集中式护理干预对脑梗死患者健康教育效果的影响
|
摘要
目的探讨集中式护理干预对脑梗死患者健康教育效果的影响。方法将本科室收治的90例脑梗死患者按照区组化原则分为观察组和对照组各45例,对照组采用常规健康教育,观察组采用集中式护理进行健康教育,比较2组健康知识掌握情况以及康复积极性。结果观察组在疾病医学知识、良肢位的摆放、康复训练知识、用药知识等健康知识方面的得分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组对康复的需求程度、依从程度、配合程度等康复积极性均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论集中式护理干预能够提高脑梗死患者的健康教育的效果,增加患者健康知识的掌握程度,提高康复积极性。
Objective To explore the effect of centralized nursing intervention on health education in patients with cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 90 patients with cerebral infarction in our department were divided into observation group( 45 cases) and control group( 45 cases),the control group received the routine health education,and the observation group used centralized nursing health education,and mastering situation of health knowledge and the positive rehabilitation were compared. Results the score of disease medical knowledge,correct placement of healthy limb,rehabilitation training knowledge,medication knowledge in the observation group were higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). The level of demand for rehabilitation,compliance,and the degree of rehabilitation in the observation group were higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Centralized nursing intervention can improve the effect of health education in patients with cerebral infarction,increase the level of health knowledge of patients,and improve their recovery.
Objective To explore the effect of centralized nursing intervention on health education in patients with cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 90 patients with cerebral infarction in our department were divided into observation group( 45 cases) and control group( 45 cases),the control group received the routine health education,and the observation group used centralized nursing health education,and mastering situation of health knowledge and the positive rehabilitation were compared. Results the score of disease medical knowledge,correct placement of healthy limb,rehabilitation training knowledge,medication knowledge in the observation group were higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). The level of demand for rehabilitation,compliance,and the degree of rehabilitation in the observation group were higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Centralized nursing intervention can improve the effect of health education in patients with cerebral infarction,increase the level of health knowledge of patients,and improve their recovery.
引文
[1]王建华.系统化健康教育对脑卒中患者生活质量的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(9):1916-1917.
[2]刘淑娟,魏雪,曹军华,等.集中型健康教育模式在NICU低收入家长教育中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2015,21(4):447-449.
[3]徐超红.个体化康复护理指导对脑卒中患者生活质量的影响[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(8):1260-1261.
[4]朱子兴,朱丹红,穆艳.集中式健康教育对患者和家属疾病知识和行为的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2012,18(24):15-17.
[5]叶维敏,洪显钗,留盈盈,等.个体化健康教育对动脉粥样硬化性脑梗死患者预后的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(3):506-507.
[6]陆乔玉.协同护理模式对脑卒中康复患者自理能力的影响[J].2014,35(4):89-91.
[7]黄伟莲,郭丽贞,王丽姿.集中授课对经皮冠状动脉介入术患者相关知识认知程度的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2013,19(12):1850-1852.
[8]周芬.集中式健康教育在神经外科的应用[J].当代护士:专科版,2013,15(12):1520-1523.
[9]杨喆.集中式护理干预模式对脑卒中患者生活质量水平的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2015,18(17):132-133.
[10]朱子兴,朱丹红,穆艳.集中式健康教育对患者和家属疾病知识和行为的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2012,18(24):15-17.
[11]潘虹,文成才,陈艳,等.授权理论联合图文式健康教育在脑梗死患者中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志,2015,21(32):3879-3881.
[2]刘淑娟,魏雪,曹军华,等.集中型健康教育模式在NICU低收入家长教育中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2015,21(4):447-449.
[3]徐超红.个体化康复护理指导对脑卒中患者生活质量的影响[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(8):1260-1261.
[4]朱子兴,朱丹红,穆艳.集中式健康教育对患者和家属疾病知识和行为的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2012,18(24):15-17.
[5]叶维敏,洪显钗,留盈盈,等.个体化健康教育对动脉粥样硬化性脑梗死患者预后的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(3):506-507.
[6]陆乔玉.协同护理模式对脑卒中康复患者自理能力的影响[J].2014,35(4):89-91.
[7]黄伟莲,郭丽贞,王丽姿.集中授课对经皮冠状动脉介入术患者相关知识认知程度的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2013,19(12):1850-1852.
[8]周芬.集中式健康教育在神经外科的应用[J].当代护士:专科版,2013,15(12):1520-1523.
[9]杨喆.集中式护理干预模式对脑卒中患者生活质量水平的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2015,18(17):132-133.
[10]朱子兴,朱丹红,穆艳.集中式健康教育对患者和家属疾病知识和行为的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2012,18(24):15-17.
[11]潘虹,文成才,陈艳,等.授权理论联合图文式健康教育在脑梗死患者中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志,2015,21(32):3879-3881.