产后抑郁症的社区护理干预效果
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effect of community nursing intervention on postpartum depression
  • 作者:张钰 ; 董洁 ; 刘红梅
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Yu;DONG Jie;LIU Hong-mei;Outpatient Clinic, the Second People′s Hospital in Dalian City (Branch);
  • 关键词:产后抑郁症 ; 社区护理干预 ; 常规护理 ; 心理状态 ; 效果
  • 英文关键词:Postpartum depression;;Community nursing intervention;;Routine nursing;;Psychological state;;Effect
  • 中文刊名:ZGUD
  • 英文刊名:China Modern Medicine
  • 机构:大连市第二人民医院分院门诊部;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-28
  • 出版单位:中国当代医药
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.25;No.520
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGUD201833064
  • 页数:3
  • CN:33
  • ISSN:11-5786/R
  • 分类号:207-209
摘要
目的探究产后抑郁症的社区护理干预效果。方法选取2015年10月18日~2017年12月26日我院门诊部收治的120例产后抑郁症患者作为研究对象,采用电脑随机分配法将其分为观察组(60例)和对照组(60例)。观察组患者采用社区护理干预,对照组患者采用常规护理干预,比较两组患者的心理状态评分[焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)]、抑郁症状改善时间、护理干预时间及抑郁控制效果。结果观察组患者的SAS评分为(29.65±1.65)分,SDS评分为(28.41±1.35)分,均分别低于对照组[(48.68±1.64)、(49.71±1.55)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的抑郁症状改善时间为(9.34±1.02)d,护理干预时间为(15.22±1.35)d,均分别短于对照组[(14.68±1.65)、(20.69±1.85)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的抑郁控制总有效率为98.33%,高于对照组的61.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论产后抑郁症患者实施社区护理干预,能够显著改善其不良情绪,促进其尽快康复,值得研究。
        Objective To explore the effect of community nursing intervention on postpartum depression. Methods A total of 120 postpartum depression patients from the outpatient clinic in our hospital from October 18, 2015 to December 26, 2017 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the observation group(60 cases) and the control group(60 cases) according to the computerized randomization. In the observation group, community nursing intervention was used, while patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention. The scores of psychological status(self-rating anxiety scale [SAS], self-rating depression scale [SDS]), time of depressive symptoms improvement, time of nursing intervention and effect of depression control were compared between the two groups. Results The scores of SAS([29.65±1.65] points) and SDS([28.41±1.35] points) in the observation group were respectively lower than those in the control group([48.68±1.64], [49.71±1.55] points), and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The improvement time of depressive symptoms in the observation group was(9.34±1.02) d, the nursing intervention time was(15.22±1.35) d, which were respectively shorter than those in the control group([14.68±1.65],[20.69±1.85] d), and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The effectiveness rate of depression control in the observation group was 98.33%, which was higher than that in the control group accounting for 61.67%, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of community nursing intervention in patients with postpartum depression can significantly improve their bad emotion and promote their recovery as soon as possible, which is worthy of studying.
引文
[1]叶静,陈亚丽,陈志花.社区护理干预产后抑郁症效果分析[J].天津护理,2014,22(6):538-539.
    [2]罗虹健.产后抑郁症患者的社区护理干预效果分析[J].吉林医学,2014,35(9):1992-1993.
    [3]王青,高振玲.产后抑郁症社区护理干预效果分析[J].中医临床研究,2016,8(26):79-80.
    [4]毕泗艳.产后抑郁症的护理进展[J].全科护理,2013,11(21):2000-2002.
    [5]张春茹,黄晓慧,王小华,等.社区护理干预对产后抑郁的影响分析[J].中外医学研究,2013,17(19):124-125.
    [6]陈静.体验式健康教育在孕产妇社区护理中的应用价值评估[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(20):236-237.
    [7]谢金娜,徐美群,徐立中.产后抑郁症的社区护理干预[J].医学理论与实践,2013,26(6):832-833.
    [8]魏青,王艳艳.社区护理对初产妇产后抑郁干预的研究[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志:电子版,2016,3(11):92.
    [9]师丽卿.中医社区护理干预模式对产后抑郁症的影响[J].光明中医,2015,31(8):1782-1783.
    [10]任菲菲,刘沫,王阳.对产后抑郁症患者进行按摩护理的效果评价[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(17):2692-2694.
    [11]彭岚岚,唐奕,杨超艺.理性情绪疗法联合微课健康教育在产后抑郁症病人护理干预中的应用[J].护理研究,2016,30(11):1365-1366.
    [12]周润兴,周美霞,黄萍.微信平台在产妇出院后延续性护理中的应用[J].现代临床医学,2017,43(6):451-452.
    [13]陈碧泓,徐敏旋.社区干预护理对孕产妇抑郁症的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(15):155-156.
    [14]李锐云.人性化护理在产后抑郁症护理中的应用[J].中国药物与临床,2016,16(3):444-445.
    [15]李淑华,李巨奇,李卫青,等.产后抑郁症护理对策及中医药疗效评价[J].中国民族民间医药,2013,22(14):161-163.
    [16]何艳,周文琦.产后抑郁症的护理进展[J].西南国防医药,2014,24(12):1400-1401.
    [17]许瑾瑾.产后抑郁症护理干预效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2016,25(12):2287-2288.
    [18]罗旭雯,谢玉珍,杨凤英,等.罗伊适应模式在产后抑郁症病人护理中的应用[J].全科护理,2016,14(31):3305-3307.
    [19]杨明芳,陈磊,赵璐,等.产后不同时期性功能障碍影响因素分析[J].中国性科学,2017,26(7):107-109.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700