东北亚人文和经济地理
|
摘要
文章对东北亚的人文发展与经济地理现状数据进行了全面的梳理与分析。具体而言,文章从人口与经济、城市发展、产业与企业发展、交通网络建设、信息与文化设施等角度探讨东北亚的空间格局。研究发现,东北亚的人口与经济规模主要集中在中国东北与韩国、日本。朝鲜、蒙古国的产业仍然以一产和二产为主。其中,日本在高端生产性服务业、汽车领域有着巨大的优势,而中国东北在先进装备制造业、化工、食品加工等领域处于领先地位,虽然形成了一定的汽车产业集群,但是相较日韩而言优势并不明显。其次,东北亚的空中"两横两纵"交通网络已相对完善,陆上交通网络以高速公路和铁路为主,但是海上通道的合作与开通未来仍有巨大提升空间。此外,东北亚地区的信息网络已经非常发达,然而教育设施与文化设施在空间上仍然分配不均。总体而言,东北亚未来在经济增长、交通网络建设与科教合作方面仍有巨大增长潜力。
This paper presents a comprehensive data collection and analysis of the humanity cultural and economic geography in Northeast Asia. Specifically, this paper explores the spatial characteristic of population, economy, urban development, industry development, transport network, information network and culture facilities in Northeast Asia. The result shows that the main growing regions of Northeast Asia are northeast China, South Korea and Japan. The economic growth of North Korea and Mongolia still rely on the primary and secondary industry. Particularly, Japan shows huge advantages in high end service industry and auto industry. Northeast China leads the region in terms of advanced equipment manufacturing industry, chemical industry and food production industry, even though the auto industry cluster is relatively smaller than Japan and South Korea. In addition, the airline network, highway network and railway network are relatively developed in Northeast Asia. But, for sea transport, cooperation between coastal cities and inland cities are supposed to be strengthened and more sea transport routes should be proposed. Moreover, although the information network is highly developed, the spatial distribution education resource and culture facilities are uneven across the whole region. In summary, Northeast Asia still shows growing potential in economic development, transport infrastructure construction and education and research cooperation in the future.
This paper presents a comprehensive data collection and analysis of the humanity cultural and economic geography in Northeast Asia. Specifically, this paper explores the spatial characteristic of population, economy, urban development, industry development, transport network, information network and culture facilities in Northeast Asia. The result shows that the main growing regions of Northeast Asia are northeast China, South Korea and Japan. The economic growth of North Korea and Mongolia still rely on the primary and secondary industry. Particularly, Japan shows huge advantages in high end service industry and auto industry. Northeast China leads the region in terms of advanced equipment manufacturing industry, chemical industry and food production industry, even though the auto industry cluster is relatively smaller than Japan and South Korea. In addition, the airline network, highway network and railway network are relatively developed in Northeast Asia. But, for sea transport, cooperation between coastal cities and inland cities are supposed to be strengthened and more sea transport routes should be proposed. Moreover, although the information network is highly developed, the spatial distribution education resource and culture facilities are uneven across the whole region. In summary, Northeast Asia still shows growing potential in economic development, transport infrastructure construction and education and research cooperation in the future.
引文
[1]矫克华.儒学与东北亚国家建筑景观研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(S1):227-232.
[2]祁进玉.东北亚“文化经济共同体”的构想、路径与展望[J].世界民族,2012(3):73-83.
[3]戚伟,刘盛和,金凤君.东北三省人口流失的测算及演化格局研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(12):1 795-1 804.
[4]胡小强.环鄱阳湖城市群城市产业区位商和城市职能指数实证研究[J].东方企业文化,2011(20):79-81.
[5]龚勤林,郭帅新.区域协同视角下的城市职能识别及其优化研究——以成都城市群为例[J].区域经济评论,2016(3):97-104.
[6]杜显波.四川省地级以上城市职能分类研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2013.
[7]张序强,张桂兰,董雪旺.东北亚三地区经济技术合作研究[J].经济地理,2001,21(3):275-278,282.
[8]李梓祎.产业联动对东北亚经济合作的影响研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2017.
[9]孙泓.东北亚海上交通道路的形成和发展[J].深圳大学学报:人文社会科学版,2010,27(5):131-137.
[10]朱建霖.东北亚区域合作背景下丹东港对外服务功能与经贸效应研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2013.
[11]金旻荣.连接东北亚地区交通网络构建及其互动——以韩国国家基干交通网计划(2001—2020年)为中心[J].东北亚学刊,2013(1):36-41.
[12]徐琮垣.东北亚整合交通网发展战略与对策研究[D].北京:清华大学,2010.
[13]董超,修春亮,魏冶.基于通信流的吉林省流空间网络格局[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):510-519.
[14]韩增林,郭建科,杨大海.辽宁沿海经济带与东北腹地城市流空间联系及互动策略[J].经济地理,2011,31(5):741-747.
[15]魏冶.流空间视角的沈阳市空间结构研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2013.
[16]赵民,张艺帅.东北亚国际城市网络[C]//全球城市与区域规划会议.上海:同济大学,2017.
[2]祁进玉.东北亚“文化经济共同体”的构想、路径与展望[J].世界民族,2012(3):73-83.
[3]戚伟,刘盛和,金凤君.东北三省人口流失的测算及演化格局研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(12):1 795-1 804.
[4]胡小强.环鄱阳湖城市群城市产业区位商和城市职能指数实证研究[J].东方企业文化,2011(20):79-81.
[5]龚勤林,郭帅新.区域协同视角下的城市职能识别及其优化研究——以成都城市群为例[J].区域经济评论,2016(3):97-104.
[6]杜显波.四川省地级以上城市职能分类研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2013.
[7]张序强,张桂兰,董雪旺.东北亚三地区经济技术合作研究[J].经济地理,2001,21(3):275-278,282.
[8]李梓祎.产业联动对东北亚经济合作的影响研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2017.
[9]孙泓.东北亚海上交通道路的形成和发展[J].深圳大学学报:人文社会科学版,2010,27(5):131-137.
[10]朱建霖.东北亚区域合作背景下丹东港对外服务功能与经贸效应研究[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2013.
[11]金旻荣.连接东北亚地区交通网络构建及其互动——以韩国国家基干交通网计划(2001—2020年)为中心[J].东北亚学刊,2013(1):36-41.
[12]徐琮垣.东北亚整合交通网发展战略与对策研究[D].北京:清华大学,2010.
[13]董超,修春亮,魏冶.基于通信流的吉林省流空间网络格局[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):510-519.
[14]韩增林,郭建科,杨大海.辽宁沿海经济带与东北腹地城市流空间联系及互动策略[J].经济地理,2011,31(5):741-747.
[15]魏冶.流空间视角的沈阳市空间结构研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2013.
[16]赵民,张艺帅.东北亚国际城市网络[C]//全球城市与区域规划会议.上海:同济大学,2017.