多层螺旋CT低浓度对比剂联合低剂量扫描诊断消化道出血的实验研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Experimental Study of Low Concentration Contrast Agent Combined with Low Dose MSCT Scanning Technique in Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  • 作者:翟宁 ; 于鹏 ; 宫凤玲 ; 李孟静 ; 张惠英 ; 马春梅 ; 王星稳
  • 英文作者:ZHAI Ning;YU Peng;GONG Fengling;LI Mengjing;ZHANG Huiying;MA Chunmei;WANG Xingwen;CT Division,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital;Faculty of Graduate Students,North China University of Science and Technology;Department of Nuclear Medicine,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital;
  • 关键词:体层摄影术 ; 辐射剂量 ; 低对比剂浓度 ; 消化道 ; 活动性出血
  • 英文关键词:Tomography;;Radiation dosage;;Low contrast concentration;;Gastrointestinal;;Active hemorrhage
  • 中文刊名:QKYX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese General Practice
  • 机构:华北理工大学附属医院CT室;华北理工大学研究生学院;华北理工大学附属医院核医学科;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-19 10:06
  • 出版单位:中国全科医学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.22;No.594
  • 基金:河北省科技厅支撑计划项目(162777172)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QKYX201903029
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:13-1222/R
  • 分类号:114-119
摘要
背景采用多层螺旋CT(MSCT)诊断消化道出血的辐射剂量及对比剂用量大。碘对比剂的CT值随着管电压的降低而增加,利用碘的这一特性,本研究试图在满足诊断需求的前提下,确定同时降低辐射剂量及对比剂剂量的最优扫描方案。目的探讨MSCT低浓度对比剂联合低剂量扫描技术在消化道出血模型扫描中诊断出血的可行性,以期获得最优扫描方案,为临床应用提供研究基础。方法检测2014年5月——2016年10月于华北理工大学附属医院行MSCT增强检查诊断并手术证实的消化道出血患者(30例)出血点CT值,平均值(212.1±64.5)HU。以测得的出血点CT值为参考值,将非离子型对比剂碘佛醇(320 mgI/ml)用0.9%氯化钠溶液稀释成4种不同浓度碘溶液,依次为6.40、5.76、5.12、4.48 mgI/ml,120 kV对应CT值分别为(214.7±1.6)、(185.9±1.4)、(162.2±1.4)、(140.5±2.5)HU。对出血模型分组行不同剂量CT增强扫描,常规组120 kV,300 mAs;低剂量组:A亚组100 kV,300 mAs;B亚组100 kV,400 mAs;C亚组80 kV,400 mAs;D亚组80 kV,465 mAs,对比剂浓度对应4种碘溶液浓度。每种浓度扫描7次。由2位经验丰富的放射医师采用双盲法读片,记录CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP),并计算有效剂量(ED);测量图像客观噪声、计算图像信噪比、图像质量主观评分,记录每组MSCT对模型消化道出血检出情况,并测量出血点CT值,评价出最优扫描方案。结果常规组CTDIvol为19.6 mGy,低剂量组A亚组CTDIvol为12.4 mGy,低剂量组B亚组CTDIvol为16.5 mGy,低剂量组C亚组CTDIvol为8.2 mGy,低剂量组D亚组CTDIvol为9.5 mGy。低剂量组各组的DLP、ED低于常规组(P<0.05)。低剂量组B亚组图像噪声、信噪比、图像质量主观评分与常规组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);低剂量组A、C、D亚组图像客观噪声高于常规组,图像噪声信噪比、图像质量主观评分低于常规组(P<0.05)。同一对比剂浓度下低剂量组各亚组模型出血点CT值均高于常规组(P<0.05)。常规组6.40 mgI/ml与低剂量组B亚组6.40、5.76 mgI/ml对模型出血检出率相同;常规组6.4 mgI/ml与低剂量组B亚组5.12 mgI/ml对模型出血检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);低剂量组B亚组4.48 mgI/ml对模型出血检出率低于常规组(P<0.05)。结论 MSCT双低技术在消化道出血模型扫描中诊断出血是可行的,低剂量组B亚组(100 kV,400 mAs)为最优扫描参数组,在模拟出血速率为0.5 ml/min情况下,该扫描条件下显示模型出血点的最优对比剂浓度为5.12 mgI/ml,对应出血点CT值为(99.4±10.1)HU。
        Background Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal bleeding by multislice-spiral CT(MSCT)received high doses of radiation and contrast agents.The CT value of iodine contrast agent was increased with the decrease of tube voltage.We tried to determine the optimal scanning scheme to reduce the radiation dose and contrast dose simultaneously on the premise of satisfying the diagnostic requirements.Objective To explore the feasibility of low-concentration contrast medium of MSCT combined with low-dose scanning technology in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding model scanning,so as to obtain the optimal scanning scheme and provide research basis for clinical application.Methods CT values of bleeding points of 30 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed by MSCT enhanced examination and confirmed by surgery from May 2014 to October 2016 in North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital were measured.The average value was(212.1±64.5) HU.Taking the measured CT value of the bleeding point as the