不同方法缩尺后粗粒料强度和变形特性研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Coarse Aggregate After Different Grading Scale Methods
  • 作者:王思睿 ; 朱俊高 ; 陈浩锋 ; 翁厚洋
  • 英文作者:WANG Sirui;ZHU Jungao;CHEN Haofeng;WENG Houyang;Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering,Hohai University;Jiangsu Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology,Hohai University;Changzhou Architectural Research Institute Co.,Ltd;Hongrun Construction Group Co.,Ltd.;
  • 关键词:粗粒料 ; 缩尺方法 ; 三轴试验 ; 围压 ; 强度 ; 变形
  • 英文关键词:coarse-grained material;;grading scale methods;;triaxial test;;confining pressure;;strength;;deformation
  • 中文刊名:HJXU
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Natural Science Edition)
  • 机构:河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室;江苏省岩土工程技术工程研究中心河海大学;常州市建筑科学研究院股份有限公司;宏润建设集团股份有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:河北工程大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.124
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51479052);; 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0404801)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HJXU201901008
  • 页数:6
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:13-1375/N
  • 分类号:38-42+76
摘要
对某原型级配堆石料采用剔除法(TC)和混合法(HH)两种缩尺方法进行缩尺,对缩尺后的两种粗粒料试样(分别简称TC料和HH料)进行三轴固结排水剪切试验。结果表明:围压相同时,TC料的峰值应力(σ1-σ3)f与内摩擦角均高于HH料的相应值;TC料有着较强的剪胀性;相同围压下,与HH料相比,TC料具有较小的破坏应变εaf与相变处体变εv0及较高的相变应力比M0;同一粒径下,TC料割线弹性模量约为HH料的1.03~1.39倍。当颗粒最大粒径增大时,TC料的割线体积模量的增幅小于HH料的相应值。随着颗粒最大粒径的增大,两种缩尺方法所得的弹性模量参数K有所增大而变形模量指数n减小。
        Two grading scale methods in the Chinese standard,exclusion method and hybrid method,are used to scale a kind of coarse aggregate. Triaxial consolidation drainage shear tests have been performed on samples of different particle sizes. The results show that when the confining pressure is the same,the peak stress(σ1-σ3)f and friction angle φ obtained by the exclusion method are higher than that obtained by the hybrid method. Coarse-grained material acquired by the exclusion method has a stronger dilatancy. Besides,under the same con?ning pressure,compared with coarse-grained material obtained by the hybrid method,both εaf and εv0 obtained by the exclusion method are smaller and its M0 is higher. Lastly,under the same particle size,the secant elastic modulus obtained by the exclusion method is about 1.03 to 1.39 times higher than that obtained by the hybrid method. When the particle size increases,the bulk modulus obtained by the exclusion method increases less than that obtained by the hybrid method and the elastic modulus parameter K obtained by the two scale methods increases and the deformation modulus index n decreases.
引文
[1]日本土质工学会著.粗粒料的现场压实[M].郭熙灵,文丹译.北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
    [2]郭庆国.粗粒土的工程特性及应用[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
    [3]郦能惠.高混凝土面板堆石坝新技术[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007.
    [4]中华人民共和国行业标准.SL237-1999土工试验规程[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.
    [5]MARSAL R J. Large scale testing of rockfill materials[J].Journal of the Soil Mechanics&Foundations Division,1967, 93(2):27-43.
    [6]MARSCHI N D, CHAN C K, SEED H B. Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics&Foundations Div, 1972, 98(1):95-114.
    [7]#12
    [8]朱俊高,翁厚洋,吴晓铭,等.粗粒料级配缩尺后压实密度试验研究[J].岩土力学,2010, 31(8):2394-2398.
    [9]傅华,韩华强,凌华.堆石料级配缩尺方法对其室内试验结果的影响[J].岩土力学,2012, 33(9):2645-2649.
    [10]AHAD, BAGHERZADEH Khalkhali, ASGHAR, et al.Numerical and experimental direct shear tests for coarsegrained soils[J]. Particuology, 2009, 7(1):83-91.
    [11]王永明,朱晟,任金明,等.筑坝粗粒料力学特性的缩尺效应研究[J].岩土力学,2013, 34(6):1799-1806.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700