TOPSIS-熵权决策法在绿色施工节水措施综合效益评价中的应用
|
摘要
针对目前施工现场环境条件的多样性,致使选用不同节水措施所产生的综合效益存在很大差异,现采用实地调研及Delphi法最终筛选出19项综合效益评价指标,构建其综合效益评价指标体系,并通过引入小样本建模的TOPSIS-熵权决策综合评判方法对各节水措施综合效益进行评估分析。通过借助此方法既能降低评价结果主观性的影响,也可以解决在只有小样本数据情况下,快速准确地为施工单位选出与其施工环境条件相适应的高效节水措施的难题;最后,以甘肃地区某大型建设项目施工过程中的综合效益评价为研究对象进行实证分析,验证了所设计的评价指标及方法科学合理、评价结果客观准确,具有推广意义。
At present,due to the diversity of environmental conditions on the construction site,the comprehensive benefits arising from different water-saving measures are very different. Nowadays,by combining with local investigations and Delphi method,we finally find out 19 comprehensive benefit evaluation indexes and set up the comprehensive benefit evaluation index system. Through the introduction of small sample model of TOPSIS-The Comprehensive Method of Entropy proportion,the comprehensive benefit of each water-saving measure is evaluated. Using this method can not only reduce the influence of the subjective evaluation results,but also solve the hard problem of selecting the high efficiency water saving measures which are suitable for the construction environment under the condition of small sample data.Finally,the comprehensive benefit evaluation in the construction process of a large construction project in Gansu Province is taken as the research object,which proves that the designed evaluation index and method are scientific and reasonable,the evaluation result is objective and accurate and has the significance of popularization.
At present,due to the diversity of environmental conditions on the construction site,the comprehensive benefits arising from different water-saving measures are very different. Nowadays,by combining with local investigations and Delphi method,we finally find out 19 comprehensive benefit evaluation indexes and set up the comprehensive benefit evaluation index system. Through the introduction of small sample model of TOPSIS-The Comprehensive Method of Entropy proportion,the comprehensive benefit of each water-saving measure is evaluated. Using this method can not only reduce the influence of the subjective evaluation results,but also solve the hard problem of selecting the high efficiency water saving measures which are suitable for the construction environment under the condition of small sample data.Finally,the comprehensive benefit evaluation in the construction process of a large construction project in Gansu Province is taken as the research object,which proves that the designed evaluation index and method are scientific and reasonable,the evaluation result is objective and accurate and has the significance of popularization.
引文
[1]张希黔,林琳,王军.绿色建筑与绿色施工现状及展望[J].施工技术,2011,40(8):1-7.
[2]彭世瑾,王莉芸,蒋兴林.深圳建科大楼绿色建筑节水设计[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(2):45-49.
[3]张裕洁.浅谈节水措施在绿色施工中的应用[J].建筑施工,2011,33(7):604-606.
[4]李正焜,叶飞,梁巧真.基于价值工程的绿色施工节水措施研究[J].福建建设科技,2017(1):70-72.
[5]刘祝.绿色建筑节水措施的评价及应用优化研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2008.
[6]魏慧娇,李丛笑.我国绿色建筑节水技术措施调研分析[J].建筑行业,2015(11):28-30.
[7]Liu Haixing,Lu Jing,Zhao Ming,et al.Multi-objective optimisation design of water distribution systems:Comparison of two evolutionary algorithms[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2016,23(3):30-38.
[8]N.Huberman,D.Pearlmutter.A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert[J].Energy&Buildings,2007,40(5):837-848.
[9]闫潇.绿色建筑及绿色施工评价体系的研究与实践[D].邯郸:河北工程大学,2012.
[10]邱伟.建筑施工水资源利用与节水措施[J].价值工程,2013,32(28):141-143.
[11]王善龙.绿色施工节水节电指标及控制措施研究[M].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
[12]于泽,朱学义.基于熵权法的文化产业社会效益评价实证研究[J].出版科学,2014,22(3):54-62.
[13]罗勇,朱波.基于熵权决策法的项目选择比较模型研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(2):60-64.
[14]罗党,孙慧芳,毛文鑫.基于三角模糊数-TOPSIS的绿色施工评标方法[J].华北水利水电大学学报,2016,37(2):73-77.
[15]王新民,秦健春,张钦礼,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(3):1131-1137.
[16]雷勋平,邱广华.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域资源环境承载力评价实证研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(1):314-323.
[2]彭世瑾,王莉芸,蒋兴林.深圳建科大楼绿色建筑节水设计[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(2):45-49.
[3]张裕洁.浅谈节水措施在绿色施工中的应用[J].建筑施工,2011,33(7):604-606.
[4]李正焜,叶飞,梁巧真.基于价值工程的绿色施工节水措施研究[J].福建建设科技,2017(1):70-72.
[5]刘祝.绿色建筑节水措施的评价及应用优化研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2008.
[6]魏慧娇,李丛笑.我国绿色建筑节水技术措施调研分析[J].建筑行业,2015(11):28-30.
[7]Liu Haixing,Lu Jing,Zhao Ming,et al.Multi-objective optimisation design of water distribution systems:Comparison of two evolutionary algorithms[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2016,23(3):30-38.
[8]N.Huberman,D.Pearlmutter.A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert[J].Energy&Buildings,2007,40(5):837-848.
[9]闫潇.绿色建筑及绿色施工评价体系的研究与实践[D].邯郸:河北工程大学,2012.
[10]邱伟.建筑施工水资源利用与节水措施[J].价值工程,2013,32(28):141-143.
[11]王善龙.绿色施工节水节电指标及控制措施研究[M].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
[12]于泽,朱学义.基于熵权法的文化产业社会效益评价实证研究[J].出版科学,2014,22(3):54-62.
[13]罗勇,朱波.基于熵权决策法的项目选择比较模型研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(2):60-64.
[14]罗党,孙慧芳,毛文鑫.基于三角模糊数-TOPSIS的绿色施工评标方法[J].华北水利水电大学学报,2016,37(2):73-77.
[15]王新民,秦健春,张钦礼,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS评判模型的姑山驻留矿采矿方法优选[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(3):1131-1137.
[16]雷勋平,邱广华.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域资源环境承载力评价实证研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(1):314-323.