中国战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响因素实证分析——以节能环保产业为例
|
摘要
以2013—2016年我国沪深A股上市的86家节能环保产业公司数据为样本,分别以当年专利授予数量、会计业绩、市场业绩和市场需求作为创新绩效的测量指标,对中国战略性新兴产业的创新绩效影响因素进行了实证分析。结果表明:当年专利申请数量、当年专利拥有数量均与当年专利授予数量显著正相关,当年专利申请数量与会计业绩显著正相关,研发费用占比与会计业绩显著负相关,当年专利拥有数量、研发费用占比均与市场业绩显著负相关,当年专利拥有数量与市场需求显著正相关,研发费用占比与市场需求显著负相关,而政府补贴占期末资产总额的比例、研发人员占比对创新绩效的影响均不显著。
Based on the data sample from 2013 to 2016 of 86 listed companies of energy conservation and environment protection industry on A-share markets of China, this paper conducts an empirical analysis on the influencing factors of innovation performance in China's strategic emerging industries, with measurement indices including the number of patents granted, accounting performance, market performance and market demand. The results indicate that there are significant positive correlations between the number of patents application and the number of patents granted, between the number of patents owned and the number of patents granted, and between the number of patents application and accounting performance of the same year. There are significant negative correlations between the proportion of R&D expenses and accounting performance of the same year, between the number of patents owned and market performance of the same year, and between the proportion of R&D expenses and market performance. There is a significant positive correlation between the number of patents owned and market demand of the same year, but a significant negative correlation between the proportion of R&D expenses and market demand. There is no significant difference between the proportion of government subsidies out of the total assets and innovation performance, or between the proportion of R&D personnel and innovation performance.
Based on the data sample from 2013 to 2016 of 86 listed companies of energy conservation and environment protection industry on A-share markets of China, this paper conducts an empirical analysis on the influencing factors of innovation performance in China's strategic emerging industries, with measurement indices including the number of patents granted, accounting performance, market performance and market demand. The results indicate that there are significant positive correlations between the number of patents application and the number of patents granted, between the number of patents owned and the number of patents granted, and between the number of patents application and accounting performance of the same year. There are significant negative correlations between the proportion of R&D expenses and accounting performance of the same year, between the number of patents owned and market performance of the same year, and between the proportion of R&D expenses and market performance. There is a significant positive correlation between the number of patents owned and market demand of the same year, but a significant negative correlation between the proportion of R&D expenses and market demand. There is no significant difference between the proportion of government subsidies out of the total assets and innovation performance, or between the proportion of R&D personnel and innovation performance.
引文
[1] SCHERER F M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented Inventions [J]. American economic review, 1965(5) :1097-1125.
[2] BRANCH B. Research and development activity and profitability: a distributed lag analysis [J]. Journal of political economy, 1974(82):999-1011.
[3] GRILICHES Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth [J]. Bell journal of economics, 1979(1):92-116.
[4] HAGEDOORN J, CLOODT M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? [J]. Research policy, 2003(8):1365-1379.
[5] LEE S, PARK G, YOON B, et al. Open innovation in SMEs— An intermediated network model [J]. Research policy, 2010(2):290-300.
[6] NOLA H D, STEPHEN R. Output additionality of public support for Innovation: evidence for Irish manufacturing plants [J]. European planning studies, 2010(1):107-122.
[7] TENG D, YI J. Impact of ownership types on R&D intensity and innovation performance-evidence from transitional China [J]. 中国工商管理研究前沿,2017(1):1.
[8] CHUNG D, KIM M J, KANG J. Influence of alliance portfolio diversity on innovation performance: the role of internal capabilities of value creation [J]. Review of managerial science, 2018(2):1-28.
[9] 朱晋伟,梅静娴. 不同规模企业间创新绩效影响因素比较研究:基于面板数据半参数模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(2):83-91.
[10] 郑春美,李佩. 政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响:基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015(16):83-87.
[11] 吕明洁,陈瑜,曹莉萍. 中国新能源企业创新绩效的影响因素:基于产业政策视角[J].技术经济,2016(1):43-50.
[12] 陈鲁夫,邵云飞. “钻石模型”视角下战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响因素的实证研究:以新一代信息产业为例[J].技术经济,2017(2):1-7,116.
[13] 王婧,吴烨伟,蓝梦,等. 基于高阶梯队理论的电子工业创新绩效影响因素研究:高管认知研究视角[J].工业技术经济,2018(3):20-27.
[14] 张玉臣,吕宪鹏.高新技术企业创新绩效影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2013 (12) :58-65.
[15] 王文霞. 河南省战略性新兴产业自主创新能力评价研究[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,11(2):96-103.
[2] BRANCH B. Research and development activity and profitability: a distributed lag analysis [J]. Journal of political economy, 1974(82):999-1011.
[3] GRILICHES Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth [J]. Bell journal of economics, 1979(1):92-116.
[4] HAGEDOORN J, CLOODT M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? [J]. Research policy, 2003(8):1365-1379.
[5] LEE S, PARK G, YOON B, et al. Open innovation in SMEs— An intermediated network model [J]. Research policy, 2010(2):290-300.
[6] NOLA H D, STEPHEN R. Output additionality of public support for Innovation: evidence for Irish manufacturing plants [J]. European planning studies, 2010(1):107-122.
[7] TENG D, YI J. Impact of ownership types on R&D intensity and innovation performance-evidence from transitional China [J]. 中国工商管理研究前沿,2017(1):1.
[8] CHUNG D, KIM M J, KANG J. Influence of alliance portfolio diversity on innovation performance: the role of internal capabilities of value creation [J]. Review of managerial science, 2018(2):1-28.
[9] 朱晋伟,梅静娴. 不同规模企业间创新绩效影响因素比较研究:基于面板数据半参数模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(2):83-91.
[10] 郑春美,李佩. 政府补助与税收优惠对企业创新绩效的影响:基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015(16):83-87.
[11] 吕明洁,陈瑜,曹莉萍. 中国新能源企业创新绩效的影响因素:基于产业政策视角[J].技术经济,2016(1):43-50.
[12] 陈鲁夫,邵云飞. “钻石模型”视角下战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响因素的实证研究:以新一代信息产业为例[J].技术经济,2017(2):1-7,116.
[13] 王婧,吴烨伟,蓝梦,等. 基于高阶梯队理论的电子工业创新绩效影响因素研究:高管认知研究视角[J].工业技术经济,2018(3):20-27.
[14] 张玉臣,吕宪鹏.高新技术企业创新绩效影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2013 (12) :58-65.
[15] 王文霞. 河南省战略性新兴产业自主创新能力评价研究[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,11(2):96-103.