不同滴灌形式对沙培黄瓜生长、品质及产量的影响
|
摘要
以"京研旱宝2号"黄瓜为试材,通过田间试验,对膜下地表和膜下浅埋2种滴灌形式对沙培黄瓜生长、品质及产量的影响进行了研究,以期获得种植沙培黄瓜最适宜的滴灌形式。结果表明:在黄瓜苗期,浅埋滴灌的植株生长状况与地表滴灌处理相比具有较大差异,浅埋滴灌处理一次灌水后10cm处的土壤含水率在一天时间内一直维持在较高阶段,其黄瓜苗期的最大株高、茎粗分别比地表滴灌提升30.8%和12.8%。;前、中、后期产量分别比地表滴灌提高27.6%、8.7%和24.1%,总产量比地表滴灌提高了10.9%;2种滴灌形式下黄瓜的干物质、维生素C含量之间无显著性差异,而浅埋滴灌比地表滴灌的水溶性糖含量提升28.6%。因此浅埋滴灌更有利于沙培黄瓜的生长。
Taking cucumber ‘Jingyan Hanbao No.2’ as material,surface and subsurface drip irrigation was used to search the effect of different irrigation methods on growth and yield of cucumber grown in sand culture by field trial in order to obtain the most suitable form of drip irrigation for cultivating sandy cucumber.The results showed that in the seeding stage,subsurface drip irrigation was better than the surface drip irrigation.Compared with the surface drip irrigation,the maximum plant height and stem diameter of subsurface drip irrigation increased by 30.8% and 12.8%,respectively.After irrigation,the sand moisture content of subsurface drip irrigation remained a relative high level.The yield of subsurface drip irrigation in the early stage,mid stage and later stage increased by 27.6%,8.7%and 24.1%respectively.The total yield increased by 10.9%.There was no significant difference in the contents of dry matter and vitamin C between the two drip irrigation methods.The water soluble sugar content of subsurface drip irrigation was 28.6%,higher than that of surface drip irrigation.So subsurface drip irrigation was more conducive to the growth of sandy cucumber.
Taking cucumber ‘Jingyan Hanbao No.2’ as material,surface and subsurface drip irrigation was used to search the effect of different irrigation methods on growth and yield of cucumber grown in sand culture by field trial in order to obtain the most suitable form of drip irrigation for cultivating sandy cucumber.The results showed that in the seeding stage,subsurface drip irrigation was better than the surface drip irrigation.Compared with the surface drip irrigation,the maximum plant height and stem diameter of subsurface drip irrigation increased by 30.8% and 12.8%,respectively.After irrigation,the sand moisture content of subsurface drip irrigation remained a relative high level.The yield of subsurface drip irrigation in the early stage,mid stage and later stage increased by 27.6%,8.7%and 24.1%respectively.The total yield increased by 10.9%.There was no significant difference in the contents of dry matter and vitamin C between the two drip irrigation methods.The water soluble sugar content of subsurface drip irrigation was 28.6%,higher than that of surface drip irrigation.So subsurface drip irrigation was more conducive to the growth of sandy cucumber.
引文
[1]连兆煌.无土栽培原理与技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994.
[2]张汉玲.沙培黄瓜简介[J].河北农业科技,1979(4):22-23.
[3]李程,黄莉,郭松,等.沙漠日光温室礼品西瓜沙培品种适应性筛选研究[J].北方园艺,2014(16):37-39.
[4]李程,黄莉,郭松,等.沙漠日光温室樱桃番茄沙培品种适应性筛选研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(2):7-8,10.
[5]于明英,晏清洪,肖娟等.保水剂对基质育苗及沙培小油菜生长的影响[J].节水灌溉,2018(1):30-32,37.
[6]安顺伟,周继华,王克武,等.灌溉方式对大棚黄瓜灌溉水分配和水分生产效率的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(8):171-174.
[7]王雯,张雄.不同灌溉方式对榆林沙区马铃薯生长和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(4):153-159.
[8]吴燕,梁银丽.灌溉方式对黄瓜结果期根系特征与产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):66-70.
[9]杜社妮,白岗栓,梁银丽.灌溉方式对黄瓜生长、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2010,36(4):433-439.
[10]杨丽娟,张玉龙,须晖.棚室蔬菜生产中灌溉技术研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2003(6):264-267.
[11]杜社妮.温室黄瓜适宜的灌溉方式为滴灌和交替沟灌[J].农家顾问,2010(11):29.
[12]于秀琴,窦超银,于景春.温室微润灌溉对黄瓜生长和产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(7):159-163.
[13]王华松.冬暖棚黄瓜膜下微灌与沟灌效果比较[J].长江蔬菜,1997(10):29-30.
[14]张保东,任慧勤,陈清.不同灌溉方式对设施西瓜生长和品质的影响[J].节水灌溉,2008(9):21-22,26.
[15]韩会会.日光温室温光环境与黄瓜叶及瓜条生长关系研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2017.
[16]王柳,张福墁,魏秀菊.不同氮肥水平对日光温室黄瓜品质和产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007(12):225-229.
[17]食品中水分的测定:GB/T 5009.3-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[18]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2004.
[19]水果、蔬菜维生素C含量测定法:GB/T 6195-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[20]韦彦,赵景文,张正伟,等.灌溉方式对温室内主要环境因子及黄瓜生长发育的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007(3):204-208.
[2]张汉玲.沙培黄瓜简介[J].河北农业科技,1979(4):22-23.
[3]李程,黄莉,郭松,等.沙漠日光温室礼品西瓜沙培品种适应性筛选研究[J].北方园艺,2014(16):37-39.
[4]李程,黄莉,郭松,等.沙漠日光温室樱桃番茄沙培品种适应性筛选研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(2):7-8,10.
[5]于明英,晏清洪,肖娟等.保水剂对基质育苗及沙培小油菜生长的影响[J].节水灌溉,2018(1):30-32,37.
[6]安顺伟,周继华,王克武,等.灌溉方式对大棚黄瓜灌溉水分配和水分生产效率的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(8):171-174.
[7]王雯,张雄.不同灌溉方式对榆林沙区马铃薯生长和产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(4):153-159.
[8]吴燕,梁银丽.灌溉方式对黄瓜结果期根系特征与产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):66-70.
[9]杜社妮,白岗栓,梁银丽.灌溉方式对黄瓜生长、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2010,36(4):433-439.
[10]杨丽娟,张玉龙,须晖.棚室蔬菜生产中灌溉技术研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2003(6):264-267.
[11]杜社妮.温室黄瓜适宜的灌溉方式为滴灌和交替沟灌[J].农家顾问,2010(11):29.
[12]于秀琴,窦超银,于景春.温室微润灌溉对黄瓜生长和产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(7):159-163.
[13]王华松.冬暖棚黄瓜膜下微灌与沟灌效果比较[J].长江蔬菜,1997(10):29-30.
[14]张保东,任慧勤,陈清.不同灌溉方式对设施西瓜生长和品质的影响[J].节水灌溉,2008(9):21-22,26.
[15]韩会会.日光温室温光环境与黄瓜叶及瓜条生长关系研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2017.
[16]王柳,张福墁,魏秀菊.不同氮肥水平对日光温室黄瓜品质和产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007(12):225-229.
[17]食品中水分的测定:GB/T 5009.3-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[18]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2004.
[19]水果、蔬菜维生素C含量测定法:GB/T 6195-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[20]韦彦,赵景文,张正伟,等.灌溉方式对温室内主要环境因子及黄瓜生长发育的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007(3):204-208.