基层医院老年白内障患者超声乳化术预后效果及并发症危险因素分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of Prognosis and Risk Factors of Phacoemulsification in Elderly Patients with Cataract in Primary Hospitals
  • 作者:钟启文 ; 李清云
  • 英文作者:ZHONG Qi-wen;LI Qing-yun;Wuping County Hospital;
  • 关键词:白内障 ; 超声乳化手术 ; 基层医院 ; 并发症
  • 英文关键词:Cataract;;Phacoemulsification surgery;;Primary hospital;;Complications
  • 中文刊名:HZZZ
  • 英文刊名:China & Foreign Medical Treatment
  • 机构:武平县医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-11
  • 出版单位:中外医疗
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HZZZ201905013
  • 页数:4
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-5625/R
  • 分类号:43-46
摘要
目的探究基层医院老年白内障患者行超声乳化手术效果,并分析并发症发病情况,从而为预防手术并发症,提高手术效果提供科学的参考。方法该研究方便选择2017年1月—2018年1月期间因白内障入院接受超声乳化手术的老年患者210例作为研究对象进行回顾性分析,记录患者出现术中、术后出现并发症的例数,并分析并发症发生原因,通过病例筛选法,研究组为存在并发症的老年白内障患者43例(50只眼),对照组是随机抽取未出现并发症的60例患者(70只眼)。结果在基层医院行超声乳化手术并发症主要包括后囊膜破裂、虹膜损伤、角膜内皮水肿等;研究组患者术前视力低于0.1者(36.00%)高于对照组(15.71%),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=6.549,P=0.01);研究组患者光感-手动(26.0%)、数指(22.0%)高于对照组(8.57%5.71%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);将术后是否出现并发症作为作为因变量,多因素logistic回归分析结果显示冠心病(OR=2.609,P=0.037)、晶状体核分级(OR=3.368,P=0.011)、术前视力(OR=2.431,P=0.016)、玻璃体手术史(OR=2.365,P=0.038)、切口靠前(OR=2.583,P=0.015)、后弹力层撕脱(OR=2.476,P=0.017)与白内障超声乳化手术并发症呈相关性(P<0.05)。两组患者术后最佳矫正视力对比,研究组患者术后1 d(t=3.979,P=0.0001)和术后1周视力(t=4.093,P=0.0001),均相对于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对基层医院开展的老年白内障患者白内障超声乳化术时,需要积极提升手术质量、熟练掌握手术技巧,争取零失误。针对高危因素,采用多种途径进行干预,减少术中、术后并发症出现,促进术后视力恢复。
        Objective To investigate the effect of phacoemulsification in elderly patients with cataract in primary hospitals,and to analyze the incidence of complications, so as to provide a scientific reference for preventing surgical complications and improving the surgical results. Methods A total of 210 elderly patients who underwent phacoemulsification after cataract surgery from January 2017 to January 2018 were convenient retrospectively analyzed. The number of complications occurred during and after surgery was recorded. The causes of complications were analyzed. The case screening method was performed in 43 patients(50 eyes) with complication of elderly cataract. The control group was randomly selected from 60 patients(70 eyes) who had no complications. Results The complications of phacoemulsification in primary hospitals included posterior capsule rupture, iris injury, and corneal endothelial edema. The preoperative visual acuity of the study group was less than 0.1(36.00%), which was higher than that of the control group(15.71%), with statistical significance(χ~2=6.549,P=0.01); light sensitivity-manual(26.0%) and number(22.0%) were higher in the study group than in the control group(8.57% 5.71%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05); whether the postoperative complications occurred as a dependent variable, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed coronary heart disease(OR=2.609, P=0.037), lens nuclear grading(OR=3.368, P=0.011), preoperative visual acuity(OR=2.431, P=0.016), vitrectomy history(OR=2.365, P=0.038), incision front(OR=2.583, P=0.015), posterior elastic layer avulsion(OR=2.476, P=0.017) was associated with complication of phacoemulsification(P<0.05). The best corrected visual acuity was compared between the two groups. One day after surgery(t=3.979, P=0.000 1) and one week postoperative visual acuity(t=4.093, P=0.000 1), the difference was compared with the control group, being statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion In the phacoemulsification of cataract patients with cataract in primary hospitals, it is necessary to actively improve the quality of surgery, master the surgical skills,and strive for zero mistakes. In response to high-risk factors, multiple interventions are used to reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications and to promote postoperative visual recovery.
引文
[1]于新华,于佳艺.超声乳化手术与小切口非超声乳化手术治疗白内障临床疗效[J].国际眼科杂志,2016,16(1):94-96.
    [2]高云仙,银丽,赵勇.小切口非超声乳化白内障摘除术的临床效果观察[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(13):2691-2692.
    [3]李国梁,秦礼宝,薛源,等.小切口非超声乳化手术与超声乳化治疗白内障的对比研究[J].南昌大学学报:医学版,2014,54(9):53-58.
    [4]章露易,徐雯,姚克.超声乳化白内障吸除术中晶状体后囊膜破裂风险因素分析[J].中华眼科杂志,2015,51(4):282-287.
    [5]李谟汉,符小林,羊文芳.不同术式对高度近视眼白内障患者角膜水肿及影响因素的logistic分析[J].眼科新进展,2016,36(10):936-939.
    [6]李达,王丽丽,朱飞.超声乳化白内障吸除术中发生晶状体后囊膜破裂的危险因素分析[T].宁夏医科大学学报,2016,38(8):941-944.
    [7]叶雷.小切口非超声乳化白内障囊外摘除术治疗高龄白内障患者的效果观察[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(7):1266-1267.
    [8]周黎纹,谢玉秀.不同切口超声乳化联合小梁切除术治疗白内障合并青光眼临床疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志2018,47(5):623-626.
    [9]张英瑜,余磊,张倩倩,等.透明角膜切口超声乳化白内障吸除人工晶状体植入术并发症回顾性分析[J].中国现代医生,2018,56(10):70-73,76.
    [10]于琼,王剑锋.糖尿病性白内障患者超声乳化术后角膜水肿相关因素[J].国际眼科杂志,2018,18(2):252-254.
    [11]张琳琳.超声乳化白内障摘出并人工晶状体植入术后发生角膜水肿的影响因素回顾性分析[J].当代医学,2018,24(1):123-125.
    [12]邵玉红,陈肖,赵海岚,等.晶状体超声乳化联合人工晶体植入术对合并年龄相关黄斑变性的白内障患者视功能和生存质量的影响[J].中国全科医学,2015,18(17):2038-2042.
    [13]曹燕,赵俊宏,梁厚成,等.超声乳化白内障吸除术和小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术在高龄白内障患者中的疗效对比分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志:电子版,2014,6(10):29-33.
    [14]Lara SA,Cakiner ET.Diabetes and cataract surgery:preoperative risk factors and positive nursing interventions[J].Insight,2014,39(2):18-20.
    [15]Indaram M,Agron E,Clemons TE,et al.Changes in lens opacities on the age-related eye disease study grading scale predict progression to cataract surgery and vision loss:age-related eye disease study[J].Ophthalmology,2015,122(5):888-896.
    [16]杜婷婷,王晓媛.白内障超声乳化吸除人工晶状体植入术后患者低视力的影响因素[J].临床眼科杂志,2018,26(4)347-350.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700