刑事速裁程序的实证研究——以醉酒型危险驾驶罪判决书为例
|
摘要
刑事速裁程序是一种新的诉讼机制,通过判决书可以分析出该机制的运行状况。以适用速裁程序和不适用速裁程序的危险驾驶罪判决书为样本,在强制措施、刑罚、公正与效率、拘役刑期的影响因素等方面进行数据统计和对比分析,反映出判决书的主要问题是公正与效率呈现碎片化景象。这可以通过判决书的繁简分流与说理改革来探讨适用速裁程序的填空式判决书制作模式,并可以倒逼速裁程序的正当化设计。
The criminal rapid trial procedure is a new litigation mechanism., through the judgment,we can analyze the operation of the mechanism. Taking sentences of dangerous driving conviction as samples, in the impact of coercive measures,punishment, justice and efficiency, the term of criminal detention and other factors of data statistics and comparative analysis,reflecting the main problem is the judgment of justice and efficiency is the fragmentation of the scene. The classification and the reasoning of this can be done by the judgment of the reform of judgment to fill in the blanks for the criminal rapid trial procedure production model, design and justification of forced speed cutting program.
The criminal rapid trial procedure is a new litigation mechanism., through the judgment,we can analyze the operation of the mechanism. Taking sentences of dangerous driving conviction as samples, in the impact of coercive measures,punishment, justice and efficiency, the term of criminal detention and other factors of data statistics and comparative analysis,reflecting the main problem is the judgment of justice and efficiency is the fragmentation of the scene. The classification and the reasoning of this can be done by the judgment of the reform of judgment to fill in the blanks for the criminal rapid trial procedure production model, design and justification of forced speed cutting program.
引文
[1]卞建林.我国刑事强制措施的功能回归与制度完善[J].中国法学,2011,(6):24.
[2]王贞会.刑事强制措施适用的宪政基础[J].中国刑事法杂志,2012,(1):65.
[3]章桦,李晓霞.醉酒型危险驾驶罪量刑特征及量刑模型构建实证研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014,(5):100.
[4]孙万怀.公开固然重要,说理更显公正[J].现代法学,2014,(2):44.
[5]李真,樊华中.刚弱两需分野下我国判决书说理模式新探[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(3):93.
[6]郭晶.刑事诉讼的速度干预理论初探[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014,(5):63
[7]郑丽萍.轻罪重罪之法定界分[J].中国法学,2013,(2):137-138.
[8]郑赫南.全国人大作出授权在部分地区开展刑事速裁程序试点决定[N].检察日报,2014-6-30.
[9][美]哈德罗·拉斯韦尔.社会传播的结构与功能[M].何道宽译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2013.35-36.
[10]袁靖华.媒介正义的概念及其维度[J].传播学研究,2012,(4):35.
[11]廖义铭.佩雷尔曼之新修辞学[M].唐山:唐山出版社,1997.53.
[12]焦宝乾.逻辑与修辞:一对法学范式的区分与关联[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(2):164.
[13]侯学勇,杨颖.法律修辞在中国国刑期的背景及其在司法审判中的作用[J].政法论丛,2012,(4):91.
[14]陈金钊.法律修辞方法与司法公正实现[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(5):152.
[2]王贞会.刑事强制措施适用的宪政基础[J].中国刑事法杂志,2012,(1):65.
[3]章桦,李晓霞.醉酒型危险驾驶罪量刑特征及量刑模型构建实证研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014,(5):100.
[4]孙万怀.公开固然重要,说理更显公正[J].现代法学,2014,(2):44.
[5]李真,樊华中.刚弱两需分野下我国判决书说理模式新探[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(3):93.
[6]郭晶.刑事诉讼的速度干预理论初探[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014,(5):63
[7]郑丽萍.轻罪重罪之法定界分[J].中国法学,2013,(2):137-138.
[8]郑赫南.全国人大作出授权在部分地区开展刑事速裁程序试点决定[N].检察日报,2014-6-30.
[9][美]哈德罗·拉斯韦尔.社会传播的结构与功能[M].何道宽译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2013.35-36.
[10]袁靖华.媒介正义的概念及其维度[J].传播学研究,2012,(4):35.
[11]廖义铭.佩雷尔曼之新修辞学[M].唐山:唐山出版社,1997.53.
[12]焦宝乾.逻辑与修辞:一对法学范式的区分与关联[J].法制与社会发展,2015,(2):164.
[13]侯学勇,杨颖.法律修辞在中国国刑期的背景及其在司法审判中的作用[J].政法论丛,2012,(4):91.
[14]陈金钊.法律修辞方法与司法公正实现[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(5):152.