多渠道国际技术溢出效应的区域差异性研究
|
摘要
文章采用2004年-2015年全国30个省市、自治区的数据,结合空间计量的方法研究了国际R&D溢出对中国经济增长及全要素生产率的影响。从全国整体看,自主创新、对外投资以及出口贸易均能显著促进地区经济增长,但仅有进口贸易能显著提高全要素生产率;东部地区自主创新、对外投资、进出口贸易均能显著促进地区经济增长,而进出口贸易则对东部地区全要素生产率具有积极影响;中部地区自主创新和对外投资会促进该地区经济增长,而外商投资、对外投资以及进口贸易则能提升中部地区全要素生产率;对于西部地区,自主创新和进口贸易能显著促进地区经济增长,同时进口贸易还能显著提高西部地区全要素生产率。基于上述研究结论,提出我国各区域应采取不同的对外经济策略。
This article aims to research the affection of the knowledge spillover from international to the economic growth in china based on the panel data of 2004-2015 through the method of spatial panel data model. The results show that From an overall perspective,independent innovation,foreign investment and export trade can significantly promote regional economic growth. However,only import trade can significantly improve total factor productivity. In the eastern region,independent innovation,foreign investment,import trade and export trade can significantly promote regional economic growth While the import and export trade has a positive impact on the total factor productivity. The independent innovation and foreign investment will promote economic growth,while foreign investment,foreign investment and import trade will enhance the total factor productivity in the central region; For the western region,independent innovation and import trade can significantly promote regional economic growth,while import trade can significantly improve total factor productivity. Based on those finding,the paper put forward some related policy suggestions that the regions should be taken of the different economic policy.
This article aims to research the affection of the knowledge spillover from international to the economic growth in china based on the panel data of 2004-2015 through the method of spatial panel data model. The results show that From an overall perspective,independent innovation,foreign investment and export trade can significantly promote regional economic growth. However,only import trade can significantly improve total factor productivity. In the eastern region,independent innovation,foreign investment,import trade and export trade can significantly promote regional economic growth While the import and export trade has a positive impact on the total factor productivity. The independent innovation and foreign investment will promote economic growth,while foreign investment,foreign investment and import trade will enhance the total factor productivity in the central region; For the western region,independent innovation and import trade can significantly promote regional economic growth,while import trade can significantly improve total factor productivity. Based on those finding,the paper put forward some related policy suggestions that the regions should be taken of the different economic policy.
引文
[1] Griliches Z.The search for R&D spillovers[J].Scandinavian Journal of Economics,1992,94:29-47.
[2] Coe D T,Helpman E.International R&D spillovers [J].European Economic Reviews,1995,39(5):859-887.
[3] Lichetnberg F,Van Pottelsberghe de la Pollerie B.Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders?[J].The Views of Economic and Statistics,2001,83(3):490-497.
[4] 陈劲,陈钰芬,余芳珍.FDI对促进我国区域创新能力的影响[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):7-13.
[5] 鲁钊阳,寥杉杉.FDI技术溢出与区域创新能力差异的双门槛效应[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,(5):75-88
[6] 方希桦,包群,赖明勇.国际技术溢出:基于进口传导机制的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2004,(7):58-64.
[7] 沈能,李富有.技术势差、进口贸易溢出与生产率空间差异[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(9):108-117.
[8] 曹玉平.出口贸易、产业空间集聚与技术创新——基于20个细分制造行业面板数据的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2012,(9):73-82.
[9] 徐德英.多渠道国际技术溢出下区域创新门槛效应研究[J].科研管理,2017,(s1):53-62.
[10] 黄菁菁,原毅军.产学研合作研发中企业家精神的价值[J].科学学研究,2014,32(6):902-908.
[11] 李梅,柳士昌.人力资本与国际R&D溢出——基于OFDI传导机制的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(3):373-381.
[12] 王英,刘思峰.国际技术外溢渠道的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(4):153-161.
[13] 郑展鹏.国际技术溢出渠道对我国技术创新影响的比较研究——基于省际面板数据模型的分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(4):18-25.
[14] 靳巧花,严太华.国际技术溢出与区域创新能力——基于知识产权保护视角的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2017,(3):14-25.
[15] Goldsmith R W.A Perpetual inventory of national wealth[J].NBER Studies in Income and Wealth,1951,(14):5-61.
[16] 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004,(10):35-44.
[17] Griliches Z.R&D and productivity slowdown[J].American Economic Review,1980,70(1):343-348.
(1)东部地区包括北京、天津、河北、辽宁、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、山东、广东、海南11 个省市;中部地区包括山西、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北、湖南8个省市。西部地区包括内蒙古、广西、重庆、陕西、四川、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、宁夏、青海、新疆11 个省市。
(2)由于西藏数据缺失暂被剔除。
(3)9个国家分别为英国、德国、加拿大、美国、日本、新加坡、韩国、法国、意大利。
[2] Coe D T,Helpman E.International R&D spillovers [J].European Economic Reviews,1995,39(5):859-887.
[3] Lichetnberg F,Van Pottelsberghe de la Pollerie B.Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders?[J].The Views of Economic and Statistics,2001,83(3):490-497.
[4] 陈劲,陈钰芬,余芳珍.FDI对促进我国区域创新能力的影响[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):7-13.
[5] 鲁钊阳,寥杉杉.FDI技术溢出与区域创新能力差异的双门槛效应[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,(5):75-88
[6] 方希桦,包群,赖明勇.国际技术溢出:基于进口传导机制的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2004,(7):58-64.
[7] 沈能,李富有.技术势差、进口贸易溢出与生产率空间差异[J].国际贸易问题,2012,(9):108-117.
[8] 曹玉平.出口贸易、产业空间集聚与技术创新——基于20个细分制造行业面板数据的实证研究[J].经济与管理研究,2012,(9):73-82.
[9] 徐德英.多渠道国际技术溢出下区域创新门槛效应研究[J].科研管理,2017,(s1):53-62.
[10] 黄菁菁,原毅军.产学研合作研发中企业家精神的价值[J].科学学研究,2014,32(6):902-908.
[11] 李梅,柳士昌.人力资本与国际R&D溢出——基于OFDI传导机制的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(3):373-381.
[12] 王英,刘思峰.国际技术外溢渠道的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(4):153-161.
[13] 郑展鹏.国际技术溢出渠道对我国技术创新影响的比较研究——基于省际面板数据模型的分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(4):18-25.
[14] 靳巧花,严太华.国际技术溢出与区域创新能力——基于知识产权保护视角的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2017,(3):14-25.
[15] Goldsmith R W.A Perpetual inventory of national wealth[J].NBER Studies in Income and Wealth,1951,(14):5-61.
[16] 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004,(10):35-44.
[17] Griliches Z.R&D and productivity slowdown[J].American Economic Review,1980,70(1):343-348.
(1)东部地区包括北京、天津、河北、辽宁、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、山东、广东、海南11 个省市;中部地区包括山西、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北、湖南8个省市。西部地区包括内蒙古、广西、重庆、陕西、四川、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、宁夏、青海、新疆11 个省市。
(2)由于西藏数据缺失暂被剔除。
(3)9个国家分别为英国、德国、加拿大、美国、日本、新加坡、韩国、法国、意大利。