reference value,the nonionic contrast agent,ioversol(320 mgI/ml) was diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride solution and divided into 4 iodine solutions with different concentrations(6.4,5.76,5.12, and 4.48 mgI/ml,respectively).The corresponding CT values of 120 kV were(214.7±1.6),(185.9±1.4),(162.2±1.4),and(140.5±2.5) HU, respectively. Different doses of CT enhancement scanning were performed on the bleeding model groups.The control group was 120 kV and 300 mAs.Experimental group:Group A:100 kV,300 mAs;Group B:100 kV,400 mAs;Group C:80 kV,400 mAs;Group D:80 kV,465 mAs,and the concentration of contrast agent corresponds to the concentration of 4 iodine solutions.Each concentration was scanned 7 times.Two experienced radiologists used double blind method to read the film,recorded CT volume dose index(CTDIvol) and dose length product(DLP),and calculate effective dose(ED).The objective noise of the image was measured,the signal-to-noise ratio of the image and subjective score of the image quality calculated,the detection of gastrointestinal bleeding in each group of MSCT recorded,and the CT value of bleeding points measured to evaluate the optimal scanning scheme.Results CTDIvol was 19.6 mGy in control group,12.4 mGy in experimental group A,16.5 mgy in experimental group B,8.2 mGy in experimental group C,and 9.5 mGy in experimental group D.DLP and ED in experimental groups were lower than those in control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in image noise,signal-to-noise ratio and subjective score of image quality between experimental group B and control group(P>0.05).The image noise of groups A,C and D in the experimental group was higher than that of control group,while the signal-to-noise ratio and subjective score of image quality were lower than those of control group(P<0.05).The average CT values of the bleeding points in all experimental groups were higher than those of the control group at the same concentration of contrast agent(P<0.05).Control group(6.4 mgI/ml) and experimental group B(6.4 and 5.76 mg I/ml) had the same detection rate of bleeding.There was no statistically significant difference between experimental group B(5.12 mgI/ml) and control group(6.4 mgI/ml) in detection rate(P>0.05),while experimental group B(4.48 mgI/ml) had lower detection rate than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion MSCT double low technique is feasible to diagnose hemorrhage in digestive tract hemorrhage model scanning.Experimental group B(100 kV,400 mAs) is the optimal scanning parameter.Under the condition of simulated hemorrhage rate of 0.5 ml/min,the optimal contrast agent concentration at the bleeding point of the model under the scanning condition is 5.12 mgI/ml,and the corresponding CT value at the bleeding point is about(99.4±10.1) HU.
引文
[1]梁朝晖.CT小肠造影对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值[J].中国现代医学杂志,2014,24(11):90-93.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2014.11.020.LIANG C H.Diagnostic value of CT enterography in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding[J].China Journal of Modern Medicine,2014,24(11):90-93.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2014.11.020.
    [2]张桂丽,石磊,王翔宇.MSCT对下消化道出血诊断价值的研究进展[J].中国老年保健医学,2014,12(2):67-68.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4860.2014.02.032.ZHANG G L,SHI L,WANG X Y.Advances in the diagnostic value of MSCT for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage[J].Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care,2014,12(2):67-68.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4860.2014.02.032.
