国家自然科学基金项目“企业安全绩效测评体系研究(51474193)”研究技术路线及进展
|
摘要
为建立适合我国企业的安全绩效测量工具,本研究团队首先明确了"双路径多循环验证"的我国企业安全绩效测量工具研究技术路线;介绍了应用信息沉淀法所建立的包括基于事故后果和管理过程的安全绩效测量维度,以及采用结构方程模型、德尔菲法和数据包络分析法对测量工具多循环验证等方面的研究进展;最后指出本研究的创新和局限性。结果表明该工具有超行业、系统科学的特点,不仅适用于我国企业安全管理,同时可应用于区域政府安全监管。
In order to develop a tailored safety performance measurement tool for Chinses enterprises. First of all, the research team defined the "2 path & multi-tests"research technology route of safety performance measurement tool for Chinese enterprises; Then it introduced the research progress in the construction of safety performance measurement tools based on accident analysis and management systems, and the multitests for its reliability and applicability by the approaches of structural equation model(SEM), Delphi and data envelopment analysis(DEA) respectively; Finally, it points out the innovation and deficiency of this research.The results showed that this tool is systematic and integrated beyond industries, which is not only suitable for the safety management of Chinese enterprises, but also for the safety supervision of regional governments.
In order to develop a tailored safety performance measurement tool for Chinses enterprises. First of all, the research team defined the "2 path & multi-tests"research technology route of safety performance measurement tool for Chinese enterprises; Then it introduced the research progress in the construction of safety performance measurement tools based on accident analysis and management systems, and the multitests for its reliability and applicability by the approaches of structural equation model(SEM), Delphi and data envelopment analysis(DEA) respectively; Finally, it points out the innovation and deficiency of this research.The results showed that this tool is systematic and integrated beyond industries, which is not only suitable for the safety management of Chinese enterprises, but also for the safety supervision of regional governments.
引文
[1]Ant?o P,Calderón M,Puig M,et al.Identification of Occupational Health,Safety,Security(OHSS)and Environmenta Performance Indicators in Port Areas[J].Safety Science,2016,85:266-275.
[2]樊运晓,张旭凤.集团化企业安全绩效测评研究综述[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(3):255-259.
[3]张旭凤.企业生产安全绩效指标体系及其在供电企业测量应用研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[4]FAN Yunxiao,LI Zhi,PEI Jingjing,et al.Applying Systems Thinking Approach to Accident Analysis in China:Case Study of"7.23"Yong-Tai-Wen High-Speed Train Accident[J].Safety Science,2015,76:190-201.
[5]李智,樊运晓.基于系统思考的“7.23”动车事故主体行为模式分析[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(2):124-129.
[6]FAN Yunxiao,ZHU Jing,PEI Jingjing,et al.Analysis for Yangmingtan Bridge Collapse[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2015,56:20-27.
[7]王仲.功能共振分析方法在事故分析中的改进应用[D].北京:中国地质大学,2017.
[8]李红玉,樊运晓.基于系统思考的AL Solutions粉尘爆炸事故分析[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(2):90-95.
[9]王一帆.基于系统思考的我国特种设备安全监管体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[10]朱静.基于NVivo分析桥梁坍塌事故原因[D].北京:中国地质大学,2015.
[11]武彦光.基于HFACS的井喷事故致因因素NVivo分析[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[12]王晶,樊运晓,高远.基于HFACS模型的化工事故致因分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(9):81-86.
[13]李智.基于系统思考的事故分析方法研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2015.
[14]李红玉.基于系统动力学的企业安全管理绩效预测研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[15]高远,樊运晓,王鹏,等.基于STPA的特种设备安全违规致因模型研究[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(5):49-52.
[16]GAO Yuan,FAN Yunxiao,WANG Jing,et al.Procedural Management of Safety Regulations and Rules for the Chemica Industry[J].Process Safety Progress,2018,37(4):1-18.
[17]樊运晓,傅贵,朱亚威,等.安全管理体系产生与发展综述[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(8):3-9.
[18]王璇.基于HSG65对企业内部安全管理职责划分研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2018.
[19]樊运晓,高远,裴晶晶.由欧洲高校安全学科发展看安全工程专业属性[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(12):128-133
[20]贾雯靖.安全绩效测量指标体系建立及其适用性研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[21]邵楠楠.基于SEM的企业安全绩效维度指标关系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[22]GAO Yuan,FAN Yunxiao,WANG Jing,et al.The Mediating Role of Safety Management Practices in Process Safety Culture in the Chinese Oil Industry[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2019,57:223-230.
[23]何录新.基于DEA的企业安全管理绩效测评研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[24]朱茜瑶.基于三阶段数据包络法的企业安全管理绩效测评研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2018.
[2]樊运晓,张旭凤.集团化企业安全绩效测评研究综述[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(3):255-259.
[3]张旭凤.企业生产安全绩效指标体系及其在供电企业测量应用研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
[4]FAN Yunxiao,LI Zhi,PEI Jingjing,et al.Applying Systems Thinking Approach to Accident Analysis in China:Case Study of"7.23"Yong-Tai-Wen High-Speed Train Accident[J].Safety Science,2015,76:190-201.
[5]李智,樊运晓.基于系统思考的“7.23”动车事故主体行为模式分析[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(2):124-129.
[6]FAN Yunxiao,ZHU Jing,PEI Jingjing,et al.Analysis for Yangmingtan Bridge Collapse[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2015,56:20-27.
[7]王仲.功能共振分析方法在事故分析中的改进应用[D].北京:中国地质大学,2017.
[8]李红玉,樊运晓.基于系统思考的AL Solutions粉尘爆炸事故分析[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(2):90-95.
[9]王一帆.基于系统思考的我国特种设备安全监管体系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[10]朱静.基于NVivo分析桥梁坍塌事故原因[D].北京:中国地质大学,2015.
[11]武彦光.基于HFACS的井喷事故致因因素NVivo分析[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[12]王晶,樊运晓,高远.基于HFACS模型的化工事故致因分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(9):81-86.
[13]李智.基于系统思考的事故分析方法研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2015.
[14]李红玉.基于系统动力学的企业安全管理绩效预测研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[15]高远,樊运晓,王鹏,等.基于STPA的特种设备安全违规致因模型研究[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(5):49-52.
[16]GAO Yuan,FAN Yunxiao,WANG Jing,et al.Procedural Management of Safety Regulations and Rules for the Chemica Industry[J].Process Safety Progress,2018,37(4):1-18.
[17]樊运晓,傅贵,朱亚威,等.安全管理体系产生与发展综述[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(8):3-9.
[18]王璇.基于HSG65对企业内部安全管理职责划分研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2018.
[19]樊运晓,高远,裴晶晶.由欧洲高校安全学科发展看安全工程专业属性[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(12):128-133
[20]贾雯靖.安全绩效测量指标体系建立及其适用性研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[21]邵楠楠.基于SEM的企业安全绩效维度指标关系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2014.
[22]GAO Yuan,FAN Yunxiao,WANG Jing,et al.The Mediating Role of Safety Management Practices in Process Safety Culture in the Chinese Oil Industry[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2019,57:223-230.
[23]何录新.基于DEA的企业安全管理绩效测评研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2016.
[24]朱茜瑶.基于三阶段数据包络法的企业安全管理绩效测评研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2018.