东江湖流域生态经济可持续发展评价指数研究
|
摘要
以研究东江湖流域生态经济发展可持续性为目的,将东江湖流域涵盖的4个市县作为基本单位,采取系统性、可行性和科学性的原则,结合东江湖流域现状,建立东江湖流域生态经济可持续发展评价指标体系。该指标体系分为3个层次,下设3个子系统,涵盖15项指标。采用熵值法对东江湖流域生态经济系统的可持续发展进行探讨,结果表明:影响东江湖流域生态经济系统可持续发展指标最重要权重值在0.080 0~0.107 0之间波动,其中代表是从业人员人数(0.106 0);次要权重区间为0.060 0~0.080 0,以农业总产值(0.078 5)为代表指标;最次要的权重区间在0.050 0~0.060 0之间。东江湖流域生态经济可持续发展系数在4个县市之间存在一定的差异,上游地区市县生态环境优良,提供了优良的生态经济可持续发展基础,可持续发展系数得分较高,其中桂东县为0.361 1,汝城县为0.295 1,宜章县为0.246 1,资兴市为0.186 9。
In order to study the sustainable development of eco-economy in four countries in Dongjiang Lake Basin,a sustainable development appraisal indicator system was established,in accordance with the systematic,plausibal and scientific principles,taking into consideration of current situation in Dongjiang Lake Basin. The system was divided into 3levels,containing three subsystems,covering 15 indicators. The entropy evaluation method was used in this research. The results showed that among the indicator weight values for sustainable development of eco-economy in the Dongjiang Lake Basin,the most important weight values ranged between 0. 080 0 ~ 0. 107 0,with the number of employment( value0. 106 0) as the representative; the secondary indicator weight values were between 0. 060 0 ~ 0. 080 0,with the total output value of agriculture( value 0. 078 5) as the representative; and the least indicator weight values varied between0. 050 0 ~ 0. 060 0. Furthmore,differences of sustainable development coefficients for eco-economic system existed among the counties in Dongjiang Lake Basin. The counties in upper reaches enjoyed excellent ecological environment,which laid a good foundation for the area' s development,so the sustainable development coefficients were higher in this area: Guidong County was 0. 361 1,Rucheng County was 0. 295 1,and Yizhang County was 0. 246 1,and Zixing County was0. 186 9.
In order to study the sustainable development of eco-economy in four countries in Dongjiang Lake Basin,a sustainable development appraisal indicator system was established,in accordance with the systematic,plausibal and scientific principles,taking into consideration of current situation in Dongjiang Lake Basin. The system was divided into 3levels,containing three subsystems,covering 15 indicators. The entropy evaluation method was used in this research. The results showed that among the indicator weight values for sustainable development of eco-economy in the Dongjiang Lake Basin,the most important weight values ranged between 0. 080 0 ~ 0. 107 0,with the number of employment( value0. 106 0) as the representative; the secondary indicator weight values were between 0. 060 0 ~ 0. 080 0,with the total output value of agriculture( value 0. 078 5) as the representative; and the least indicator weight values varied between0. 050 0 ~ 0. 060 0. Furthmore,differences of sustainable development coefficients for eco-economic system existed among the counties in Dongjiang Lake Basin. The counties in upper reaches enjoyed excellent ecological environment,which laid a good foundation for the area' s development,so the sustainable development coefficients were higher in this area: Guidong County was 0. 361 1,Rucheng County was 0. 295 1,and Yizhang County was 0. 246 1,and Zixing County was0. 186 9.
引文
[1]梁玉华.流域系统——概念和方法[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,1997,15(1):15-19.
[2]Oberdorff T,Pont D,hugueny B.Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of river health in France[J].Freshwater Biology,2002,47(9):1720-1734.
[3]罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,等.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003(08):1606-1614.
[4]陈东景,马安青,徐中民.干旱区流域经济分析的初步研究[J].人文地理,2002,17(5):81-84.
[5]邓必平,严恩萍,洪奕丰,等.基于GIS和DEM的东江湖流域水文特征分析[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(15):3531-3536.
[6]资兴市人民政府门户网站.资兴市城市总体规划(2009-2020)[EB/OL].http://www.zixing.gov.cn/sitepublish/site1/zwgk/ghjh/qygh/content_20478.html,2012-03-01.
[7]王志宏.实施循环经济与我国可持续发展战略研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2007.
[8]张卫民.基于熵值法的城市可持续发展评价模型[J].厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004(2):109-115.
[9]Costanza R.Assuring sustainability of ecological system[J].Ecological Economics:The science and Management of Sustainability[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1991.
[10]李杰兰,焦慧元,刘晓乾,等.基于熵值法的区域循环经济发展评价模型[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(16):7686-7688.
[11]牛盼强.区域经济发展环境综合评价模型[J].中国海洋大学学报,2005(4):94-96.
[12]冯艳飞,贺丹.基于熵值法的区域循环经济发展综合评价[J].环境科学与管理,2006,31(6):177-179.
[13]Frank A.Ward,Manuel Pulido-Velazquez.Efficency,equity,and sustainability in a water quantity-quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin[J].Ecological Economics,2008:23-27.
[14]徐尚荣.基于熵值法的青海省科技创新能力评价研究[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2011,29(1):96-102.
[15]赵学平.潮河流域生态经济系统评价研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.
[2]Oberdorff T,Pont D,hugueny B.Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of river health in France[J].Freshwater Biology,2002,47(9):1720-1734.
[3]罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,等.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003(08):1606-1614.
[4]陈东景,马安青,徐中民.干旱区流域经济分析的初步研究[J].人文地理,2002,17(5):81-84.
[5]邓必平,严恩萍,洪奕丰,等.基于GIS和DEM的东江湖流域水文特征分析[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(15):3531-3536.
[6]资兴市人民政府门户网站.资兴市城市总体规划(2009-2020)[EB/OL].http://www.zixing.gov.cn/sitepublish/site1/zwgk/ghjh/qygh/content_20478.html,2012-03-01.
[7]王志宏.实施循环经济与我国可持续发展战略研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2007.
[8]张卫民.基于熵值法的城市可持续发展评价模型[J].厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2004(2):109-115.
[9]Costanza R.Assuring sustainability of ecological system[J].Ecological Economics:The science and Management of Sustainability[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1991.
[10]李杰兰,焦慧元,刘晓乾,等.基于熵值法的区域循环经济发展评价模型[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(16):7686-7688.
[11]牛盼强.区域经济发展环境综合评价模型[J].中国海洋大学学报,2005(4):94-96.
[12]冯艳飞,贺丹.基于熵值法的区域循环经济发展综合评价[J].环境科学与管理,2006,31(6):177-179.
[13]Frank A.Ward,Manuel Pulido-Velazquez.Efficency,equity,and sustainability in a water quantity-quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin[J].Ecological Economics,2008:23-27.
[14]徐尚荣.基于熵值法的青海省科技创新能力评价研究[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2011,29(1):96-102.
[15]赵学平.潮河流域生态经济系统评价研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.