用户名: 密码: 验证码:
我国优秀女子赛艇运动员测功仪6 km、60 min测试功率与其无氧阈功率的一致性研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Consistency of Power between 6-km or 60-min Tests on Rowing Ergometer and Anaerobic Threshold in Elite Female Rowers
  • 作者:资薇
  • 英文作者:ZI Wei;Henan University;Chinese Rowing Association;
  • 关键词:赛艇 ; 测功仪 ; 6 ; km测试 ; 60 ; min测试 ; 三级测试 ; 一致性
  • 英文关键词:rowing;;6-km ergometer test;;60-min ergometer test;;3-step test;;consistency
  • 中文刊名:TYKX
  • 英文刊名:China Sport Science
  • 机构:河南大学体育学院;中国赛艇协会;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:体育科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:河南省科技厅科技发展计划项目(162400410224)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TYKX201906011
  • 页数:6
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-1295/G8
  • 分类号:85-90
摘要
目的:探索赛艇测功仪6 km测试功率(P6)及60 min测试功率(P60)和无氧阈功率(P4)之间的一致性,以便在6km和60min两种测试方法中寻求能替代无氧阈测试的方法。方法:86名我国优秀女子赛艇运动员作为测试对象,收集整理其2009年1月-2018年1月期间赛艇测功仪6km和60min的测试结果,以及同时进行的三级递增负荷测试数据,对P6和P4、P60和P4之间进行配对t检验、线性回归分析(Pearson相关)、组内相关系数以及一致性分析(Bland-Altman法)。结果:P6明显高于P4(P<0.01),P60和P4无明显差异(P>0.05),P6和P4、P60和P4之间存在高度相关,ICC检验认为,P6和P4、P60和P4之间均具有良好的一致性,但Bland-Altman检验认为,仅P60和P4之间具有较好的一致性。结论:P60和P4之间不存在明显差异,具有高度相关和较好的一致性,因此,采用赛艇测功仪60 min测试所得结果能代表三级递增负荷测试所得无氧阈功率。
        Objective: To investigate the consistency of power between 6-km test(P6) or 60-min test(P60) on rowing ergometer and anaerobic threshold(P4). Methods: The power data of P6, P60 and P4 were collected from 86 female elite rowers from January 2009 to January 2018. The paired T test, Pearson test, ICC and Bland-Altman test were used to do data analysis. Results: The power of P6 was significantly higher than P4(P<0.01), but no significant difference was found between P60 and P4(P>0.05). The power of P6 was highly related with P4, and the relationship between P60 and P4 was significantly as well. The ICC test showed a good consistency between P6 & P4, as well as P60 & P4. However, the Bland-Altman test showed only P60 & P4 have a good consistency. Conclusion: The power of P60 was highly related with P4 and the data was good consistency between these two tests. Thus, the 60-min test on rowing ergometer can be considered as an alternative method to measure athletes' power in replacing the anaerobic threshold test.
引文
陈奇,耿明南,张蓝予,等,2017.辽宁省赛艇运动员无氧阈应用性研究[J].辽宁体育科技,39(1):47-50.
    杜忠林,王武韶,顾军,等,2000.优秀赛艇运动员无氧阈增长幅度的分析[J].中国运动医学杂志,19(1):92-95.
    江崇民,邱淑敏,王欢,等,2011.平板运动跑台和场地环境测试走、跑运动能量消耗的比较研究[J].体育科学,31(7):30-36.
    黎涌明,2013.世界赛艇科学的德国流[J].体育科学,33(6):77-84.
    刘玉秀,缪华章,陆梦洁,等,2014.定量方法对比研究重复测量设计Bland-Altman一致限LoA的可信区间估计[J].中国卫生统计,31(2):224-229.
    毛爱华,王蕊,2015.5种皮褶厚度公式对肥胖儿童少年体脂量预测的比较研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,34(1):98-101.
    孟志军,高炳宏,高欢,2014.男子赛艇运动员高原训练机能变化与专项成绩的个体差异研究[J].中国体育科技,50(2):46-51.
