柔肝和胃消痞汤治疗功能性消化不良上腹痛综合征59例临床研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Study on Rougan Hewei Xiaopi Tang for 59 Cases of Functional Dyspepsia with Epigastric Pain Syndrome
  • 作者:金燕芳 ; 傅睿 ; 张盼 ; 金孟灵
  • 英文作者:JIN Yanfang;FU Rui;ZHANG Pan;JIN Mengling;
  • 关键词:功能性消化不良(FD) ; 上腹痛综合征 ; 柔肝和胃消痞汤 ; 临床症状 ; 胃感觉功能 ; 生活质量
  • 英文关键词:Functional dyspepsia(FD);;Epigastric pain syndrome;;Rougan Hewei Xiaopi tang;;Clinical symptoms;;Sensory function of the stomach;;Quality of life
  • 中文刊名:REND
  • 英文刊名:Journal of New Chinese Medicine
  • 机构:浙江中医药大学;杭州市萧山区益农镇社区卫生服务中心;浙江省立同德医院;浙江省中医药研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-05
  • 出版单位:新中医
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.51;No.538
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(81302957);; 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY17H270003);; 浙江省科技厅院所专项(2017F30044)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:REND201903046
  • 页数:4
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:44-1231/R
  • 分类号:162-165
摘要
目的:观察柔肝和胃消痞汤治疗功能性消化不良(FD)上腹痛综合征的临床疗效。方法:将120例FD上腹痛综合征患者随机分为2组。治疗组予柔肝和胃消痞汤治疗,对照组口服奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊,2组疗程均为4周。观察2组临床症状、胃感觉功能、生活质量的改善情况,评估治疗效果,统计2组停药12周时的复发情况。结果:治疗后,2组餐后饱胀不适、早饱感、中上腹痛、中上腹烧灼感均较治疗前改善(P <0.05);治疗组各项症状改善情况均优于对照组(P <0.05)。治疗后,2组胃感知阈值及胃不适阈值均较治疗前升高(P <0.05);治疗组胃感知阈值与胃不适阈值均比对照组升高更明显(P <0.05)。治疗后,对照组总体健康和活力评分均较治疗前改善(P <0.05);治疗组除生理功能评分外,余各项评分均较治疗前改善(P <0.05);组间比较,治疗组除生理功能及活力评分外,余各项评分改善情况均优于对照组(P <0.05)。治疗组总有效率88.14%,对照组总有效率71.93%,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。对照组复发率41.18%(7/17),治疗组复发率13.33%(4/30),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:柔肝和胃消痞汤能有效缓解FD上腹痛综合征患者的临床症状,改善胃感觉功能和生活质量,降低复发率。
        Objective:To observe the clinical effect of Rougan Hewei Xiaopi tang for functional dyspepsia(FD) with epigastric pain syndrome. Methods:A total of 120 patients with FD with epigastric pain syndrome were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group was treated with Rougan Hewei Xiaopi tang and the control group was given oral administration of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. The course of treatment in both groups lasted for four weeks. The improvement of the clinical symptoms,sensory function of the stomach and the quality of life in the two groups were observed. The curative effect was evaluated and the recurrences after twelve weeks of drug withdrawal in the two groups were observed. Results:After treatment,the symptoms of postprandial fullness and discomfort,early satiety,upper middle abdominal pain and burning sensation in upper middle abdomen in the two groups were improved when compared with those before treatment(P < 0.05);the improvement of each symptom in the treatment group was better than that in the control group(P < 0.05). After treatment,the gastric perception threshold and gastric discomfort threshold in the two groups were increased when compared with those before treatment(P < 0.05),and the gastric perception threshold and gastric discomfort threshold in the treatment group were increased more significantly than those in the control group(P < 0.05). After treatment,the scores of general health and vitality in the control group were improved when compared with those before treatment(P <0.05),and each score except the score of physiological function in the treatment group was improved when compared with that before treatment(P < 0.05);the improvement of each score except the score of physiological function and the score of vitality in the treatment group was better than that in the control group(P < 0.05). The total effective rate was 88.14% in the treatment group and 71.93% in the control group,the difference being significant(P < 0.05). The recurrence rate was 41.18%(7/17) in the control group and 13.33%(4/30) in the treatment group,the difference being significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion:Rougan Hewei Xiaopi tang can effectively relief the clinical symptoms of patients with FD with epigastric pain syndrome,improving the sensory function of the stomach and the quality of life as well as decreasing the recurrence rate.
引文
[1] Mahadeva S,Goh KL.Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia:A global perspective[J].World J Gastroenterol,2006,12(17):2661-2666.
    [2]李军祥,陈誩,李岩.功能性消化不良中西医结合诊疗共识意见(2017年)[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2017,25(12):889-894.
    [3] Halder SL, Talley NJ.Functional Dyspepsia:A New RomeⅢParadigm[J].Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol,2007,10(4):259-272.
    [4]中华中医药学会脾胃病分会.消化不良中医诊疗共识意见(2009)[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2010,30(5):533-537.
    [5]李启祥,朱良知,侯晓华,等.饮水负荷试验测定胃感觉的临床研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(6):436-438.
    [6]李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):38-42.
    [7]仝甲钊,曲波,王蓓蓓,等.功能性消化不良的发病机制[J].世界华人消化杂志,2013,21(9):785-790.
    [8]雒芳,刘纯伦.功能性消化不良发病机制研究进展[J].现代医药卫生,2014,30(11):1662-1665.
    [9]周福生,祝淑贞.功能性消化不良发病机制的研究进展[J].中华中医药学刊,2005,23(7):1177-1179.
    [10]陈月红,马良,陈鉴.中西医结合治疗功能性消化不良临床效果评价[J].中华中医药学刊,2015,33(12):2981-2983.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700