虚假诉讼法律规制模式之现实境遇及制度改善
|
摘要
对虚假诉讼概念、虚假诉讼产生原因的梳理是破解虚假诉讼的基础。现有的规制虚假诉讼的模式、驳回诉讼请求方法与诉讼要件理论冲突,应并轨实行驳回起诉手段。积极引导第三人参诉,阐明执行案外人异议之诉和案外人申请再审诉讼标的区别;归纳第三人撤销之诉的不足及与执行中案外人申请再审和诉后案外人申请再审的适用顺序;同时,可设立案外第三人另诉制度,主张该制度与第三人撤销之诉整合,使权益受侵害的案外人完整及时地维护自身利益。
The analysis of the concept and cause of false litigation is the basis to figure out it. The existing model of governing false litigation and the method of rejecting lawsuit conflict with the litigation requirements,so we should be in line with rejecting lawsuit. We should actively guide the third party to participate in the lawsuit,clarify the difference between the outer party dissidence and the application of the outer party for the retrial,generalize the deficiency of the suit of the third party discharging the judgement and adjust the order of the outer party's application for retrial during execution or after suit. At the same time,the another lawsuit system of the third party in executive case can be established,advocating the integration of the system with the suit of the third party discharging the judgement,so that the outer party who has been infringed on their rights and interests will safeguard their own interests in a timely and complete manner.
The analysis of the concept and cause of false litigation is the basis to figure out it. The existing model of governing false litigation and the method of rejecting lawsuit conflict with the litigation requirements,so we should be in line with rejecting lawsuit. We should actively guide the third party to participate in the lawsuit,clarify the difference between the outer party dissidence and the application of the outer party for the retrial,generalize the deficiency of the suit of the third party discharging the judgement and adjust the order of the outer party's application for retrial during execution or after suit. At the same time,the another lawsuit system of the third party in executive case can be established,advocating the integration of the system with the suit of the third party discharging the judgement,so that the outer party who has been infringed on their rights and interests will safeguard their own interests in a timely and complete manner.
引文
[1]王胜明.中华人民共和国民事诉讼法释义[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:269.
[2]许可.论当事人主义诉讼模式在我国法上的新进展[J].当代法学,2016(3):12.
[3]汉斯·约阿希姆·穆泽拉克.德国民事诉讼法基础教程[M].傅郁林,编.周翠,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005:74.
[4]高桥宏志.民事诉讼法制度与理论的深层分析[M].林剑锋,译.北京:法律出版社,2003:206.
[5]张卫平.民事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:119-120.
[6]姜群,相蒙.建立案外人诈害防止参加之诉制度分析[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1):151.
[7]张卫平,任重.案外第三人权益程序保障体系研究[J].法律科学,2014(6):136.
[8]张卫平.“第三人”类型划分及展开[J].民事程序法研究,2004(00):80.
[9]张卫平.民事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:286.
[2]许可.论当事人主义诉讼模式在我国法上的新进展[J].当代法学,2016(3):12.
[3]汉斯·约阿希姆·穆泽拉克.德国民事诉讼法基础教程[M].傅郁林,编.周翠,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005:74.
[4]高桥宏志.民事诉讼法制度与理论的深层分析[M].林剑锋,译.北京:法律出版社,2003:206.
[5]张卫平.民事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:119-120.
[6]姜群,相蒙.建立案外人诈害防止参加之诉制度分析[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(1):151.
[7]张卫平,任重.案外第三人权益程序保障体系研究[J].法律科学,2014(6):136.
[8]张卫平.“第三人”类型划分及展开[J].民事程序法研究,2004(00):80.
[9]张卫平.民事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:286.