廖伟立:“杂木林美学”与迷路的必要
|
摘要
廖伟立的建筑美学观,源自现代主义的基本信仰传统,却不断在其中寻找变奏与分枝发芽的可能。建筑材料的特质显现,虽然常扮演鲜明的角色,但廖伟立其实常是直接从形态着手,以显现建筑体的"势"与"韵",其中可以见到源自其论述的"杂木林美学"对于"多元与复杂"价值的实践意图与面貌,以及由此对现代建筑路线的反思可能。
Liao Wei-Li's views on architectural aesthetics, though rooted in the foundational precepts of modernism, are continually searching for possible variations upon this theme and for ways to sprout forth new branches.In his search for position and resonance, Liao Wei-Li avoids the defined and the anticipated solution, and instead chooses to approach an archetype of indefinable character which would be incorporated into his search for potentially new aesthetics.
Liao Wei-Li's views on architectural aesthetics, though rooted in the foundational precepts of modernism, are continually searching for possible variations upon this theme and for ways to sprout forth new branches.In his search for position and resonance, Liao Wei-Li avoids the defined and the anticipated solution, and instead chooses to approach an archetype of indefinable character which would be incorporated into his search for potentially new aesthetics.
引文
[1]阮庆岳.弱建筑——从“道德经”看台湾当代建筑[M].台北:田园城市出版社,2006.
[2]程绍正韬,谢英俊,廖伟立等.黏菌城市——台湾现代建筑的本体性[M].台北:田园城市出版社,2003.
[3]班雅明W.班雅明作品选:单行道、柏林童年[M].李士勋,徐小青译.台北:允晨实业,2003.
[4]克拉默S.本雅明[M].鲁路译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[5]薇依S.在期待之中[M].杜小真,顾嘉琛译.北京:三联书店,1996.
[6]巴赫金M M.陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题[M].白春仁,顾亚铃译.北京:三联书店,1988.
[7]艾布拉姆斯M H.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,张照进,童庆生译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[8]福泽谕吉.劝学[M].黄玉燕译.台北:联合文学出版社,2003.
[9]霍布邦斯E.资本的年代[M].王章辉等译.台北:麦田出版社,1997.
[10]阮庆岳.阅读亚洲当代建筑:30建筑师x 30关键词[M].北京:中国青年出版社,2011.
[2]程绍正韬,谢英俊,廖伟立等.黏菌城市——台湾现代建筑的本体性[M].台北:田园城市出版社,2003.
[3]班雅明W.班雅明作品选:单行道、柏林童年[M].李士勋,徐小青译.台北:允晨实业,2003.
[4]克拉默S.本雅明[M].鲁路译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[5]薇依S.在期待之中[M].杜小真,顾嘉琛译.北京:三联书店,1996.
[6]巴赫金M M.陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题[M].白春仁,顾亚铃译.北京:三联书店,1988.
[7]艾布拉姆斯M H.镜与灯:浪漫主义文论及批评传统[M].郦稚牛,张照进,童庆生译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[8]福泽谕吉.劝学[M].黄玉燕译.台北:联合文学出版社,2003.
[9]霍布邦斯E.资本的年代[M].王章辉等译.台北:麦田出版社,1997.
[10]阮庆岳.阅读亚洲当代建筑:30建筑师x 30关键词[M].北京:中国青年出版社,2011.