正常人与早期颈髓损伤患者MRI表观弥散系数的比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Difference of MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Patients with Early Cervical Spinal Cord Injury from Healthy People
  • 作者:卫波 ; 周红俊 ; 李建军 ; 徐建民 ; 刘根林 ; 郑樱 ; 郝春霞 ; 张缨 ; 王一吉 ; 康海琼 ; 逯晓蕾 ; 袁媛
  • 英文作者:WEI Bo;ZHOU Hong-jun;LI Jian-jun;XU Jian-min;LIU Gen-lin;ZHENG Ying;HAO Chun-xia;ZHANG Ying;WANG Yi-ji;KANG Hai-qiong;LU Xiao-lei;YUAN Yuan;Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine;Beijing Bo'ai Hospital,China Rehabilitation Research Center;
  • 关键词:颈髓损伤 ; 表观弥散系数 ; 弥散加权成像 ; 磁共振成像
  • 英文关键词:cervical spinal cord injury;;apparent diffusion coefficient;;diffusion weighted imaging;;magnetic resonance imaging
  • 中文刊名:ZKLS
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
  • 机构:首都医科大学康复医学院;中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院脊髓损伤康复科;中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院脊柱脊髓外科;中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院医学影像科;
  • 出版日期:2015-04-23 16:32
  • 出版单位:中国康复理论与实践
  • 年:2015
  • 期:v.21;No.185
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZKLS201504007
  • 页数:3
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-3759/R
  • 分类号:26-28
摘要
目的比较正常人与早期颈髓损伤患者表观弥散系数(ADC)的变化。方法对18例早期颈损患者和5例健康对照者进行MRI T1WI、T2WI和弥散加权成像(DWI)检查,获得颈髓不同平面的ADC值和ADC图。结果和结论早期颈髓患者的ADC值低于健康人,两者分界点为800.0×10-6mm2/s;部分MRI检查无明显异常信号的患者ADC值也下降。
        Objective To compare the apparent diffusion coefficients(ADC) between healthy people and patients with early cervical spinal cord injury(SCI). Methods 18 patients with early cervical SCI and 5 healthy controls were examined with MRI T1 WI, T2 WI and DWI,and the ADC values and ADC maps were obtained. Results and Conclusion ADC values were less in the patients than in the healthy controls, and the cut-off point was 800.0×10-6mm2/s. ADC values also reduced in some patients without obvious abnormal MRI finds.
引文
[1]周天健,李建军.脊柱脊髓损伤现代康复与治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:483-487.
    [2]Ma X,Zhao X,Ouyang H,et al.Predictive value of diffusion-weighted imaging histogram in evaluation of the response to radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi,2014,36(12):905-909.
    [3]Iosif C,Camilleri Y,Saleme S,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemic lesions associated with flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms:safety,potential mechanisms,clinical outcome,and concerns[J].J Neurosurg,2015,122(3):627-636.
    [4]Ishida G,Oishi M,Morii K,et al.Application of brain diffusion-weighted imaging performed using readout segmentation of long variable echo trains[J].No Shinkei Geka,2015,43(1):31-40.
    [5]Nagashima H,Doi K,Ogura T,et al.Automated adjustment of display conditions in brain MR images:diffusion-weighted MRIs and apparent diffusion coefficient maps for hyperacute ischemic stroke[J].Radiol Phys Technol,2013,6(1):202-209.
    [6]Thomas RG,Lymer GK,Armitage PA,et al.Apparent diffusion coefficient thresholds and diffusion lesion volume in acute stroke[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2013,22(7):906-909.
    [7]Aoki J,Tateishi Y,Cummings CL,et al.Collateral flow and brain changes on computed tomography angiography predict infarct volume on early diffusion-weighted imaging[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2014,23(10):2845-2850.
    [8]Chandarana H,Taouli B.Diffusion and perfusion imaging of the liver[J].Eur J Radiol,2010,76(3):348-358.
    [9]卫波,周红俊,徐建民,等.磁共振表观弥散系数在早期颈髓损伤诊断中的临床应用[J].中国康复理论与实践,2014,20(8):723-727.
    [10]Ramírez-Galván YA,Cardona-Huerta S,Ibarra-Fombona E,et al.Apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions:correlation with pathological findings[J].Clin Imaging,2015,39(1):51-55.
    [11]Dale BM,Braithwaite AC,Boll DT,et al.Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen[J].Invest Radiol,2010,45(2):104-108.
    [12]Lu H,Lei X.The apparent diffusion coefficient does not reflect cytotoxic edema on the uninjured side after traumatic brain injury[J].Neural Regen Res,2014,9(9):973-977.
    [13]Nakamura T,Yoshizako T,Araki H,et al.The relation between apparent diffusion coefficient and clinical stage of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma[J].Clin Imaging,2015,39(1):72-75.
    [14]Liu S,Guan W,Wang H,et al.Apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging:correlations with the histological differentiation and Lauren classification[J].Eur J Radiol,2014,83(12):2122-2128.
    [15]Yu X,Liu S,Chen Z,et al.Correlations between MRI apparent diffusion coefficient and histological grade and molecular biology of breast invasive ductal carcinoma[J].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi,2014,36(8):606-611.
    [16]Jurkiewicz E,Grajkowska W,Nowak K,et al.MR imaging,apparent diffusion coefficient and histopathological features of desmoplastic infantile tumors-own experience and review of the literature[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2015,31(2):251-259.
    [17]Mamata H,Jolesz FA,Maier SE.Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord:age and cervical spondylosis-related changes[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2005,22(1):38-43.
    [18]Pouw MH,van der Vliet AM,van Kampen A,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging within 24 h post-injury after traumatic spinal cord injury:a qualitative meta-analysis between T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in18 patients[J].Spinal Cord,2012,50(6):426-431.
    [19]Shanmuganathan K,Gullapalli RP,Zhuo J,et al.Diffusion tensor MR imaging in cervical spine trauma[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2008,29(4):655-659.
    [20]张劲松,宦怡,孙立军,等.扩散加权成像在脊髓急性外伤中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):464-468.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700