    缪华章,2014.基于Bland-Altman法LoA可信区间的一致性评价[D].广州:南方医科大学.
    屈金涛,曾凡星,封文平,2015.Sensewear在高温高湿环境不同强度运动中的有效性[J].北京体育大学学报,38(6):66-70.
    屈萍,屈胜国,陈丹,等,2012.赛艇测功仪在帆船运动员体能测试中的应用研究[J].吉林体育学院学报,28(2):4-7.
    萨建,刘桂芬,2011.定量测量结果的一致性评价及Bland-Altman法的应用[J].中国卫生统计,28(4):409-413.
    王超,陈佩杰,庄洁,等,2012.加速度计以不同采用间隔测量儿童青少年日常体力活动时间的一致性研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,31(9):759-765.
    王刚,高炳宏,高欢,等,2015.亚高原训练对不同高原训练经历男子赛艇运动员有氧运动能力的影响[J].中国体育科技,51(4):42-48.
    王欢,邱淑敏,江崇民,等,2011.便携式与固定式气体代谢仪测试效果的比较研究[J].体育科学,31(8):65-71.
    闻浩,陆梦洁,2015.定量测量Bland-Altman一致性评价方法研究及临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,28(10):1107-1111.
    吴纪宁,黄兴,吴昊,2008.多级负荷测试在赛艇训练强度控制中的应用研究[J].湖北体育科技,27(1):121-123.
    张旭东,周洋,2016.手机运动软件测量健身走、跑能量消耗准确性的研究[J].河北体育学院学报,30(5):59-66.
    张勇,魏明涓,2013.中等强度主观感觉等级与心率预测最大耗氧量研
    究[J].体育科学,33(12):87-93.
    周铁成,王海,朱琳,2016.青少年日常体力活动摄氧量预测方程的建立和检验[J].广州体育学院学报,36(6):93-96.
    资薇,2015.女子赛艇2 000 m模拟比赛划过程中能量代谢和能效特点[J].北京体育大学学报,38(9):130-135.
    ALTMAN D G,BLAND J M,1983.Measurement in medicine:The analysis of method comparison studies[J].Statistician,32:307-317.
    BARTKO J J,1966.Then intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability[J].Psychol Rep,19(1):3-11.
    BISHOP D,JENKINS D G,MACKINNON L T,1998.The relationship between plasma lactate parameters,Wpeak and 1-h cycling performance in women[J].Med Sci Sports Exer,30(8):1270-1275.
    BLAND J M,ALTMAN D G,1986.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J].Lancet,1(8476):307-310.
    CHARILAOS P,Doyle J A,BRIAN D L,2006.Relationship between running velocity of 2 distances and various lactate parameters[J].Int JSports Physiol Perform,1:270-283.
    JACKY F,DEAN B,FIONA R,et al.,2017.Using lactate threshold to predict 5-km treadmill running performance in veteran athletes[J].Biol Sport,34(3):233-237.
    JAREK M,JAAK J,TOIVO J,2005.Monitoring of performance and training in rowing[J].Sports Med,35(7):597-617.
    KURT J,2005.Monitoring athlete’s physiology[M]//VOLKER N.Rowing Faster.Second edition.USA:Human Kinetics:25-30.
    MANTHA S,ROIZEN M F,FLEISHER L A,et al.,2000.Comparing methods of clinical measurement:Reporting standards for bland and altman analysis[J].Anesth Analg,90(3):593-602.
    MICKELSON T C,HAGERMAN F C,1982.Anaerobic threshold measurements of elite oarsmen[J].Med Sci Sports Exer,14:440.
    OLIVER F,WILFRIED K,TIM M,2009.Lactate threshold conceptsHow valid are they?[J].Sports Med,39(6):469-490.
    PETER J,2001.Lactate Threshold Training[M].USA:Human Kinetics.
    ROBERT M,NICHOLSON,GORDON G S,2001.Indices of lactate threshold and their relationship with 10-km running velocity[J].Med Sci Sports Exer,33(2):339-342.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700