中美国际OA期刊影响力评价与比较
|
摘要
文章以中美国际OA期刊为例,结合OA期刊的传统引文指标并引入Altmetrics指标,构建中美国际OA期刊影响力评价与比较模型,从OA期刊的学术影响力、社会影响力两个维度构建OA期刊评价指标体系。通过标准化处理、相关分析、信/效度分析、因子分析、二维分析等对中美国际OA期刊学术影响力与社会影响力进行评价与比较。研究发现:(1)不论是在学术影响力层面,还是在社会影响力层面,中美国际OA期刊评价得分值相差甚大,美国国际OA期刊的影响力远大于中国国际OA期刊的影响力。(2)基于JCR的7个传统引文指标间呈现较强的正相关,基于Altmetrics Explorer的8个Altmetrics指标间呈现高度的正相关关系,且指标在整体上与内部间都具有较为显著的一致性。(3)66种中美国际OA期刊的学术影响力得分与社会影响力得分存在中度的正相关关系,OA期刊学术影响力评价为社会影响力评价做了有益补充。最后提出提升我国国际OA期刊影响力的建议。
Taking the international OA(Open Access) journals of China and USA as an example and combining tradi?tional citation indexes and introducing the Altmetrics indexes, this paper constructs a model of impact evaluation and comparison and constructs an evaluation index system of OA journals from two dimensions of academic influence and social influence. Through standardization, correlation analysis, reliability/validity analysis, factor analysis and two-di?mensional analysis, the academic and social influence of OA journals are evaluated and compared between China and USA. The authors found that:(1)In terms of academic influence and social influence, the evaluation scores of interna?tional OA journals are quite different between China and USA. The influence of American international OA journals is far greater than that of Chinese international OA journals.(2)There is a strong positive correlation between the 7 tradi?tional citation indicators based on JCR, and a high positive correlation between the 8 Altmetrics indexes based on Alt?metrics explorer, and the indexes have a significant consistency both overall and internally.(3)There is a moderately positive correlation between academic influence and social influence scores of 66 OA journals. The evaluation of aca?demic influence of OA journals is a useful supplement to the evaluation of social influence. Finally, suggestions are put forwardtoenhancetheinfluenceofChineseinternationalOAjournals.
Taking the international OA(Open Access) journals of China and USA as an example and combining tradi?tional citation indexes and introducing the Altmetrics indexes, this paper constructs a model of impact evaluation and comparison and constructs an evaluation index system of OA journals from two dimensions of academic influence and social influence. Through standardization, correlation analysis, reliability/validity analysis, factor analysis and two-di?mensional analysis, the academic and social influence of OA journals are evaluated and compared between China and USA. The authors found that:(1)In terms of academic influence and social influence, the evaluation scores of interna?tional OA journals are quite different between China and USA. The influence of American international OA journals is far greater than that of Chinese international OA journals.(2)There is a strong positive correlation between the 7 tradi?tional citation indicators based on JCR, and a high positive correlation between the 8 Altmetrics indexes based on Alt?metrics explorer, and the indexes have a significant consistency both overall and internally.(3)There is a moderately positive correlation between academic influence and social influence scores of 66 OA journals. The evaluation of aca?demic influence of OA journals is a useful supplement to the evaluation of social influence. Finally, suggestions are put forwardtoenhancetheinfluenceofChineseinternationalOAjournals.
引文
[1]Budapest Open Access Initiative[EB/OL].[2018-09-20].https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.
[2]罗新.开放获取期刊可达性和稳定性的调查与研究--以DOAJ收录期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(1):43-47.
[3]张晓林,李麟,刘细文,等.开放获取学术信息资源:逼近“主流化”转折点[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(9):42-47.
[4]陈静,孙继林.学术期刊开放获取出版定量研究探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(6):87-101.
[5]陈娟.Scopus和Wo S收录开放获取期刊的定量研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(4):405-413.
