摘要
2018年春季青海省西宁市抗旱人工增雨作业主要集中在3月~5月,本文主要应用区域历史回归分析法,对人工增雨效果进行检验,根据该方法得到,2018年春季青海省西宁市抗旱人工增雨共增加区域平均降水量为11. 3mm,相对增水率为2. 96%。同时结合西宁市抗旱增雨期土壤干土层资料来看,2018年春季西宁市土壤墒情较好,人工增雨产生了较好的社会和生态效益。
In the spring of 2018,drought-resistant and artificial precipitation increased operation in Xining of Qinghai Province was mainly concentrated from March to May. This passage mainly applied the regional historical regression analysis method to test the effect of artificial precipitation. According to this method,In the spring of 2018,The average regional precipitation of drought-resistant and artificial precipitation increase was 11. 3 mm,and the relative water increase rate was 2. 96% in Xining of Qinghai Province. At the same time,combined with the dry soil layer data of the drought-resistant and rain-increasing period in Xining,the soil moisture was better in the spring of 2018 in Xining,and the artificial precipitation produced the social and ecological benefits.
引文
[1]康晓燕,周万福,马学谦,等.2016年玛柯河林区森林防火人工增雨(雪)效果评估[J].青海农林科技,2017,(3):61-62.
[2]邓占满,张中波.几种人工增雨效果评估方法的应用与研究[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(9):2675-2676.
[3]蒋年冲,曾光平,袁野,等.夏季对流云人工增雨效果评价方法初探[J].气象科学,2008,28(1):100-104.
[4]周德平,王吉宏,曾光平,等.辽宁1992-1997年飞机人工增雨效果评价[J].气象与环境学报,1999,15(1):39-41.
[5]邵振平,杜春丽.APESTS效果评估系统在河南省春季人工影响天气作业中的应用[J].河南科学,2014,32(8):1594-1598.
[6]张连云,蔡春河,王以琳.用区域控制模拟试验方法检验飞机人工增雨效果的探讨[J].山东气象,1996,16(3),56-59.
[7]房彬,肖辉,王振会,等.聚类分析在人工增雨效果检验中的应用[J].南京气象学院学报,2005,28(6):739-745.
[8]王婉,姚展予.非随机化人工增雨作业功效数值分析和效果评估[J].气候与环境研究,2012,17(6):855-861.
[9]李宏宇,稽磊,周鬼,等.北京地区人工增雨效果和防雹经济效益评估[J].高原气象,2014,33(4):1119-1130.
[10]王吉宏,班显秀,袁健,等.人工增雨效果检验方法概述[J].气象与环境学报,2003,19(1):31-32.
[11]贾烁,姚展予.江淮对流云人工增雨作业效果检验个例分析[J].气象,2016,42(2):238-245.