    [3]BRENNER D J,HALL E J.Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure[J].Engl J Med,2007,357(22):77-84.DOI:10.1056/NEJMra072149.
    [4]王忠敏,傅维安,陆志俊,等.CT引导下经皮射频消融治疗肾上腺转移性肿瘤的初步疗效[J].介入放射学杂志,2009,18(5):340-343.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2009.05.006.WANG Z M,FU W A,LU Z J,et al.CT-gnided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of metastatic adrenal malignancies:the initial results[J].Journal of Interventional Radiology,2009,18(5):340-343.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2009.05.006.
    [5]CHANG K J,CAOVAN D B,GRAND D J,et al.Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography;decreasing tube voltage to 100kVp[J].Radiology,2013,266(3):791-800.DOI:10.1148/radiol.12120134.
    [6]陈至操.CT小肠成像与胶囊内镜对小肠疾病诊断的对比研究[D].广东:南方医科大学,2015.CHEN Z C.Comparison of CT enterography(CTE)and capsule endoscopy(CE)for small bowel diseases[J].Guangdong,Southern Medical University,2015.
    [7]SUN H,XUE H D,WANG Y H,et al.Dual-source dualenergy computed tomography angiography for active gastrointestinal bleeding:a preliminary studt[J].Clin Radiol,2013,68(2):139-147.DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2012.06.106.
    [8]YOON W,JEONG Y Y,KIM J K.Acute gastrointestinal bleeding:contrast-enhanced MDCT[J].Abdom Im Asging,2006,31(1):1-8.DOI:10.1007/s00261-005-0367-8.
    [9]林少波.多层螺旋CT对消化道出血的诊断价值[J].罕少疾病杂志,2014,21(6):12-14.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2014.06.04.LIN S B.The diagnostic value of multislice CT(MSCT)for gastrointestinal hemorrhage[J].Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases,2014,21(6):12-14.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2014.06.04.
    [10]梁韬,曾苗雨,王毓佳,等.64层螺旋CT在上消化道出血诊断中的临床应用价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2016,10(10):1432-1436.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.10.018.LIANG T,ZENG M Y,WANG Y J,et al.Clinical value of CT diagnosis of patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage[J].Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition),2016,10(10):1432-1436.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.10.018.
    [11]JOST G,LENGSFELD P,LENHARD D C,et al.Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents during renal excretion[J].Eur J Radiol,2011,80(2):373-377.DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.003.
    [12]唐坤,李瑞,林洁,等.80 kV低管电压扫描对脑CT血管成像图像质量及辐射剂量的影响[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(3):177-180.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2013.03.006.TANG K,LI R,LIN J,et al.Effect of 80 kV low tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose at cerebral computed tomography angiography[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging,2013,21(3):177-180.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2013.03.006.
    [13]陈志安,潘勇,岳勇,等.CT图像噪声相关因素的分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2001,12(19):1236-1237.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2001.12.049.CHEN Z A,PAN Y,YUE Y,et al.Analysis of noise effected factors on CT imaging[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology,2001,12(19):1236-1237.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2001.12.049.
    [14]张龙江,卢光明.CT血管成像静脉注射碘对比剂的原则和策略[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(6):597-600.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2011.06.024.ZHANG L J,LU G M.Principles and strategies of intravenous iodinated contrast agent administration on CT angiography[J].Chinese Journal of Radiology,2011,45(6):597-600.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2011.06.024.
    [15]白桦,胡海波.MDCT冠状动脉CTA检查中辐射剂量的优化控制[J].中国医疗器械信息,2008,14(5):23-30.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2008.05.014.BAI H,HU H B.Dose Reduction in CTA examination with multidetector computed tomography for patients with coronary heart disease[J].China Medical Device Information,2008,14(5):23-30.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2008.05.014.
    [16]李杨.双低头颈部CT血管造影的可行性研究[D].山东:青岛大学,2015.LI Y.Feasibility study of CT angiography in neck of double head[J].Shandong:Qingdao University,2015.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700