广元烟区烤烟质量特点研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Quality Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco in Guangyuan Tobacco-growing Area
  • 作者:顾会战 ; 尹振华 ; 何佶弦 ; 王栋 ; 喻晓 ; 张启莉 ; 邵惠芳
  • 英文作者:GU Hui-zhan;YIN Zhen-hua;HE Ji-xian;WANG Dong;YU Xiao;ZHANG Qi-li;SHAO Hui-fang;Guangyuan Tobacco Corporation of Tobacco Co.,Ltd.of Sichuan Province;College of Tobacco,Henan Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:烤烟 ; 质量特点 ; 广元烟区
  • 英文关键词:flue-cured tobacco;;quality characteristics;;Guangyuan tobacco-growing area
  • 中文刊名:ANHE
  • 英文刊名:Modern Agricultural Science and Technology
  • 机构:四川省烟草公司广元市公司;河南农业大学烟草学院;
  • 出版日期:2017-06-19 17:01
  • 出版单位:现代农业科技
  • 年:2017
  • 期:No.697
  • 基金:四川省烟草公司科技计划项目
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ANHE201711147
  • 页数:4
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:34-1278/S
  • 分类号:246-248+250
摘要
选取了广元烟区2014—2015年间的75份烤烟样品,通过检测其外观质量、常规化学成分和感官评吸质量,分析了广元烟区烤烟的主要质量特点。结果表明,广元烟叶成熟度在尚熟和成熟之间;烟叶颜色多以桔黄为主;叶片结构多为尚疏松或疏松;叶片身份除部分烟叶稍有不同程度偏厚或稍薄外,其他较为适中;大部分等级叶片色度在中等以上;油分多为有、较多或多;化学成分和感官评吸质量整体适宜。广元烤烟外观质量、常规化学成分和感官评吸质量在年份间表现整体稳定,在地点间以剑阁县烟叶变异较小,旺苍县烟叶变异较大。
        75 flue-cured tobacco samples from Guangyuan tobacco growing area in 2014 —2015 were selected.The main quality characteristics of flue-cured tobacco in Guangyuan tobacco growing area were analyzed by testing the appearance quality,chemical composition and sensory evaluation quality.The results showed that the maturity of Guangyuan tobacco was between ripe and ripening;the color of tobacco leaves was mostly orange,and the leaf structure was mostly loose or looser.The leaves had some different thicknesses or slightly thinner,the other was more moderate;most of the grade of leaf color were in the middle;oil was have,relatively more or more;chemical composition and sensory evaluation of the overall quality were appropriate.The appearance quality,conventional chemical composition and sensory evaluation quality of Guangyuan flue-cured tobacco were statistically stable among years,and the variation of tobacco leaf in the Jiange County was small,the variation of tobacco leaf in Wangcang County was significant.
引文
[1]闫克玉,赵献章.烟叶分级[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003.
    [2]王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏.中国烟草种植区划[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [3]贾琳,刘春奎,许嘉阳,等.河南烤烟常规化学成分与感官质量的关系研究[J].轻工科技,2016(6):38-40.
    [4]潘义宏,李佳佳,蒋美红,等.烟叶外观质量、常规化学成分与其感官质量的典型相关分析[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):384-388.
    [5]孟恺琳,周清明,黎娟,等.湖南浓香型烟区烤烟上部烟叶外观质量分析[J].作物研究,2016,30(1):54-57.
    [6]汤朝起,刘伟,潘红源,等.烤烟外观质量的评价延伸指标与内在品质的关系[J].烟草科技,2011(9):71-74.
    [7]吴殿信,袁志永,闫克玉,等.烤烟各等级烟叶质量指数的确定[J].烟草科技,2001(12):9-15.
    [8]章新军,黎妍妍,许自成,等.河南烤烟外观与内在质量的综合评价[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(7):1953-1954.
    [9]子建军,王改丽,叶贤文,等.四川会理烟区烤烟质量综合评价[J].湖南农业科学,2010(3):90-94.
    [10]李永正,杨虹琦.烟叶外观质量与内在质量相关性研究进展[J].作物研究,2012,26(7):147-150.
    [11]顾会战,鲁黎明,吴绍军.广元烟区烤烟化学成分年度间变异分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(34):19305-19307.
    [12]扈强,刘新民,杜咏梅,等.重庆烟区烤烟质量特点研究[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(13):83-85.
    [13]曹景林,程君奇,李亚培,等.从品种角度试论提高中国烤烟质量的途径[J].中国农学通报,2015(22):75-87.
    [14]阎克玉,袁志永,吴殿信,等.烤烟质量评价指标体系研究[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2001(4):57-61.
    [15]常爱霞,瞿永生,计玉,等.福建产区不同香型烤烟质量特征分析[J].中国烟草科学,2011(4):1-5.
    [16]曹建敏,刘帅帅,郭承芳,等.GC/MS指纹图谱在南平烤烟质量控制中的应用[J].华南农业大学学报,2013(1):1-5.
    [17]于建军,王改丽,叶贤文,等.四川会理烟区烤烟质量综合评价[J].湖南农业科学,2010(3):90-94.
    [18]马京民,马聪,王建刚,等.灵山烟区生态环境及其烤烟质量评价[J].中国农业科技导报,2006(5):83-89.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700