试论媒介融合背景下网络作品传播者的权利保护
|
摘要
技术发展带来作品传播手段的不断变革,我国著作权法列举式的保护方式已不能满足媒介融合背景下网络作品传播者权利保护的最大化需求。通过对网络作品传播者权利保护现状分析,指出主要存在门户网站权益遭受侵害严重、数据库拥有者合法权利保护不足、社会化创作者权利请求不受重视等问题,并从维权与授权相结合、建立多元保护机制、引入弹性授权方式三方面提出相应对策,以期完善媒介融合环境下网络作品传播者的权利保护。
Coming along with the reform of dissemination means, copyright law, a document of enumeration, cannot meet the maximize needs of network disseminators. Three problems, including frequent lawful rights infringed of portal sites, the insufficient protection of database owners and the claims of social creators were not valued, were pointed out on the basis of analyzing protection status of network disseminators, and solutions to the problems will focus in a combination of rights protection and authorization, establishing multiple protection mechanism and introducing elastic authorization approaches.
Coming along with the reform of dissemination means, copyright law, a document of enumeration, cannot meet the maximize needs of network disseminators. Three problems, including frequent lawful rights infringed of portal sites, the insufficient protection of database owners and the claims of social creators were not valued, were pointed out on the basis of analyzing protection status of network disseminators, and solutions to the problems will focus in a combination of rights protection and authorization, establishing multiple protection mechanism and introducing elastic authorization approaches.
引文
[1]人民网.最高法院发布2015中国法院知识产权司法保护白皮书[EB/OL].(2016-04-21)[2017-02-01].http://legal.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0421/c42510-28294734.html.
[2]姚洪军.从著作权与邻接权的关系谈网络服务提供者权[J].山东行政学院学报,2013(12):121-125.
[3]上官凯云.信息网络传播者邻接权保护的构想——以网络深层链接中被链网站利益为视角[J].传播与版权,2016(1):181-183.
[4]上海汉涛信息咨询有限公司诉爱帮聚信(北京)科技有限公司、爱帮聚信(北京)信息技术有限公司不正当竞争纠纷一案[EB/OL].[2017-02-21].http://www.110.com/panli/panli_25570151.html.
[5]侯长海.速途研究院:2015年移动新闻客户端市场报告[EB/OL].(2016-02-05)[2017-02-21].http://www.sootoo.com/content/660903.shtml.
[6]关于数据库法律保护的指令[EB/OL].(2011-02-01)[2017-02-21].http://www.docin.com/p-121916140.html.
[7]龚琳.自制视频作品的著作权冲突与利益平衡路径[J].三明学院学报,2016(1):44-49.
[8]李杨.欧盟数据库特殊权利保护制度的缺陷及其立法完善[J].法商研究,2003(4):26-35.
[9]洪学军.不当得利制度研究[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2003.
[10]柯实.今日头条:一个估值5亿美元的APP[J].创业家,2014(6):33-35.
[11]曾梦倩.网络环境下默示许可制度研究[D].北京:中国政法大学,2015.
[12]王雅,陈静华,贾菁菁.试论CC协议的产生和发展[J].法制与社会,2011(1):252-253.
[2]姚洪军.从著作权与邻接权的关系谈网络服务提供者权[J].山东行政学院学报,2013(12):121-125.
[3]上官凯云.信息网络传播者邻接权保护的构想——以网络深层链接中被链网站利益为视角[J].传播与版权,2016(1):181-183.
[4]上海汉涛信息咨询有限公司诉爱帮聚信(北京)科技有限公司、爱帮聚信(北京)信息技术有限公司不正当竞争纠纷一案[EB/OL].[2017-02-21].http://www.110.com/panli/panli_25570151.html.
[5]侯长海.速途研究院:2015年移动新闻客户端市场报告[EB/OL].(2016-02-05)[2017-02-21].http://www.sootoo.com/content/660903.shtml.
[6]关于数据库法律保护的指令[EB/OL].(2011-02-01)[2017-02-21].http://www.docin.com/p-121916140.html.
[7]龚琳.自制视频作品的著作权冲突与利益平衡路径[J].三明学院学报,2016(1):44-49.
[8]李杨.欧盟数据库特殊权利保护制度的缺陷及其立法完善[J].法商研究,2003(4):26-35.
[9]洪学军.不当得利制度研究[D].重庆:西南政法大学,2003.
[10]柯实.今日头条:一个估值5亿美元的APP[J].创业家,2014(6):33-35.
[11]曾梦倩.网络环境下默示许可制度研究[D].北京:中国政法大学,2015.
[12]王雅,陈静华,贾菁菁.试论CC协议的产生和发展[J].法制与社会,2011(1):252-253.