证据图检索实施情况与证据总结方法调查分析
|
摘要
目的:分析证据图的检索实施情况与证据总结方法。方法:通过检索外文数据库获得证据图的研究,按照纳入排除标准筛选,设计资料提取表提取证据图检索和结果呈现,用Comprehensive Meta Analysis 2. 0软件对数据进行分析。结果:检索频率最高的数据库依次为Pub Med、EMBASE和Psych INFO,79. 7%全文和66. 7%计划书报告了检索日期,92. 8%全文和100. 0%计划书提供了检索词,49. 3%全文和66. 7%计划书报告了检索式,63. 8%全文和66. 73%计划书实施了补充检索; 83. 9%全文和58. 3%计划书描述了纳入研究的类型,30. 4%全文和83. 3%计划书报告了数据分析软件;其中,69篇、54篇和40篇证据图全文分别采用文字描述、表格和图形对证据进行总结,只有24篇证据图全文同时采用文字描述、表格和图形总结证据。结论:目前证据图研究对数据库检索和证据总结形式仍不全面。建议今后证据图研究者应完善检索策略和证据总结的形式。
Objective: To analyze the retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods of evidence mapping( EM). Methods: We systematically searched major databases,and included all available study of evidence mapping in the world,and extracted the related information of retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods,and the related data were analyzed by the Comprehensive Meta Analysis 2. 0 software. Results: The most commonly retrieved databases were Pub Med,EMBASE and Psych INFO,79. 7% full text and 66. 7% protocol of EMs reported the search time,92. 8% full text and 100. 0% protocol of EMs reported the search terms,49. 3% full text and 66. 7%protocol of EMs reported the search strategy,63. 8% full text and 66. 7% protocol of EMs performed the additional search,83. 9% full text and 58. 3% protocol of EMs reported the type of study,30. 4% full text and 83. 3% protocol of EMs reported the statistical software.69 EMs,54 EMs and 40 EMs summarized the evidence by the words,table and figure respectively,only 24 EMs summarized the evidence by the words,table and figure. Conclusion: There are enough room for retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods of EMs,in the future,the researcher should improve the aspect of the search strategy and the form of evidence synthesis.
Objective: To analyze the retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods of evidence mapping( EM). Methods: We systematically searched major databases,and included all available study of evidence mapping in the world,and extracted the related information of retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods,and the related data were analyzed by the Comprehensive Meta Analysis 2. 0 software. Results: The most commonly retrieved databases were Pub Med,EMBASE and Psych INFO,79. 7% full text and 66. 7% protocol of EMs reported the search time,92. 8% full text and 100. 0% protocol of EMs reported the search terms,49. 3% full text and 66. 7%protocol of EMs reported the search strategy,63. 8% full text and 66. 7% protocol of EMs performed the additional search,83. 9% full text and 58. 3% protocol of EMs reported the type of study,30. 4% full text and 83. 3% protocol of EMs reported the statistical software.69 EMs,54 EMs and 40 EMs summarized the evidence by the words,table and figure respectively,only 24 EMs summarized the evidence by the words,table and figure. Conclusion: There are enough room for retrieval status and evidence synthesis methods of EMs,in the future,the researcher should improve the aspect of the search strategy and the form of evidence synthesis.
引文
[1] Katz DL,Williams AL,Girard C,et al. The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine:methods of Evidence Mapping with application to CAM[J]. Altern Ther Health Med,2003,9(4):22-30.
[2] Schmucker C,Motschall E,Antes G,et al. Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review[J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz,2013,56(10):1390-1397.
[3] Hetrick SE,Parker AG,Callahan P,et al. Evidence mapping:illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health[J]. J Eval Clin Pract 2010,16(6):1025e30.
[4]田金徽.全面、系统收集资料是进行系统评价的先决条件———“循证医学文献检索专题”序[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):1.
