脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准检查表最新修订及解读
|
摘要
目的探讨最新版脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI-2013)检查表的修订之处及其意义。方法通过详细对比ASIA国际标准委员会提供的最新版ISNCSCI-2013检查表(英文版)与ISNCSCI-2011检查表(英文版),找出修订之处,同时根据ISNCSCI-2011检查表使用体会,分析其修订意义。结果与ISNCSCI-2011检查表相比,ISNCSCI-2013共有11处改动。新版的检查表更便于区分和强调某些条目,同时对某些条目进行了细化。结论 ASIA标准委员会根据应用ISNCSCI-2011检查表的实践体会,对该检查表进行较大的修改,提出了更加科学的记录方法,使之能更加直观、清楚地反映出检查结果。本次修订更有利于脊髓损伤神经功能评估结果的记录和判定。
Objective To study the modification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury(ISNCSCI) worksheet(2013 version) and the significance for clinical practice.Methods The latest English version of ISNCSCI worksheet-2013 was compared with the previous version to find the advantages of current version and analyze its significance according to the experience from using the worksheet-2011.Results 11 modifications were found in ISNCSCI-2013,in which some were just discrimination,some were for emphasis,and the others were detailing.Conclusion The ASIA International Standards Committee made prudent modifications according to the practical experience of the ISNCSCI-2011 to make the worksheet more scientific and clear for recording.The modification will be more beneficial to record and determine the evaluation results of neurological examination of spinal cord injury in clinical practice.
Objective To study the modification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury(ISNCSCI) worksheet(2013 version) and the significance for clinical practice.Methods The latest English version of ISNCSCI worksheet-2013 was compared with the previous version to find the advantages of current version and analyze its significance according to the experience from using the worksheet-2011.Results 11 modifications were found in ISNCSCI-2013,in which some were just discrimination,some were for emphasis,and the others were detailing.Conclusion The ASIA International Standards Committee made prudent modifications according to the practical experience of the ISNCSCI-2011 to make the worksheet more scientific and clear for recording.The modification will be more beneficial to record and determine the evaluation results of neurological examination of spinal cord injury in clinical practice.
引文
[1]Ditunno JF Jr,Young W,Donovan WH,et al.The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury[J].Paraplegia,1994,32(2):70-80.
[2]美国脊柱损伤协会,国际脊髓学会.李建军,周红俊,孙迎春,等,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(第6版,2006)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2008,14(7):693-698.
[3]李建军,王方永.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011年修订)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2011,17(10):963-972.
[4]李建军,周红俊,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准参考手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
[5]Waring WP 3rd,Biering-Sorenson F,Burns S,et al.2009 reviews and revisions of the international standards for the neurological classification of spinal cord injury[J].J Spinal Cord Med,2010,33(4):346-352.
[6]美国脊髓损伤协会,国际脊髓损伤学会.李建军,王方永,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ASIA 2011版)最新修订及标准解读[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(8):797-800.
[7]ASIA Learning Center[OL].www.asialearningcenter.com.
[2]美国脊柱损伤协会,国际脊髓学会.李建军,周红俊,孙迎春,等,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(第6版,2006)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2008,14(7):693-698.
[3]李建军,王方永.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011年修订)[J].中国康复理论与实践,2011,17(10):963-972.
[4]李建军,周红俊,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准参考手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
[5]Waring WP 3rd,Biering-Sorenson F,Burns S,et al.2009 reviews and revisions of the international standards for the neurological classification of spinal cord injury[J].J Spinal Cord Med,2010,33(4):346-352.
[6]美国脊髓损伤协会,国际脊髓损伤学会.李建军,王方永,译.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ASIA 2011版)最新修订及标准解读[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(8):797-800.
[7]ASIA Learning Center[OL].www.asialearningcenter.com.