谦卑型领导对员工管家行为的影响
|
摘要
谦卑型领导在与他人的持续互动中,能客观的认识自己,能面对下属坦诚自身的不足与错误,在合作与竞争的组织情景中,能欣赏和肯定下属的优秀以及贡献,并且善于向下属学习,寻求建设性的意见。本文通过272名样本对象,运用有调节的中介模型分析了谦卑型领导对员工管家行为的影响作用。结果表明,谦卑型领导显著正向影响员工责任感和管家行为;员工责任感在谦卑型领导与员工管家行为之间具有部分中介效应;领导者自我牺牲精神和上下级关系均在谦卑型领导对员工责任感和管家行为的影响中具有调节效应。同时,领导者自我牺牲精神和上下级关系对员工责任感在谦卑型领导与员工管家行为之间具有调节效应。
引文
①Owens B. P., Hekman D. R..Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4): 787-818.
②彭娇子、张亚军、肖小虹:《谦卑型领导对员工建言的影响机制研究》,《中外管理》2016年第8期。
③Hernandez M. Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37(2):172-193.
(1)Hernandez M. Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 80(1):121-128
(2)陈伟民、张驰:《领导成员交换关系对企业员工管家行为倾向的研究——心理所有权的中介作用》,《南京邮电大学学报》2014年第3期。
(3)Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. The Big Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44(1).
(4)Cropanzano R, Mitchell M S. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(6):874-900.
(5)Edmondson A C. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in orgnizations: A group-level lens//Kramer R M,Coor K S. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004: 239-272.
(6)王成利:《变革型领导与知识型团队绩效关系研究:心理资本及组织公平感的中介作用》,《山东大学学报》(哲社版)2017年第6期。
(7)Choi Y, Mai-Dalton R R. On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. Leadership Quarterly, 1998, 9(4):475-501.
(8)Choi Y, Yoon J. Effects of leaders' self-sacrificial behavior and competency on followers' attribution of charismatic leadership among Americans and Koreans. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2005,11 (5):51-69.
(9)Kenneth S. Law, Chi-Sum Wong, Duanxu Wang, et al. Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000, 11(4):751-765.
(10)Subodh Kulkarni, Nagarajan Ramamoorthy. Leader–member exchange, subordinate stewardship, and hierarchical governance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011, 22(13):2770-2793.
(11)侯二秀、陈树文、长青:《知识员工心理资本对创新绩效的影响:心理契约的中介》,《科学学与科学技术管理》2012年第6期。
(12)Morrison E W, Phelps C C. Taking Charge at Work: Extra role Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(4):403-419.
(13)Davis J H, Allen M R, Hayes H D. Is Blood Thicker Than Water? A Study of Stewardship Perceptions in Family Business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010, 34(6):1093-1116.
(14)Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y. Podsakoff NP: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
(15)Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
②彭娇子、张亚军、肖小虹:《谦卑型领导对员工建言的影响机制研究》,《中外管理》2016年第8期。
③Hernandez M. Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37(2):172-193.
(1)Hernandez M. Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 80(1):121-128
(2)陈伟民、张驰:《领导成员交换关系对企业员工管家行为倾向的研究——心理所有权的中介作用》,《南京邮电大学学报》2014年第3期。
(3)Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. The Big Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44(1).
(4)Cropanzano R, Mitchell M S. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(6):874-900.
(5)Edmondson A C. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in orgnizations: A group-level lens//Kramer R M,Coor K S. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004: 239-272.
(6)王成利:《变革型领导与知识型团队绩效关系研究:心理资本及组织公平感的中介作用》,《山东大学学报》(哲社版)2017年第6期。
(7)Choi Y, Mai-Dalton R R. On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. Leadership Quarterly, 1998, 9(4):475-501.
(8)Choi Y, Yoon J. Effects of leaders' self-sacrificial behavior and competency on followers' attribution of charismatic leadership among Americans and Koreans. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2005,11 (5):51-69.
(9)Kenneth S. Law, Chi-Sum Wong, Duanxu Wang, et al. Effect of supervisor–subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2000, 11(4):751-765.
(10)Subodh Kulkarni, Nagarajan Ramamoorthy. Leader–member exchange, subordinate stewardship, and hierarchical governance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011, 22(13):2770-2793.
(11)侯二秀、陈树文、长青:《知识员工心理资本对创新绩效的影响:心理契约的中介》,《科学学与科学技术管理》2012年第6期。
(12)Morrison E W, Phelps C C. Taking Charge at Work: Extra role Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(4):403-419.
(13)Davis J H, Allen M R, Hayes H D. Is Blood Thicker Than Water? A Study of Stewardship Perceptions in Family Business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010, 34(6):1093-1116.
(14)Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y. Podsakoff NP: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
(15)Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.