[5]葛龙,安妮,曾巧铃,等.我国干预类系统评价/Meta分析文献检索新挑战[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):2-8.
[6]梁莉,葛龙,周为文,等.我国诊断性试验系统评价/Meta分析的检索情况调查分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):9-16.
[7]尚文茹,王娟,艾丽唤,等.剂量-反应Meta分析检索实施情况调查分析[J].中国药物评价,2017,34(5):324-328.
[8]尚文茹,王娟,陈艳兰,等.剂量-反应Meta分析检索报告情况分析[J].中国药物评价,2017,34(5):329-333.
[9]田金徽,李伦,葛龙,等.网状Meta分析检索实施情况调查分析[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(6):321-326.
[10]田金徽,李伦,葛龙,等.网状Meta分析检索报告情况分析[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(6):327-332.
[11]王昕,冯鑫媛,冯媛,等.我国“系统评价/Meta分析”冠名学位论文文献检索情况分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(11):1343-1351.
[12] Sawicki CM,Livingston KA,Obin M,et al. Dietary Fiber and the human gut microbiota:application of evidence mapping methodology[J]. Nutrients,2017,9(2):E125.
[13] Althuis MD,Weed DL. Evidence mapping:Methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes[J]. Am J Clin Nutr,2013,98(3):755-768.
[14]高亚,葛龙,李伦,等. Scoping Review撰写方法简介[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(5):321-324.
[15]田金徽,Fujian Song,李伦,等.间接比较方法简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(3):365-368.
[16]田金徽,李伦,赵晔,等.网状Meta分析的撰写与报告[M].中国药物评价,2013,30(6):321-323,333.
[17]田金徽.系统评价再评价撰写注意事项[J].中国药物评价,2019,36(1):1-4.
[2] Schmucker C,Motschall E,Antes G,et al. Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review[J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz,2013,56(10):1390-1397.
[3] Hetrick SE,Parker AG,Callahan P,et al. Evidence mapping:illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health[J]. J Eval Clin Pract 2010,16(6):1025e30.
[4]田金徽.全面、系统收集资料是进行系统评价的先决条件———“循证医学文献检索专题”序[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):1.
[5]葛龙,安妮,曾巧铃,等.我国干预类系统评价/Meta分析文献检索新挑战[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):2-8.
[6]梁莉,葛龙,周为文,等.我国诊断性试验系统评价/Meta分析的检索情况调查分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013,22(5):9-16.
[7]尚文茹,王娟,艾丽唤,等.剂量-反应Meta分析检索实施情况调查分析[J].中国药物评价,2017,34(5):324-328.
[8]尚文茹,王娟,陈艳兰,等.剂量-反应Meta分析检索报告情况分析[J].中国药物评价,2017,34(5):329-333.
[9]田金徽,李伦,葛龙,等.网状Meta分析检索实施情况调查分析[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(6):321-326.
[10]田金徽,李伦,葛龙,等.网状Meta分析检索报告情况分析[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(6):327-332.
[11]王昕,冯鑫媛,冯媛,等.我国“系统评价/Meta分析”冠名学位论文文献检索情况分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(11):1343-1351.
[12] Sawicki CM,Livingston KA,Obin M,et al. Dietary Fiber and the human gut microbiota:application of evidence mapping methodology[J]. Nutrients,2017,9(2):E125.
[13] Althuis MD,Weed DL. Evidence mapping:Methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes[J]. Am J Clin Nutr,2013,98(3):755-768.
[14]高亚,葛龙,李伦,等. Scoping Review撰写方法简介[J].中国药物评价,2018,35(5):321-324.
[15]田金徽,Fujian Song,李伦,等.间接比较方法简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(3):365-368.
[16]田金徽,李伦,赵晔,等.网状Meta分析的撰写与报告[M].中国药物评价,2013,30(6):321-323,333.
[17]田金徽.系统评价再评价撰写注意事项[J].中国药物评价,2019,36(1):1-4.