Shan L S,Li Y,Ren W,et al.Root architecture of two desert plants in central Hexi Corridor of Northwest China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(1):25-31.单立山,李毅,任伟,等.河西走廊中部两种荒漠植物根系构型特征.应用生态学报,2013,24(1):25-31.
    [12] Wang X F,Wang Z Y,Liang J H,et al.Study on the root architecture of cespitose plants in the grassland of Inner Mongolia.Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2013,34(3):77-82.王旭峰,王占义,梁金华,等.内蒙古草地丛生型植物根系构型的研究.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(3):77-82.
    [13] Yao S G,Taketa S,Ichii M.A novel short-root gene that affects specifically early root development in rice(Oryza sativa L.).Plant Science,2002,163(2):207-215.
    [14] Cui H,Li L Y,Xie X L,et al.Differences in root architecture of several Stylosanthes genotypes and their phosphorus efficiency.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2013,22(5):265-271.崔航,李立颖,谢小林,等.不同基因型柱花草的根系构型差异及其磷效率.草业学报,2013,22(5):265-271.
    [15] Chen Z B,Zhu H J,Liu Q,et al.Slump gully characteristic of small watershed of Genxi River and its control measures.Journal of Natural Disasters,2006,15(5):83-88.陈志彪,朱鹤健,刘强,等.根溪河小流域的崩岗特征及其治理措施.自然灾害学报,2006,15(5):83-88.
    [16] He K W,Huang Y H,Jiang F S,et al.Effects of two types of herb plants’roots on soil moisture in the alluvial soil in Changting County.Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,15(4):25-34.何恺文,黄炎和,蒋芳市,等.2种草本植物根系对长汀县崩岗洪积扇土壤水分状况的影响.中国水土保持科学,2017,15(4):25-34.
    [17] Liang J H,Wang L Q,Qi Z X,et al.Study on the root architecture of common axis-rooted type plants in the grassland of Inner Mongolia.Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2012,33(3):62-66.梁金华,王立群,齐智鑫,等.内蒙古草地常见轴根型植物根系构型参数的研究.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(3):62-66.
    [18] Bohm W.Methods of studying root systems.Beijing:Science Press,1985:153-156.伯姆W.根系研究法.北京:科学出版社,1985:153-156.
    [19] Xiong Y M,Xia H P,Li Z A,et al.Effects and mechanisms of plant roots on slope reinforcement and soil erosion resistance:A research review.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(4):895-904.熊燕梅,夏汉平,李志安,等.植物根系固坡抗蚀的效应与机理研究进展.应用生态学报,2007,18(4):895-904.
    [20] Chen S K.Statistical analysis of SPSS from beginner to mastery(3Edition).Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2015:344-359.陈胜可.SPSS统计分析从入门到精通(第三版).北京:清华大学出版社,2015:344-359.
    [21] Ge R L,Liu Y Q,Zuo Z Y,et al.Principal component analysis about the main mechanical factors of soil-reinforcement by roots.Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2015,36(6):39-47.格日乐,刘艳琦,左志严,等.根系固土主要力学因子的主成分分析.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,36(6):39-47.
    [22] Zhang G F,Jiang X H,Cui Y B.The research and application progress of Vetiveria zizanioioles.Pratacultural Science,2005,22(1):73-78.张国发,姜旭红,崔玉波.香根草研究与应用进展.草业科学,2005,22(1):73-78.
    [23] Xia H P,Liu S Z.Study on screening for excellent ecotypes of Vetiveria zizanioides.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2003,12(2):97-105.夏汉平,刘世忠.香根草优良生态型筛选研究.草业学报,2003,12(2):97-105.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700