[6]陈铭.期刊利用统计与Altmetrics的兴起[J].图书与情报,2014(1):12-17.
[7]孙竹梅,华薇娜,汪志兵.Altmetrics视域下论文摘要阅读次数与被引次数间的关系辨析--以国内多学科开放获取期刊为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(4):28-32,38.
[8]刘洢颖,姚长青,田瑞强.复合开放获取期刊中开放获取论文学术影响力研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(2):156-165.
[9]张晋朝,梁伊琪.我国开放获取期刊现状及发展分析[J].出版科学,2018,26(5):87-96.
[10]杨思洛,袁庆莉,韩雷.中美发表的国际开放获取期刊论文影响比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(1):67-88.
[11]王小玲.开放获取对提升英文期刊影响力的作用--《气候变化研究进展》(英文版)的实践[J].编辑学报,2017,29(S2):108-110.
[12]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(12):136-139.
[13]程爱娟.基于Altmetrics的单篇论文影响力评价研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2017.
[14]Thelwall M.Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?[J].Aslib Journal of Information Management,2017,69(2):174-183.
[15]Maflahi N,Thelwall M.How quickly do publications get read?The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2018,69(1):158-167.
[16]刘洢颖,姚长青,田瑞强.复合开放获取期刊中开放获取论文学术影响力研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(2):156-165.
[17]曹敏,赵莹莹,程仲基,等.影响中国开放存取期刊发展的因素及策略分析[J].编辑学报,2017,29(S1):11-12.
[18]赵兵,郭才正,钱景.DOAJ收录我国开放存取期刊的统计与分析--兼谈如何提高我国开放存取期刊的发展水平[J].新世纪图书馆,2018(1):62-65.
[2]罗新.开放获取期刊可达性和稳定性的调查与研究--以DOAJ收录期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(1):43-47.
[3]张晓林,李麟,刘细文,等.开放获取学术信息资源:逼近“主流化”转折点[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(9):42-47.
[4]陈静,孙继林.学术期刊开放获取出版定量研究探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(6):87-101.
[5]陈娟.Scopus和Wo S收录开放获取期刊的定量研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(4):405-413.
[6]陈铭.期刊利用统计与Altmetrics的兴起[J].图书与情报,2014(1):12-17.
[7]孙竹梅,华薇娜,汪志兵.Altmetrics视域下论文摘要阅读次数与被引次数间的关系辨析--以国内多学科开放获取期刊为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2017(4):28-32,38.
[8]刘洢颖,姚长青,田瑞强.复合开放获取期刊中开放获取论文学术影响力研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(2):156-165.
[9]张晋朝,梁伊琪.我国开放获取期刊现状及发展分析[J].出版科学,2018,26(5):87-96.
[10]杨思洛,袁庆莉,韩雷.中美发表的国际开放获取期刊论文影响比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(1):67-88.
[11]王小玲.开放获取对提升英文期刊影响力的作用--《气候变化研究进展》(英文版)的实践[J].编辑学报,2017,29(S2):108-110.
[12]俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山.学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J].图书情报工作,2009,53(12):136-139.
[13]程爱娟.基于Altmetrics的单篇论文影响力评价研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2017.
[14]Thelwall M.Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?[J].Aslib Journal of Information Management,2017,69(2):174-183.
[15]Maflahi N,Thelwall M.How quickly do publications get read?The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2018,69(1):158-167.
[16]刘洢颖,姚长青,田瑞强.复合开放获取期刊中开放获取论文学术影响力研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(2):156-165.
[17]曹敏,赵莹莹,程仲基,等.影响中国开放存取期刊发展的因素及策略分析[J].编辑学报,2017,29(S1):11-12.
[18]赵兵,郭才正,钱景.DOAJ收录我国开放存取期刊的统计与分析--兼谈如何提高我国开放存取期刊的发展水平[J].新世纪图书馆,2018(1):62-65.