摘要
《篇海类编》收字虽不足4万,但在传抄编撰过程中由于汉字形近或音近等原因常导致讹误现象的产生。《篇海类编》讹误情况主要有两个来源,一方面承袭《玉篇》以来的字书中讹误,另一方面由于汉字形近或音近等因素导致其直接承袭《详校篇海》时发生讹误。通过《篇海类编》与《详校篇海》的对较,同时充分利用历代字书收录的信息对其进行他较,发现《篇海类编》在字头、注音、排版等方面存在讹误情况。
No more than 40000 characters were collected in Pian Hai Lei Bian (篇海类编),but there were numerous proofreading errors caused by similar pattern or sound in the process of copying and compiling. The errors of the book come from either the mistakes of the dictionaries after Yu Pian (玉篇) or Xiang Jiao Pian Hai (祥校篇海) for the similar pattern or sound of the characters. By comparing Pian Hai Lei Bian (篇海类编) with Xiang Jiao Pian Hai (祥校篇海) and other dictionaries of past dynasties,the author found errors of Pian Hai Lei Bian (篇海类编) in the prefix,phonetic notation,typesetting and so on.
引文
[1][明]李登.重刊详校篇海[M]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[2][明]宋濂.篇海类编[M]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[3][北宋]陈彭年.大宋重修广韵[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2005.
[4][北宋]丁度.集韵[M].述古堂影宋抄本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
[5][东汉]许慎.说文解字[K].北京:中华书局,1963.
[6][南朝梁]顾野王.原本玉篇残卷[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[7]释空海.篆隶万象名义[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
[8][明]梅膺祚.字汇[K]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海辞书出版社,1995.
[9][北宋]陈彭年.大广益会玉篇[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[10][北宋]司马光.类篇[M].姚刊三韵本.北京:中华书局,1984.
[11][辽]释行均.龙龛手鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[12][清]段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1998.
[13][金]韩道昭.改并五音类聚四声篇海(简称《四声篇海》)[M]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
(1)本文以续修四库全书版《详校篇海》与《篇海类编》为基础,但《详校篇海》《日部》疑为后人增补,故此例以美国哈佛大学汉和图书馆珍藏《详校篇海》所注“,而振切,音刃。眩懣也”为依据。