相关性研究及其在农业科学数据领域的应用展望——基于文献计量方法
|
摘要
通过文献计量方法对相关性研究进行统计分析和内容挖掘,分析相关性研究的主要学者和机构、研究关注要点、要点时序变化、高被引论文等,对比该领域发展现状和态势,捕捉国际范围内该领域的前沿和研究热点。基于对相关性领域1995—2017年439篇文献及其7 668篇参考文献的分析,使用Cite Space可视化分析软件对其进行可视化分析。结果显示,相关性研究作为信息检索领域的基础研究工作,属于计算机科学与信息科学的交叉研究;相关性的研究变化与目标信息类型紧密联系;农业科学数据作为新型信息载体,其相关性在农业科学数据方面的研究也会蓬勃发展。
The study focused on the main scholars and institutions, the research focuses and the evolution, the high citation papers and so on in the domain of relevance by means of bibliometric method.Compared with the status quo and trends in this field, the international frontier and research hotspot in this field were captured. Using Cite Space visual analysis software for visual analysis, we analyzed 439 papers and7 668 references about relevance from 1995 to 2017. The results showed that relevance research was the basic research work in the field of information retrieval, which belonged to the cross-study of computer science and information science. Relevance study was closely related to target information type. As the new target information type, the study of relevance in agricultural scientific data would also flourish.
The study focused on the main scholars and institutions, the research focuses and the evolution, the high citation papers and so on in the domain of relevance by means of bibliometric method.Compared with the status quo and trends in this field, the international frontier and research hotspot in this field were captured. Using Cite Space visual analysis software for visual analysis, we analyzed 439 papers and7 668 references about relevance from 1995 to 2017. The results showed that relevance research was the basic research work in the field of information retrieval, which belonged to the cross-study of computer science and information science. Relevance study was closely related to target information type. As the new target information type, the study of relevance in agricultural scientific data would also flourish.
引文
[1]Saracevic T..Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science?[R].Rutgers University,USA,2015.
[2]Bush V..As we may think The Atlantic Monthly[J].Computers&Biomedical Research,1945,25(3):238-263.
[3]Crystal A.,Greenberg J..Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(10):1368-1382.
[4]Yang M.,Marchionini G..Exploring users'video relevance criteria-A pilot study[J].INFORMATION TODAY INC,2004(41):229.
[5]Laplante A..Users'Relevance Criteria in Music Retrieval in Everyday Life:An Exploratory Study[R].ISMIR,2010:601-606.
[6]Savolainen R..Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects:Relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers[J].Journal of Documentation,2010,66(1):70-92.
[7]庞景安.科学计量研究方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.
[8]孙坦.2006-2007年国外信息检索研究进展[J].图书馆建设,2008(3):75.
[9]赵永芬.2001~2010年我国信息检索领域的文献计量分析[J].高校图书馆工作,2012(2):40-43.
[10]杨丽.国外跨语言信息检索的技术研究综述[J].情报杂志,2008(7):37-40.
[11]孙坦,周静怡.近几年来国外信息检索模型研究进展[J].图书馆建设,2008(3):82-85.
[12]魏瑞斌.基于微软学术搜索的信息检索研究的文献计量分析[J].图书情报工作,2012(12):53-57.
[13]蒲攀,丁苗苗,宋辰皓.基于文献计量分析的我国信息检索相关性研究[J].情报探索,2014(11):102-106.
[14]李杰,陈超美.Cite Space:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2016.
[15]Taylor A.,Cool C.,Belkin N..Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2007.
[16]Art Taylor,Xiangmin Zhang,William J.Amadio.Examination of relevance criteria choices and the information search process[J].Journal of Documentation,2009,65(5):719-744.
[17]Taylor A..Examination of work task and criteria choices for the relevance judgment process[J].Journal of Documentation,2013,69(4):523.
[18]Ingwersen P.,Jrvelin K..The Turn:Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context[M].Berlin:Springer Publishing Company,Incorporated,2011:821-822.
[2]Bush V..As we may think The Atlantic Monthly[J].Computers&Biomedical Research,1945,25(3):238-263.
[3]Crystal A.,Greenberg J..Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(10):1368-1382.
[4]Yang M.,Marchionini G..Exploring users'video relevance criteria-A pilot study[J].INFORMATION TODAY INC,2004(41):229.
[5]Laplante A..Users'Relevance Criteria in Music Retrieval in Everyday Life:An Exploratory Study[R].ISMIR,2010:601-606.
[6]Savolainen R..Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects:Relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers[J].Journal of Documentation,2010,66(1):70-92.
[7]庞景安.科学计量研究方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.
[8]孙坦.2006-2007年国外信息检索研究进展[J].图书馆建设,2008(3):75.
[9]赵永芬.2001~2010年我国信息检索领域的文献计量分析[J].高校图书馆工作,2012(2):40-43.
[10]杨丽.国外跨语言信息检索的技术研究综述[J].情报杂志,2008(7):37-40.
[11]孙坦,周静怡.近几年来国外信息检索模型研究进展[J].图书馆建设,2008(3):82-85.
[12]魏瑞斌.基于微软学术搜索的信息检索研究的文献计量分析[J].图书情报工作,2012(12):53-57.
[13]蒲攀,丁苗苗,宋辰皓.基于文献计量分析的我国信息检索相关性研究[J].情报探索,2014(11):102-106.
[14]李杰,陈超美.Cite Space:科技文本挖掘及可视化[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2016.
[15]Taylor A.,Cool C.,Belkin N..Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2007.
[16]Art Taylor,Xiangmin Zhang,William J.Amadio.Examination of relevance criteria choices and the information search process[J].Journal of Documentation,2009,65(5):719-744.
[17]Taylor A..Examination of work task and criteria choices for the relevance judgment process[J].Journal of Documentation,2013,69(4):523.
[18]Ingwersen P.,Jrvelin K..The Turn:Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context[M].Berlin:Springer Publishing Company,Incorporated,2011:821-822.