基于年龄差异视角的保障性住房福利效应测度——以西安市为例
|
摘要
以西安市城五区和长安区经济适用房为研究对象,基于年龄差异视角,运用森的可行能力理论,构建了模糊综合评价模型,对西安市保障性住房总体福利体系和不同年龄段保障对象的福利效应进行了量化评价。结果显示:被保障对象入住保障性住房后福利水平有所上升,其居住条件、生活条件、教育条件均得到改善,但交通条件、工作机会、心理因素却有不同程度恶化;年龄差异对保障性住房的福利效应具有不同的影响,被保障对象在55-70岁年龄段的福利变化最大,而25-35岁年龄段的被保障对象福利上升水平最低。
Based on the perspective of age difference and using Sen's Theory of Capability Approach,this essay develops a welfare appraisal system of affordable housing in Xi'an and makes a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the changes in welfare after the occupancy of affordable housing. The results show that: Firstly,the object of protection has increased its fuzzy evaluation value after staying in affordable housing,however,living conditions and educational conditions have been improved,while traffic conditions,job opportunities and psychological factors have been worsened to varying degrees; Secondly,age differences influence the welfare effects of affordable housing,and the welfare of the security recipients who are 55-70 years old has the most changes with a 15% increase in the level of benefits,however,the level of welfare of 25-35 years old has the lowest increase.
Based on the perspective of age difference and using Sen's Theory of Capability Approach,this essay develops a welfare appraisal system of affordable housing in Xi'an and makes a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the changes in welfare after the occupancy of affordable housing. The results show that: Firstly,the object of protection has increased its fuzzy evaluation value after staying in affordable housing,however,living conditions and educational conditions have been improved,while traffic conditions,job opportunities and psychological factors have been worsened to varying degrees; Secondly,age differences influence the welfare effects of affordable housing,and the welfare of the security recipients who are 55-70 years old has the most changes with a 15% increase in the level of benefits,however,the level of welfare of 25-35 years old has the lowest increase.
引文
[1]踪程,闫浩,陈立文.住房品质、公共物品供给与保障房居民福利[J].经济问题,2017(2):51-55
[2]中国网.国务院关于进一步深化城镇住房制度改革加快住房建设的通知[EB/OL].http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7058347.htm,2006-08-08
[3]新华网.中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016lh/2016-03/17/c_1118366322.htm,2016-03-17
[4]新华网.十八届中央纪律检查委员会向中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会的工作报告[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-10/29/c_1121873020.htm,2017-10-29
[5]吴莹,陈俊华.保障性住房的住户满意度和影响因素分析:基于香港公屋的调查[J].经济社会体制比较,2013(4):109-117
[6]Mohit M A,Azim M.Assessment of Residential Satisfaction with Public Housing in Hulhumale’,Maldives[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012(50):756-770
[7]Kapuria P.A Human Well-Being Perspective to the Measurement of Quality of Life:Findings From the City of Delhi[J].Applied Research Quality Life,2016(11):125-145
[8]李梦玄,周义.保障房建设的社会福利效应测度和实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2012(5):29-34
[9]许崴.试论福利经济学的发展轨迹与演变[J].国际经贸探索,2009(12):28-31
[10]阿马蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:29-33
[11]高进云,周智,乔志峰.森的可行能力理论框架下土地征收对农民福利的影响测度[J].科技与社会,2010(12):59-69
[12]胡国平,韦春丽.保障性住房租购选择研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(7):120-127
[13]方福前,吕文慧.中国城镇居民福利水平影响因素分析---基于阿马蒂亚·森的能力方法和结构方程模型[J].管理世界,2009(4):17-26
[14]Lemmi A,Betti G.Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement[M].Springer,2006:115-137
[15]Zain S,Milioli M A,Morlini I.Fuzzy Composite Indicators:An Application for Measuring Customer Satisfaction[C].Torelli N,Pesarin F,Bar-Hen A.Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics.Berlin:Springer,2013:243-253
[16]郑童,吕斌,张纯.基于模糊评价法的宜居社区评价研究[J].城市发展研究,2011(9):118-124
[17]Cerioli A,Zani S.A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty[C].Dagum C,Zenga M.Income and Wealth Distribution,Inequality and Poverty.Berlin:Springer,1990:272-284
[18]高进云,乔志峰.森的可行能力框架下福利模糊评价的权重结构讨论[J].软科学,2010(6):133-136
[19]陕西省教育厅.关于印发《城市新建居住区配套规划建设幼儿园、小学的指导意见的通知》[EB/OL].http://www.snedu.gov.cn/fwpt/xueqianjiaoyuzhengce/201107/26/35.html,2015-07-26
[20]方永恒,张瑞.保障房退出机制存在的问题及其解决途径[J].城市问题,2013(14):79-83
[2]中国网.国务院关于进一步深化城镇住房制度改革加快住房建设的通知[EB/OL].http://www.china.com.cn/law/flfg/txt/2006-08/08/content_7058347.htm,2006-08-08
[3]新华网.中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016lh/2016-03/17/c_1118366322.htm,2016-03-17
[4]新华网.十八届中央纪律检查委员会向中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会的工作报告[EB/OL].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-10/29/c_1121873020.htm,2017-10-29
[5]吴莹,陈俊华.保障性住房的住户满意度和影响因素分析:基于香港公屋的调查[J].经济社会体制比较,2013(4):109-117
[6]Mohit M A,Azim M.Assessment of Residential Satisfaction with Public Housing in Hulhumale’,Maldives[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012(50):756-770
[7]Kapuria P.A Human Well-Being Perspective to the Measurement of Quality of Life:Findings From the City of Delhi[J].Applied Research Quality Life,2016(11):125-145
[8]李梦玄,周义.保障房建设的社会福利效应测度和实证研究[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2012(5):29-34
[9]许崴.试论福利经济学的发展轨迹与演变[J].国际经贸探索,2009(12):28-31
[10]阿马蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:29-33
[11]高进云,周智,乔志峰.森的可行能力理论框架下土地征收对农民福利的影响测度[J].科技与社会,2010(12):59-69
[12]胡国平,韦春丽.保障性住房租购选择研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017(7):120-127
[13]方福前,吕文慧.中国城镇居民福利水平影响因素分析---基于阿马蒂亚·森的能力方法和结构方程模型[J].管理世界,2009(4):17-26
[14]Lemmi A,Betti G.Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement[M].Springer,2006:115-137
[15]Zain S,Milioli M A,Morlini I.Fuzzy Composite Indicators:An Application for Measuring Customer Satisfaction[C].Torelli N,Pesarin F,Bar-Hen A.Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics.Berlin:Springer,2013:243-253
[16]郑童,吕斌,张纯.基于模糊评价法的宜居社区评价研究[J].城市发展研究,2011(9):118-124
[17]Cerioli A,Zani S.A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty[C].Dagum C,Zenga M.Income and Wealth Distribution,Inequality and Poverty.Berlin:Springer,1990:272-284
[18]高进云,乔志峰.森的可行能力框架下福利模糊评价的权重结构讨论[J].软科学,2010(6):133-136
[19]陕西省教育厅.关于印发《城市新建居住区配套规划建设幼儿园、小学的指导意见的通知》[EB/OL].http://www.snedu.gov.cn/fwpt/xueqianjiaoyuzhengce/201107/26/35.html,2015-07-26
[20]方永恒,张瑞.保障房退出机制存在的问题及其解决途径[J].城市问题,2013(14):79-83